Toward a supralexical analysis of the repetitive/restitutive ambiguity
Syntactic decomposition theories of argument structure take predicates to be syntactically complex, consisting of
a root and one or more functional heads. Traditionally, these functional heads have been used as potential attachment sites for
adverbs, such as the repetitive adverb again, giving rise to the repetitive/restitutive ambiguity. In this paper,
I question the assumption that these functional heads provide sublexical attachment sites based on theoretical and empirical
objections. Taking both the scope of the adverb and effects of focus into account, I present a supralexical approach to the
ambiguity. Discussing novel data of two Dutch repetitive adverbs as well as a repetitive verbal prefix, I argue that
again has a default restitutive reading that becomes repetitive if the adverb scopes over the object or if
focus is placed on the adverb. This research has implications for syntactic decomposition approaches to argument structure.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The repetitive/restitutive ambiguity of again
- 2.1The effect of scope
- 2.2The effect of focus
- 3.Syntactic decomposition
- 4.Structure in the Minimalist Program
- 5.Toward a supralexical analysis of the repetitive/restitutive ambiguity
- 5.1The meaning of the adverb
- 5.2The effect of scope
- 5.3The effect of focus
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References