Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
Edited by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 36] 2019
► pp. 162–175
Part II: Selected papers presented at the Dutch Annual Linguistics Day of 2019

The Perfect in dialogue

Evidence from Dutch

| Universiteit Utrecht, UIL-OTS
| Universiteit Utrecht, UIL-OTS
| Universiteit Utrecht, UIL-OTS
We investigate the use of the perfect in dialogue in Dutch and – for comparison – report on data from Dutch narrative discourse as well as on data from both registers in English. Our approach is corpus-based with data drawn from Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone and its translation to Dutch. Our data reveal that the Dutch perfect is sensitive to the dialogue/narrative discourse distinction and competes with the past in dialogue along the event/state distinction. This is in line with earlier findings by Boogaart (1999) and de Swart (2007) and lays the foundation for an analysis of the perfect in which we bridge the gap between the English/dialogue oriented literature (Portner 2003; Nishiyama & Koenig 2010) and the variationist/narrative discourse oriented literature (de Swart 2007; Schaden 2009).
Keywords: perfect , past , dialogue, narrative discourse, variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1The corpus
    • 2.2Preparing the corpus
    • 2.3Corpus size
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Corpus HP‑A
    • 3.2Corpus HP‑B
      • 3.2.1Events in the past
      • 3.2.2States in the perfect
      • 3.2.3A note on the continuous perfect in English and its translation in Dutch
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00030.bru
References (14)
References
Atsuko, Nishiyama, and Jean-Pierre Koenig. 2010. “What Is a Perfect State?” Language 86 (3): 611–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1999. Aspect and temporal ordering: A constrastive analysis of Dutch and English. LOT.Google Scholar
Clement, Marjoline. 1997. Josepha Mendels, taal en tijd. PhD diss., Amsterdam University (UvA).Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, and Viveka Velupillai. 2013. “The Perfect.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, edited by Matthew Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. [URL]
Friedrich, Annemarie & Damyana Gateva. 2017. “Classification of telicity using cross-linguistic annotation projection.” Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2559–2565, Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter et al. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hwa, Rebecca, Philip Resnik, Amy Weinberg & Okan Kolak. 2002. “Evaluating translational correspondence using annotation projection.” Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 392–399. Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Van Der Klis, Martijn, Bert Le Bruyn & Henriëtte De Swart. To appear. “De la sémantique des temps verbaux à la traductologie: une comparaison multilingue de L’Étranger de Camus.” In Linguistic approaches to Tense, Aspect, Modality, Evidentiality, based on the Novel L’Etranger (“The Stranger”) by Albert Camus, and its Translations, edited by Eric Corre et al. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Onrust, Margreet, Arie Verhagen & Rob Doeve. 1993. Formuleren. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2003. “The (Temporal) Semantics and (Modal) Pragmatics of the Perfect.” Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (4): 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard. 2009. “Present Perfects Compete.” Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (2): 115–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swart, Henriëtte de. 2007. “A Cross-Linguistic Discourse Analysis of the Perfect.” Journal of Pragmatics 391 (12): 2273–2307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie & Saskia Daalder. 1993. Dutch Tenses and the Analysis of a Literary Text. De val . The low countries and beyond ed. by R. S. Kirsner, 139–150. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Yarowsky, David, Grace Ngai & Richard Wicentowski. 2001. “Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora.” Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research, 109–116. Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Haans, Harvey & Helen de Hoop
2023. Past tense reference to future eventualities. Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Fuchs, Martín & Paz González
2022. Perfect-Perfective Variation across Spanish Dialects: A Parallel-Corpus Study. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Le Bruyn, Bert, Martín Fuchs, Martijn van der Klis, Jianan Liu, Chou Mo, Jos Tellings & Henriëtte de Swart
2022. Parallel Corpus Research and Target Language Representativeness: The Contrastive, Typological, and Translation Mining Traditions. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Mulder, Gijs, Gert-Jan Schoenmakers, Olaf Hoenselaar & Helen de Hoop
2022. Tense and Aspect in a Spanish Literary Work and Its Translations. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
VAN DER KLIS, MARTIJN, BERT LE BRUYN & HENRIËTTE DE SWART
2022. A multilingual corpus study of the competition betweenpastandperfectin narrative discourse. Journal of Linguistics 58:2 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.