Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 71–89

Tense and sentential negation

A typological perspective

| Ghent University/FWO
The association between sentential negation and tense has solid foundations in the literature. It has even been argued that sentential negative markers consist of a Tense feature (De Clercq 2018, 2020). This paper adduces the first results from a typological study and data from Bambara in support of this claim. In addition, the Bambara data also point to the morphological realisation of present or default tense, to a hierarchy for tense and to a position for sentential negation in that hierarchy.
Keywords: negation, tam , Bambara, typology, nanosyntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Negation and tam
  • 3.Typological investigation
  • 4.Towards an analysis
    • 4.1Interpreting the typological data
    • 4.2Negative markers and tense: Support from Bambara
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 27 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00038.cle
References (26)
References
Baker, Mark. 1985. “The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 161: 373–415.Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander, eds. 2018. Exploring Nano-syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel. 2009. “The nanosyntax of case.” PhD diss., University of Tromsø, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd. 2019. “The fine structure of the comparative.” Studia Linguistica 73(3): 470–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chumbow, Beban S. & Pius N. Tamanji. 1994. “Bafut.” Typological studies in negation, ed. by Peter Kahrel & René Van den Berg. 211–236. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Clercq, Karen. 2018. “Syncretisms and the morphosyntax of negation.” Exploring Nano-syntax, ed. by Lena Baunaz, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander. 180–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2020. The Morphosyntax of Negative Markers. A Nanosyntactic Account. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2011. “Negative morphemes.” The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. URL [URL]
Dumestre, Gérard. 2003. Grammaire fondamentale du bambara. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Ermisch, Sonja. 2013. “The structure of Bambara.” URL [URL]. Handout Budapest.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 2001. A Natural History of Negation. 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, John. 1985. “Negation.” Language typology and syntactic description. Clause structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen. 197–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prokhorov, Kirill. 2014. “Focalization particles in bambara.” Mandenkan. Bulletin semestriel d’études linguistiques mandé (521): 60–72.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2004. “Two types of negation in Bengali.” Clause Structure in South Asian Languages, ed. by Veneeta Dayal & Anoop Mahayan. 39–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. “Speech act distinctions in grammar.” Language Typology and Syntactic Description I: Clause Structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen. vol. 11, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2009. “Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language.” Nordlyd 361: 1–6.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Towards an elegant solution to language variation: Variation reduces to the size of lexically stored trees.” Ms., Tromsø University.Google Scholar
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido, Michal Starke, Karen De Clercq & Pavel Caha. 2020. “How to be positive.” Glossa 5(1): 231. 1–34.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. “Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of Romance languages.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
. 1996. “On the relevance of tense for sentential negation.” Parameters and Functional Heads, ed. by Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 181–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Joris, Glen, Stefaan Vercoutere, Orphée De Clercq, Kristin Van Damme, Peter Mechant & Lieven De Marez
2022. Nudging Towards Exposure Diversity: Examining the Effects of News Recommender Design on Audiences’ News Exposure Behaviours and Perceptions. Digital Journalism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.