Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 21–39

The discourse structure of free indirect discourse reports

| University of Groningen
| University of Groningen
| University of Groningen
We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse structural Attribution analysis.
Keywords: speech/attitude reports, discourse structure, free indirect discourse, SDRT, narrative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The pragmatic context split approach to Free Indirect Discourse
  • 3.The discourse structure of reporting constructions
    • 3.1Basic SDRT and discourse relations
    • 3.2The discourse structure of speech and attitude reports
  • 4.The discourse structure of FID reports
  • 5.The experiment: Discourse relations in FID and ID
    • 5.1Methods
      • 5.1.1Participants
      • 5.1.2Materials and design
      • 5.1.3Predictions
      • 5.1.4Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00048.bim
References (31)
References
Abrusán, Márta. 2019. “Computing Perspective Shift in Narrative.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
Bary, Corien, & Emar Maier. 2020. “The Landscape of Speech Reporting.” Ms. Nijmegen/Groningen. [URL]
Christensen, R. H. B. 2019. “Ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R Package Version 2019.12–10.” [URL]
Cumming, Samuel. 2019. “Narrative and Point of View.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. 2017. “Viewpoint phenomena in constructions and discourse.” Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1): 37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2016. “Discourse viewpoint as network.” Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities 131: 40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2014. The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse: How Texts Allow Us to Mind-Read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2003. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2017. “Prominent Protagonists.” Journal of Pragmatics, 1541: 79–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R. 1979. “Coherence and Coreference.” Cognitive Science 3 (1): 67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Julie. 2016. “Reports in Discourse.” Dialogue & Discourse 7 (4): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Julie, Nicholas Asher, Brian Reese, and Pascal Denis. 2006. “Evidentiality and Intensionality: Two Uses of Reportative Constructions in Discourse.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse: 99–106. Maynooth: National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi. 2015. “Perspective-Shifting and Free Indirect Discourse: Experimental Investigations.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 251: 346–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein: 481–563. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde, and Jeffrey L. Elman. 2008. “Coherence and Coreference Revisited.” Journal of Semantics 25 (1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehler, Andrew and Hannah Rohde. 2013. “A Probabilistic Reconciliation of Coherence-Driven and Centering-Driven Theories of Pronoun Interpretation.” Theoretical Linguistics 39 (1–2): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koev, Todor. 2013. Apposition and the Structure of Discourse. Rutgers University PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher. 2008. “Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure.” Computing Meaning, 87–124: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, Emar. 2015. “Quotation and Unquotation in Free Indirect Discourse.” Mind & Language 30 (3): 345–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miltsakaki, Eleni. 2001. “Centering in Greek.” Proceedings of The 15th International Symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2012. “The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends.” Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective ed. by B. Dancygier and E. Sweetser: 1771. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, Despina, Eleni Peristeri, Evagelia Plemenou, Theodoros Marinis, and Ianthi Tsimpli. 2015. “Pronoun Ambiguity Resolution in Greek: Evidence from Monolingual Adults and Children.” Lingua 1551: 98–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Redeker, Gisela. 1996. “Free indirect discourse in newspaper reports.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996: 221–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José & Gisela Redeker. 1996. “Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse.” Spaces, worlds and grammar ed. by G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 290–317. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2004. “Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present.” Mind & Language 19 (3): 279–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Yael. 2008. “The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.” Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3): 353–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2007. “Observations on Embedding Verbs, Evidentiality, and Presupposition.” Lingua 117 (6): 1034–1056. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Abrusán, Márta
2023. Plural and Quantified Protagonists in Free Indirect Discourse and Protagonist Projection. Journal of Semantics 40:1 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.