Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 21–39

The discourse structure of free indirect discourse reports

| University of Groningen
| University of Groningen
| University of Groningen
We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse structural Attribution analysis.
Keywords: speech/attitude reports, discourse structure, free indirect discourse, SDRT, narrative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The pragmatic context split approach to Free Indirect Discourse
  • 3.The discourse structure of reporting constructions
    • 3.1Basic SDRT and discourse relations
    • 3.2The discourse structure of speech and attitude reports
  • 4.The discourse structure of FID reports
  • 5.The experiment: Discourse relations in FID and ID
    • 5.1Methods
      • 5.1.1Participants
      • 5.1.2Materials and design
      • 5.1.3Predictions
      • 5.1.4Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00048.bim
References

References

Abrusán, Márta
2019 “Computing Perspective Shift in Narrative.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, & Alex Lascarides
2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann
1982 Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
Bary, Corien, & Emar Maier
2020 “The Landscape of Speech Reporting.” Ms. Nijmegen/Groningen. https://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/003526
Christensen, R. H. B.
2019 “Ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R Package Version 2019.12–10.” https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=ordinal
Cumming, Samuel
2019 “Narrative and Point of View.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B.
2017 “Viewpoint phenomena in constructions and discourse.” Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1): 37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
2016 “Discourse viewpoint as network.” Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities 131: 40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2014 The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse: How Texts Allow Us to Mind-Read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
2003 The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan
2017 “Prominent Protagonists.” Journal of Pragmatics, 1541: 79–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1979 “Coherence and Coreference.” Cognitive Science 3 (1): 67–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Julie
2016 “Reports in Discourse.” Dialogue & Discourse 7 (4): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Julie, Nicholas Asher, Brian Reese, and Pascal Denis
2006 “Evidentiality and Intensionality: Two Uses of Reportative Constructions in Discourse.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse: 99–106. Maynooth: National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi
2015 “Perspective-Shifting and Free Indirect Discourse: Experimental Investigations.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 251: 346–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989 Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein: 481–563. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde, and Jeffrey L. Elman
2008 “Coherence and Coreference Revisited.” Journal of Semantics 25 (1): 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kehler, Andrew and Hannah Rohde
2013 “A Probabilistic Reconciliation of Coherence-Driven and Centering-Driven Theories of Pronoun Interpretation.” Theoretical Linguistics 39 (1–2): 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koev, Todor
2013 Apposition and the Structure of Discourse. Rutgers University PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher
2008 “Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure.” Computing Meaning, 87–124: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar
2015 “Quotation and Unquotation in Free Indirect Discourse.” Mind & Language 30 (3): 345–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miltsakaki, Eleni
2001 “Centering in Greek.” Proceedings of The 15th International Symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2012 “The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends.” Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective ed. by B. Dancygier and E. Sweetser: 1771. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, Despina, Eleni Peristeri, Evagelia Plemenou, Theodoros Marinis, and Ianthi Tsimpli
2015 “Pronoun Ambiguity Resolution in Greek: Evidence from Monolingual Adults and Children.” Lingua 1551: 98–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2019 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Redeker, Gisela
1996 “Free indirect discourse in newspaper reports.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996: 221–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José & Gisela Redeker
1996 “Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse.” Spaces, worlds and grammar ed. by G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 290–317. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2004 “Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present.” Mind & Language 19 (3): 279–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael
2008 “The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.” Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3): 353–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy
2007 “Observations on Embedding Verbs, Evidentiality, and Presupposition.” Lingua 117 (6): 1034–1056. CrossrefGoogle Scholar