Chapter published in:
Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 16: Papers from the 2017 Budapest ConferenceEdited by Veronika Hegedűs and Irene Vogel
[Approaches to Hungarian 16] 2020
► pp. 115–136
With or without the definite article
On the syntax of anaphoric possessor strategies in Hungarian
That noun phrases may constitute a binding domain is a key component among the parallelisms between the syntax of noun phrases
and clauses. Reuland (2007, 2011) and
Despić (2011, 2015) have shown
recently that the definite article plays a crucial role in delimiting this domain, since dedicated possessive reflexive
anaphors are only possible in languages that lack a prenominal definite article. Hungarian has several anaphoric possessor
strategies, which vary in whether they require, allow, or prohibit the use of the definite article in the possessive noun
phrase. This paper gives an overview of the grammar of these strategies, and presents a discussion of the results of a
questionnaire survey that was conducted to better understand the delicate distribution of the definite article in these
constructions. The importance of these Hungarian data lies in showing that Reuland’s conjecture describes an important factor
not only in cross-linguistic, but also in language internal variation in definite article use in possessive DP’s.
Keywords: anaphor, definite article, Hungarian, logophor, noun phrase, phase, possessive, pronoun, reflexive, reciprocal
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The background of the study
- 2.1Reuland’s (2007, 2011) conjecture on dedicated possessive reflexives
- 2.2The Hungarian background
- 3.Anaphoric possessors with or without the definite article
- 3.1Pronominal possessors
- 3.2The survey
- 3.3The primary reflexive as a possessor
- 3.4The reciprocal anaphor as a possessor
- 3.5The complex reflexive önmaga ‘oneself’ as a possessor
- 4.Summary and outlook
- Acknowledgements
-
Notes -
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 08 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.06rak
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.06rak
References
Bartos, Huba
1999
Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció: A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai
háttere
[Morphosyntax and interpretation: The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena in
Hungarian.] Doctoral
thesis. Budapest: ELTE Elméleti Nyelvészet Doktori Program.
Bernstein, Judy B. & Christina Tortora
Bošković, Željko
Dékány, Éva
2011
A
profile of the Hungarian DP. The interaction of lexicalization, agreement and linearization with the functional
sequence
. Doctoral
thesis. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
Despić, Miloje
2011
Syntax
in the absence of determiner phrase
. Doctoral
thesis. University of Connecticut.
d’Hulst, Yves, Martine Coene & Liliane Tasmowski
Dikken, Marcel den
Dóla, Mónika, Anita Viszket & Judit Kleiber
Kenesei, István
Laczkó, Tibor
Marácz, László
1989
Asymmetries
in Hungarian
. Doctoral
thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Oravecz Csaba, Váradi Tamás & Sass Bálint
2014 The
Hungarian Gigaword Corpus.
Proceedings of LREC
2014
.
Pléh, Csaba
Rákosi, György
Reuland, Eric
2007 Binding
conditions: How can they be derived?
Lectures on
Binding
. Department of Linguistics, St Petersburg University. Joint PhD program
St Petersburg- Utrecht University. April 24–May 3,
2007. [Retrieved 31.01.2017] Available at: http://slioussar.narod.ru/reuland2007.htm
1989 Noun
phrases and clauses: Is DP analogous to IP or
CP? Ms. Retrieved from http://www.nyu.edu/projects/szabolcsi/szabolcsi_DP_IP_CP.pdf