Article in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 197213
References
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana
2014 “Weak definites semantics, lexicon and pragmatics”. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts
2014 “Advances in weak referentiality.” Weak Referentiality ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Audring, Jenny
Broekhuis, Hans & Marcel den Dikken
2020 “The definite article in inalienable possession constructions”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, https://​taalportaal​.org​/taalportaal​/topic​/link​/syntax​__Dutch​__np​__n5​__nouns5​_Determiners​.5​.1​.4​.4​.xml
Ciot, Morgane, Morgan Sonderegger & Derek Ruths
2013 “Gender Inference of Twitter Users in Non-English Contexts.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 1136–1145.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
2001 “Kinship in grammar”. Dimensions of Possession ed. by Irène Baron, Michael Herslund and Finn Sørensen. 201–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten van den Toorn
2019 “Het bezittelijk voornaamwoord (possessief pronomen).” Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, January 2019, https://​e​-ans​.ivdnt​.org​/topics​/pid​/ans0505lingtopic
Hunt, Matthew & Eric K. Action
2022 “ ‘How’s the wife?’: Pragmatic reasoning in spousal reference”. Journal of Pragmatics 1881: 152–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le Bruyn, Bert
2014Inalienable possession. The semantics of the definite article. Weak referentiality, ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre & Marten van der Meulen
2018 “De kleuter en de peuter – nog meer afstandelijkheid in relaties”. De Taalpassie van Milfje, 23 August 2018, https://​milfje​.blogspot​.com​/2018​/08​/de​-kleuter​-en​-de​-peuter​-nog​-meer​.html
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera
2016The syntax of external and internal possessor variation in German inalienable possession. STUF 69(1), 113–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McConvell, Patrick
2013 “Introduction. Kinship Change in Anthropology and Linguistics.” Kinship systems. Change and reconstruction ed. by Patrick McConvell, Ian Keen and Rachel Hendery. 1–18. Utah: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi
1999 “External Possession: What, Where, How, and Why”. External Possession ed. by Doris L. Payne and Immanuel Barshi. 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Read, Dwight
2013 “A New Approach to Forming a Typology of Kinship Terminology Systems: From Morgan and Murdock to the Present.” Structure and Dynamics 6(1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, Jolien
2018 “The ins and outs of external possession: A micro-comparative perspective”. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Statista
2022 “Twitter: Distribution of global audiences 2021, by gender.” Accessed 1 February 2022. https://​www​.statista​.com​/statistics​/828092​/distribution​-of​-users​-on​-twitter​-worldwide​-gender/
Van der Meulen, Marten & Sterre Leufkens
2018 “De vriend en ik”. De Taalpassie van Milfje, 16 August 2018, http://​milfje​.blogspot​.com​/2018​/08​/de​-vriend​-en​-ik​.html
Van Veen, Piet
1929Fouten: oorspronkelijke roman. Amsterdam: Nederlandsche Uitgevers-maatschap. https://​resolver​.kb​.nl​/resolve​?urn​=MMKB18A:020483000:00007
Zamal, Faiyaz A., Wendy Liu & Derek Ruths
2012 “Homophily and Latent Attribute Inference: Inferring Latent Attributes of Twitter Users from Neighbors.” Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 6(1): 387–390.Google Scholar