Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 174191
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4”. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1): 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje & Hans R. Bosker
2018 “Linguistic expectation management in online discourse processing: An investigation of Dutch inderdaad ‘indeed’ and eigenlijk ‘actually’.” Journal of Memory and Language 1031: 191–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje, Rik Van Gijn, Lotte Hogeweg & Sander Lestrade
2011 “Discourse marking and the subtle art of mind reading: the case of Dutch eigenlijk.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3877–3892. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje & Lotte Hogeweg
2021 “Managing interpersonal discourse expectations: A comparative analysis of contrastive discourse particles in Dutch.” Linguistics 59 (2): 333–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buysse, Lieven
2012 “ ‘So’ as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13): 1764–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press syndicate of the university of Cambridge [e-book].Google Scholar
CGN
2006 Corpus Gesproken Nederlands, version 2.0. [URL].
Diewald, Gabriele
2013 “Same same but different.” Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization.” In: Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea. (eds.), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 19–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diskin, Chloé
2017 “The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker ‘like’ by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland”. Journal of Pragmatics 1201: 144–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2010 “Partikels volgens de schijf van vijf.” Internationale Neerlandistiek, 48 (2): 41–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, John
2003 “Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (15): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E.
2010 “Discourse Markers across Speakers and Settings.” Language and Linguistics Compass 4 (5): 269–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogeweg, Lotte, Helen de Hoop, Stefanie Ramachers, Frans van der Slik Verena & Wottrich
2016 “The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch ”. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54 (3): 201–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, Rune H. B. Christensen
2017 “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software, 82 (13): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2017R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Rasenberg, Marlou, Joost Rommers & Geertje van Bergen
2020 “Anticipating predictability: an ERP investigation of expectation-managing discourse markers in dialogue comprehension.” Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 35 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christoph
2020 “Een afscheidsbrief aan de Britten: Lief Verenigd Koninkrijk”. Trouw, January 31, Retrieved from [URL]
Tsai, Pei-Shu & Wo-Hsin Chu
2017 “The use of discourse markers among Mandarin Chinese teachers, and Chinese as a second language and Chinese as a foreign language learners.” Applied Linguistics 38 (5): 638–665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UCLA and Statistical Consulting Group
2011R Library Contrast Coding Systems for Categorical Variables. Available at: [URL] (accessed July 29, 2019).
Wickham, Hadley
2016ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York 2016 DOI logoGoogle Scholar