Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects: Predicting judgments from objective measures

Tang, Chaoju; van Heuven, Vincent J.

doi:10.1075/avt.24.21tan

Article published In:

Linguistics in the Netherlands 2007
Edited by Bettelou Los and Marjo van Koppen
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 24] 2007
► pp. 223–234

Mutual intelligibility and similarity of Chinese dialects

Predicting judgments from objective measures

Chaoju Tang | Chongqing Jiaotong University

Vincent J. van Heuven | University of Leiden/LUCL

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 30 October 2007

https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.24.21tan

Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Order by:

Elvira-García, Wendy, Simone Balocco, Paolo Roseano & Ana Ma. Fernández-Planas

2018. ProDis: A dialectometric tool for acoustic prosodic data. Speech Communication 97 ► pp. 9 ff.

Feleke, Tekabe Legesse, Charlotte Gooskens & Stefan Rabanus

2020. Mapping the dimensions of linguistic distance: A study on South Ethiosemitic languages. Lingua 243 ► pp. 102893 ff.

Golubović, Jelena & Charlotte Gooskens

2015. Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages. Russian Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 351 ff.

Gooskens, Charlotte

2013. Experimental Methods for Measuring Intelligibility of Closely Related Language Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 195 ff.

Gooskens, Charlotte, Wilbert Heeringa & Karin Beijering

2008. Phonetic and Lexical Predictors of Intelligibility. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2:1-2 ► pp. 63 ff.

Peng, Fei, Lili Kang, Jinhai Shi & Ming Liu

2023. Cultural Distance, Classroom Silence and Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Education: Evidences from Migrant College Students in Shanghai. Behavioral Sciences 13:3 ► pp. 193 ff.

Sabbah Qamri

2021. Dialectal intelligibility of Assamese tested functionally. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics 2:4 ► pp. 9 ff.

Tang, Chaoju

2014. The use of Chinese dialects. In Above and Beyond the Segments, ► pp. 302 ff.

van Heuven, Vincent J.

2008. Making Sense of Strange Sounds: (Mutual) Intelligibility of Related Language Varieties. A Review. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2:1-2 ► pp. 39 ff.

Xu, Ke, Sigfrid D. Soli, Yun Zheng, Shixi Liu, Gang Li, Yong Tao & Zhaoli Meng

2015. Quantification of the effects of Mandarin dialect differences on the use of norm-referenced speech perception tests. International Journal of Audiology 54:7 ► pp. 461 ff.

Zeng, Cheng & Stephen M. Croucher

2017. An exploration of organization dissent and workplace freedom of speech among young professional intra-urban migrants in Shanghai. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 10:3 ► pp. 201 ff.

Zeng, Wenqi, Christine Shea, Jill Beckman & Ethan Kutlu

2024. Bidialectal variety switching: the effects of language use and social contexts. Frontiers in Language Sciences 2

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.