Article in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 8197
References

References

Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Gerlof
2008Starting a sentence in Dutch. A corpus study of subject- and object-fronting. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby
2019Pronouns raising and emerging. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby, Rachael Tatman & Rik Koncel-Kedziorski
2016 “We who tweet: Pronominal relative clauses on Twitter.” In: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Fest: 17–21. Bloomington, Indiana. Retrieved from http://​ceur​-ws​.org​/Vol​-1607​/conrod​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Felser, Claudia, Harald Clahsen & Thomas F. Münte
2003 “Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German.” Brain and Language 87: 345–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Tineke M. Snijders & Helen de Hoop
2016 “How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study.” Brain & Language 163: 22–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Thijs Trompenaars, Sebastiaan Collin, Kees de Schepper, Helen de Hoop
2020 “Hypercorrection as a by-product of education.” Applied Linguistics 41: 552–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas
1993 “Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (2): 196–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan
1987Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Meulen, Marten
2018 “Do we want more or less variation? The comparative markers als and dan in Dutch prescriptivism since 1900.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018: 79–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2004 “Congruentie-effecten in uitbreidende en vrije relatieve zinnen.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 9: 29–47.Google Scholar
2006 “The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 229–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1988The first Case: the nominative as a default Case and consequences for control theory. MA-thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar