Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 263–284
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 263–284
Degrees and manners as kinds
Evidence from Dutch equatives
We examine equative constructions in Dutch, comparing it to their counterparts in two other Germanic languages, namely English and German. We observe that there is significant variation in the morphosyntax of equative constructions based on whether what is being compared is a gradable adjective or a verb (e.g. Kim is as tall as Sue and Kim ran as Sue (did)) across the three languages and that the morphosyntax corresponds to meaning differences, determining what exactly can be compared in these constructions. Based on these observations, we propose an account for Dutch equative constructions based on eventuality kinds, which has implications for the semantics of comparison constructions in general in relation to the ontological status of degrees and manners in the grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Degrees and manners in Dutch equatives
- 3.Previous analyses of degrees and manners across Germanic
- 3.1English
- 3.2German
- 4.Degrees and manners as kinds
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (14)
Anderson, C. & Morzycki, M. 2015. Degrees as kinds. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 331:791–828. 
Bresnan, J. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 41:275–343.
Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4):339–405.
Chomsky, N. 1977. On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., editors, Formal syntax, pages 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Haspelmath, M. & Buchholz, O. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In van der Auwera, J. & O Baoill, D., editors, Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, pages 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heim, I. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
2000. Degree operators and scope. In Jackson, B. & Matthews, T., editors, Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory conference, pages 40–64. Ithaca: Cornell University.
2006. Remarks on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Hohaus, V. & Zimmermann, M. 2021. Comparisons of equality with German so…wie, and the relationship between degrees and properties. Journal of Semantics, 381:95–143.
Kennedy, C. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kennedy, C. & Levin, B. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In McNally, L. & Kennedy, C., editors, Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, pages 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rett, J. 2013. Similatives and the argument structure of verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 311:1101–1137.
Umbach, C., Hinterwimmer, S., and Gust, H. 2022. German wie-complements: Manners, methods and events in progress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 401:307–343.
Wellwood, A. 2015. On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics & Philosophy, 381:67–101.