Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 2138
Audring, Jenny
2009Reinventing pronoun gender. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT publications.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker
2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen
2020 “Het verlies van een persoonlijk voornaamwoord*.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 25 (2): 355–362, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delignette-Muller, Marie Laure & Christophe Dutang
2015fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software 64 (4): 1–34, [URL]
2021 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (ANS), versie 3.1 2021, <[URL]
Ferreira, Fernanda & John M. Henderson
1990 “Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.” Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition 16 (4): 555–568, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giner, Göknur & Gordon K. Smyth
2016statmod: Probability Calculations for the Inverse Gaussian Distribution. R Journal 8 (1): 339–351 (29 March 2022). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Paul van Gent & Roeland van Hout
2022 “On the Inevitability of Social Meaning and Ideology in Accounts of Syntactic Change: Evidence from Pronoun Competition in Netherlandic Dutch.” In Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, Tanya Karoli Christensen & Torben Juel Jensen. (eds), 120–143, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, F. L. M. P. & H. J. Bennis
2014 “Goed of fout. Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 19 (2): 131–184, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy & Helen de Hoop
2013 “The effect of prescriptivism on comparative markers in spoken Dutch.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 301: 89–101, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Theresa Redl, Hugo de Vos, Lukas Reinarz & Helen de Hoop
2020b “Processing Prescriptively Incorrect Comparative Particles: Evidence From Sentence-Matching and Eye-Tracking.” Frontiers in Psychology 111, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, T. M. Snijders & H. de Hoop
2016 “How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study.” Brain and Language 1631, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy, Thijs Trompenaars, Sebastian Collin, Kees de Schepper & Helen de Hoop
2020a “Hypercorrection as a by-product of education.” Applied Linguistics 41 (4): 552–574, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., P. A. Carpenter & J. D. Woolley
1982 “Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.” Journal of experimental psychology. General 111 (2): 228–238, [URL] DOI logo
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
2017lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13), DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, Russell v.
2021emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means.Google Scholar
Lo, Steson & Sally Andrews
2015 “To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data.” Frontiers in Psychology 61: 1171, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2008R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, [URL]
Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan T.
accepted). “Linguistic judgments in 3D: The aesthetic quality, linguistic acceptability, and surface probability of stigmatized and non-stigmatized variation.” Linguistics.
van Casteren, Maaarten & Matthew H. Davis
2006 “Mix, a program for pseudorandomization.” Behavior Research Methods 38 (4): 584–589, DOI logoGoogle Scholar