Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 8197
References (14)
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Gerlof. 2008. Starting a sentence in Dutch. A corpus study of subject- and object-fronting. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby. 2019. Pronouns raising and emerging. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Conrod, Kirby, Rachael Tatman & Rik Koncel-Kedziorski. 2016. “We who tweet: Pronominal relative clauses on Twitter.” In: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Fest: 17–21. Bloomington, Indiana. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia, Harald Clahsen & Thomas F. Münte. 2003. “Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German.” Brain and Language 871: 345–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Tineke M. Snijders & Helen de Hoop. 2016. “How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study.” Brain & Language 1631: 22–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Thijs Trompenaars, Sebastiaan Collin, Kees de Schepper, Helen de Hoop. 2020. “Hypercorrection as a by-product of education.” Applied Linguistics 411: 552–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Robert & Marta Kutas. 1993. “Bridging the gap: evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (2): 196–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Meulen, Marten. 2018. “Do we want more or less variation? The comparative markers als and dan in Dutch prescriptivism since 1900.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018: 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2004. “Congruentie-effecten in uitbreidende en vrije relatieve zinnen.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 91: 29–47.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion.” Linguistic Inquiry 371: 229–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1988. The first Case: the nominative as a default Case and consequences for control theory. MA-thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar