Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 114–127
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 114–127
French as a foreign language in the Netherlands
An L2 or an L3? A study on crosslinguistic influences from Dutch and English
Exposure to English is more extensive in today’s society than to French. In this study we investigated crosslinguistic influences from Dutch and/or English to language performances in French as a foreign language, while controlling for language proficiency in French, English and Dutch, and exposure to English.
We tested Dutch learners of French (n = 65) with respect to the acceptability of reduced relative clauses and attachment preferences in full relative clauses. The results showed crosslinguistic influence in the acceptability task and the preference task from English and Dutch respectively. Furthermore, language proficiency in English seems to affect attachment preferences in French. We concluded that these findings support the Linguistic Proximity Model (Westergaard et al. 2017) and that French in Dutch secondary education might be a third language, instead of a second language.
Keywords: Transfer, L3 acquisition, French, Foreign Language Education
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Source of transfer in L3 acquisition
- 3.Reduced relative clauses and attachment preferences in Dutch, English and French
- 3.1Structural differences
- 3.2Research questions and hypotheses
- 4.Method
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Materials and Procedures
- Acceptability task
- Attachment preference task
- 4.3Data analysis
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (18)
Bardel, Camilla & Ylva Falk. 2007. “The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax.” Second Language Research 23 (4): 459–484. 
Birdsong, David & James E. Flege. 2001. “Regular-irregular dissociations in L2 acquisition of English morphology.” Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development: 123–132.
Bowerman, Bruce L. & Richard T. O’connell. 1990. Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Brooks/Cole.
Brysbaert, Marc & Don C. Mitchell. 1996. “Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 49 (3): 664–695.
Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee & Cheryl Frenck-Mestre. 2014. “Phonological and orthographic cues enhance the processing of inflectional morphology. ERP evidence from L1 and L2 French.” Frontiers in Psychology 51: 888.
Frazier, Lyn & Charles Clifton. 1996. Construal. Cambridge: Mit Press.
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl. 2004. “Ambiguities and anomalies: What can eye-movements and event-related potentials reveal about second language sentence processing?”. Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives ed. by Judith Kroll & Annette De Groot, 268–284. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
George, Darren & Mallery, Paul. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hermas, Abdelkader. 2010. “Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state.” International Journal of Multilingualism 7 (4): 343–362.
Kellerman, Eric. 1977. “Towards a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning.” Interlanguage Studies Bulletin: 58–145.
Mulder, Gerben. 2020. “The New Statistics for applied linguistics.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (1–2): 79–96.
Rah, Anne & Dany Adone. 2010. “Processing of the reduced relative clause versus main verb ambiguity in L2 learners at different proficiency levels.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition: 79–109.
Ranong, Sirirat Na & Yan-kit Ingrid Leung. 2009. “Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem.” Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar: 162–191.
Stadt, Rosalinde, Aafke Hulk & Petra Sleeman. 2016. “The influence of L2 English and immersion education on L3 French in the Netherlands.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 33 (1): 152–165.
. 2018. “The influence of L2 English on L3 French acquisition in bilingual education.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 227–245.
Stadt, Rosalinde. 2019. The influence of Dutch (L1) and English (L2) on third language learning: The effects of education, development and language combinations. Utrecht: LOT.
Swets, Benjamin, Timothy Desmet, Charles Clifton & Fernanda Ferreira. 2008. “Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading.” Memory & Cognition 36 (1): 201–216.
Westergaard, Marit, Natalia Mitrofanova, Roksolana Mykhaylyk & Yulia Rodina. 2017. “Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model.” International Journal of Bilingualism 21 (6): 666–682.