Chapter published in:
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 15: Papers from the 2015 Leiden Conference
Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Anikó Lipták
[Approaches to Hungarian 15] 2017
► pp. 135156
References

References

Albright, Adam
2002The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles PhD. dissertation.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank
2002Kinande vowel harmony: domains, grounded conditions and one-sided alignment. Phonology 19. 139–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bat-El, Outi
2005Competing principles of in paradigm uniformity: Evidence from the Hebrew imperative paradigm. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 44–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benua, Laura
1995Identity effects in morphological truncation. In Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, 77–136. Amherst, GLSA.Google Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia & Dániel Szeredi
2013Hungarian neutral vowels: a microcomparison. Nordlyd 40.1. 20–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, Toni
1986Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst PhD. dissertation.Google Scholar
Forró, Orsolya
2013Ingadozás a magyar elölségi harmóniában. Szempontok a variabilitás szinkróniájának és diakróniájának feltárásához és értelmezéséhez [Variation in palatal harmony in Hungarian. Approaches to the interpretation of synchronic and diachronic variability]. Piliscsaba: Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem PhD. dissertation.Google Scholar
Halácsy, Péter, András Kornai, László Németh, András Rung, István Szakadát, & Viktor Trón
2004Creating open language resources for Hungarian. In Maria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira, Rute Costa & Raquel Silva (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004, May 26–28, 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, 1201–1204. Paris: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Zsuzsa Cziráky Londe
2006Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 59–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár, & Zsuzsa Londe
2009Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85. 822–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der
2015Phonological ambiguity. Theoretical Linguistics 41.1–2. 79–87. Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin. Mester
1995Japanese phonology. In John Goldsmith (ed.) The Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 817–847.Google Scholar
Kálmán, László & Forró Orsolya
2014„Lökött” korlátok nyomában. Rejtélyes mássalhangzó-magánhangzó interakciók a magyar elölségi harmóniában. [In search of unnatural constraints: mysterious consonant-vowel interactions in Hungarian backness harmony]. In É. Kiss Katalin & Hegedűs Attila (eds.), Nyelvelmélet és diakrónia 2. [Linguistic theory and language history 2.], 109–129. Piliscsaba: PPKE BTK.Google Scholar
Kálmán, László, Péter Rebrus & Miklós Törkenczy
2012Possible and impossible variation. In Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi & Péter Siptár (eds.), Current issues in morphological theory. (Ir)regularity, analogy and frequency. Papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, 13–16 May 2010, 23–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael
1996Base-identity and uniform exponence: alternatives to cyclicity. In Jacques Durand & Bertrand Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 363–393. European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Karl Pajusalu
2003 Towards a typology of disharmony. The Linguistic Review 20. 217–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Martin
2003Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linzen, Tal, Sofya Kasyanenko & Maria Gouskova
2013Lexical and phonological variation in Russian prepositions. Phonology 30. 453–515. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2010Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe
2007The locus of exceptionality: morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Leah Bateman, Michael O’Keefe, Ehren Reilly & Adam Werle (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III., 259–296. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Miklós Kontra
1989Hungarian neutral vowels. Lingua 78. 181–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Orvokki Heinämäki
1999Variation in Finnish vowel harmony: an OT account. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 303–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rebrus, Péter
2000Morfofonológiai jelenségek. [Morphophonology] In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia. [A structural grammar of Hungarian 3. Morphology.], 763–947. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Péter Szigetvári
2013Antiharmony, transparency, truncation. Poster presented at the 21st Manchester Phonology Meeting, 25 May 2013. http://​seas3​.elte​.hu​/szigetva​/papers​/att​.pdf
Rebrus, Péter, Péter Szigetvári & Miklós Törkenczy
2012Dark secrets of Hungarian vowel harmony. In Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), Sound, Structure and Sense: Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann, 491–508. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Trón Viktor
2002A fonotaktikai általánosításokról: Kísérlet a magyar mássalhangzó-kapcsolatok nem-reprezentációs leírására [On phonotactics generalizations: a non-representational account of Hungarian consonant clusters]. In Maleczki Márta (ed.) A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei V. [New methods in the description of Hungarian V], 17–63. Szeged: Szegedi Tudományegyetem.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2005Uniformity and contrast in the Hungarian verbal paradigm. In Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 262–295. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
2015aMonotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41.1–2. 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bThe monotonic behaviour of language patterns. Theoretical Linguistics 41.3–4. 241–268.Google Scholar
2015cAn ‘unnatural’ pattern of variation in vowel harmony: a frequency-based account. Poster presented at 2015 Annual Meeting on Phonology (AMP 2015), University of British Columbia and Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada 9–11 October (http://​budling​.nytud​.hu​/~tork​/owncikk​/Vancouver​_2015​_poster​.pdf).
2016Monotonicity and the limits of disharmony. In Adam Albright & Michelle A. Fullwood (eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 meeting on phonology. 1–12. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America,Google Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Törkenczy, Miklós
2006The phonotactics of Hungarian verbs. In László Varga (ed.), The Even Yearbook 7: ELTE SEAS Working Papers in Linguistics. Budapest: ELTE.Google Scholar
2011Hungarian vowel harmony. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2963–2990. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Törkenczy, Miklós, Péter Rebrus & Péter Szigetvári
2013Harmony that cannot be represented. In Johan Brandtler, Valéria Molnár & Christer Platzack (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 13: Papers from the 2011 Lund Conference Volume 13, 229–252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trón, Viktor & Péter Rebrus
2001Morphophonology and the hierarchical lexicon. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 48/1–3. 101–136.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1999Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In Jean-Marc Authier, Barbara E. Bullock & Lisa A. Reed (eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics: selected papers from the 28th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVIII), University Park, 16–19 April 199, 243–270. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In Michael Broe & Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 5., 313–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vago, Robert
1980The sound pattern of Hungarian. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie
2015Polarized exceptions: extreme bi-modal distributions of exceptional words. Talk delivered at 12th Old World Conference in Phonology (OCP12), Barcelona 27–30 January.Google Scholar