Article in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 178196
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4”. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1): 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje & Hans R. Bosker
2018 “Linguistic expectation management in online discourse processing: An investigation of Dutch inderdaad ‘indeed’ and eigenlijk ‘actually’.” Journal of Memory and Language 1031: 191–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje, Rik Van Gijn, Lotte Hogeweg & Sander Lestrade
2011 “Discourse marking and the subtle art of mind reading: the case of Dutch eigenlijk.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3877–3892. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje & Lotte Hogeweg
2021 “Managing interpersonal discourse expectations: A comparative analysis of contrastive discourse particles in Dutch.” Linguistics 59 (2): 333–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press syndicate of the university of Cambridge [e-book].Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2013 “Same same but different.” Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization.” In: Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea. (eds.), Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, 19–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diskin, Chloé
2017 “The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker ‘like’ by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland”. Journal of Pragmatics 1201: 144–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006 “Approaches to Discourse particles.” Studies in pragmatics 11: 1–498. Retrieved from https://​www​.elsevier​.com/. Crossref
Foolen, Ad
2010 “Partikels volgens de schijf van vijf.” Internationale Neerlandistiek, 48 (2): 41–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, John
2003 “Effect Displays in R for Generalised Linear Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 8 (15): 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E.
2010 “Discourse Markers across Speakers and Settings.” Language and Linguistics Compass 4 (5): 269–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogeweg, Lotte, Helen de Hoop, Stefanie Ramachers, Frans van der Slik Verena & Wottrich
2016 “The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch ”. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 54 (3). 201–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, Rune H. B. Christensen
2017 “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software, 82 (13): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, Daniel, Landrigan, Jon-Frederick, & Britt, Allison E.
2017 “Taxonomic and Thematic Semantic Systems.” Psychological Bulletin 43 (5): 499–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2018R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rasenberg, Marlou, Joost Rommers & Geertje van Bergen
2020 “Anticipating predictability: an ERP investigation of expectation-managing discourse markers in dialogue comprehension.” Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 35 (1): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christoph
2020 “Een afscheidsbrief aan de Britten: Lief Verenigd Koninkrijk”. Trouw, January 31, Retrieved from https://​www​.trouw​.nl/
UCLA and Statistical Consulting Group
2011R Library Contrast Coding Systems for Categorical Variables. Available at: https://​stats​.idre​.ucla​.edu​/r​/library​/r​-library​-contrast​-coding​-systems​-for​-categorical​-variables​/#SIMPLE (accessed July 29, 2019).
Wickham, Hadley
2016ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York 2016 CrossrefGoogle Scholar