Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 90–102

On the Dutch temporal adverbial goed en wel

| University of Groningen
| Meertens Instituut
The paper investigates the origin, the development, the semantics and the pragmatics of the temporal use of the Dutch expression goed en wel ‘good and well’. We argue that the expression has developed from a meaning “safe and sound” into an indicator of the end of a preparatory phase or transition period, as well as a marker of the beginning of a new state. We observe that temporal goed en wel always requires a secondary state of affairs that is temporally related to the transition point initiating the primary state of affairs, and we show that the expression is increasingly being employed for rhetorical purposes.
Keywords: temporal expression, Dutch, transition period, rhetoric, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Origin of temporal goed en wel
  • 3.Diachronic developments
  • 4. Semantics of goed en wel
  • 5. Pragmatics of goed en wel
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 27 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00039.hoe
References (14)
References
Bos, Gijsbertha. 1964. Het probleem van de samengestelde zin. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2018. “Asymmetrical coordination: Syntax/semantics and pragmatics.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 23(3): 325–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. “A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization.” In New reflections on grammaticalization ed. by I. Wischer & G. Diewald. 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1989. “German schon-erst-noch: An Integrated Analysis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12(2): 167–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malepaard, Joop. 2008. “Anticipatie en versnelde successie als referentie van inverse disjuncties met nog niet en nog niet eens .” Voortgang XXVI1, 253–297.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Atsuko & Jean-Pierre Koenig. 2010. “What Is a Perfect State?” Language 86 (3): 611–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Roland. 2015. “Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture.” Proceedings of Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-3), 28–34.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 1985. The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. “Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization.” Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan. 1993. “‘Already’ and ‘still’: beyond duality.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16(6): 613–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welschen, Ad. 1999. Duale syntaxis en polaire contractie. Negatief gebonden of-constructies in het Nederlands. PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
WNT = de Vries, Matthias & Lammert A. te Winkel [e.a.] (eds.). 1864–1998. Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. ‘s-Gravenhage [etc.]: Martinus Nijhoff [etc.].
Van der Wouden, Ton. 2000. “Focus on appendices in Dutch.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2000 ed. by H. de Hoop and T. Van der Wouden. 233–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2020. “ All good and well: Introducing an objection in Dutch.” This volume1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wouden, Ton van der
2020.  All good and well . Linguistics in the Netherlands 37 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.