Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2014
Edited by Anita Auer and Björn Köhnlein
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 31] 2014
► pp. 78–92

Resultative constructions in heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands

| Radboud University Nijmegen
Domains where languages have two or more competing syntactic constructions expressing the same meaning may be problematic for bilingual heritage speakers. One such variable domain is the resultative constructions in heritage Ambon Malay, a variety spoken in the Netherlands by Dutch-Ambon Malay bilinguals. In Ambon Malay, resultatives are expressed mostly by means of verb serialization (SVC), although resultative prepositional phrases (PP) and adjectival phrases (AP) also occur. In Dutch, resultative constructions usually involve verb particles, PPs and APs. This overlap of structures poses the conditions for transfer effects between the two languages. The frequency distribution of SVCs, PPs and APs is investigated in semi-spontaneous speech from heritage speakers of Ambon Malay and compared to that of baseline speakers. Heritage speakers show an increase in the frequency of constructions shared by both languages (PPs and APs), while they underuse the constructions attested only in the heritage language (SVC).
Keywords: Heritage language, bilingualism, serial verb constructions, Ambon Malay, resultative constructions
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.31.07mor
References (43)
Adelaar, K. Alexander & David J. Prentice. 1996. Malay: Its history, role and spread. In Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell T. Tyron (eds.), Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, Vol. 11, 673–693. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. Dixon (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Backus, Ad. 2004. Convergence as a mechanism of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2). 179–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Dieter. 1986. Can the train ever be stopped again? Developments in the Moluccan community in the Netherlands before and after the hijackings. Indonesia 411. 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown. 2001. Cut and break clips. In Stephen C. Levinson & Nick Enfield (eds.), Manual for the Field Season 2001, 90–96.Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Boumans, Louis. 2006. The attributive possessive in Moroccan Arabic spoken by young bilinguals in the Netherlands and their peers in Morocco. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9(3). 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, 201–235. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elektronische Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (E-ANS). 1997. Version 1.3. Available at [URL] (30 June, 2014).
Ellis, Nick. C. 2006. Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics 27(1). 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 2006. Serial verbs in Tetun Dili. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. Dixon (eds.), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, 239–253. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, Scheffner Carol, Eugene Komaroff, Barbara L. Rodriguez, Lisa M. Lopez, Shelley E. Scarpino & Brian Goldstein. 2012. Predicting Spanish-English Bilingual Children’s Language Abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 551. 1251–1264. DOI logo
Hulsen, Madeleine, Kees de Bot & Bert Weltens. 2002. “Between two worlds.” Social networks, language shift, and language processing in three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1531. 27–52.Google Scholar
Huwaë, Rosita. 1992. Tweetaligheid in Wierden: het taalgebruik van jongeren uit een Molukse gemeenschap. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Jansen, Bert, Josien Lalleman & Pieter Muysken. 1981. The alternation hypothesis: acquisition of Dutch word order by Turkish and Moroccan foreign workers. Language Learning 31(2). 315–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2002. Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors, 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Ingrid & Dieter Wunderlich. 1998. Cross-linguistic patterns of resultatives. Manuscript. Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los. 2003. Particles and prefixes in Dutch and English. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, 79–117. New York: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Susan & Cheryl Anagnopoulos. 1989. Language and aging. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 101. 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lekawael, Rosina. 2011. The development of Moluccan Malay as a heritage language in the Netherlands. Nijmegen: Radboud University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Van Minde, Don. 1997. Malayu Ambong. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2008. Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Francesca R. & Marian Klamer. To appear. Give-constructions in heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands. Journal of Language Contact.
Moro, Francesca R. & Pablo Irizarri van Suchtelen. Under review. Dominant language transfer in heritage languages. Manuscript. DOI logo
Muysken, Pieter. 2005. Possessive constructions in language contact settings. Monash University Linguistics Papers 4(1). 11–19.Google Scholar
. 2013. Language contact outcomes as the result of bilingual optimization strategies. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4). 709–730. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William, Hye-Young Kwak, On-Soon Lee & Miseon Lee. 2011. An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2). 223–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onar Valk, Pelin & Ad Backus. 2013. Syntactic change in an immigrant language: From non-finite to finite subordinate clauses in Turkish. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri . Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 4(2). 7–29.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2008. Gender under incomplete acquisition. Heritage Language Journal 6(1). 40–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Olga Kagan Nei. 2007. Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5). 368–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saitou, Naruya & Masatoshi Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4(4). 406–425.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The limits of convergence in language contact. Journal of Language Contact 2(1). 13–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soolsma, Rowan. 2013. De progressief in het Nederlands en het Moluks Maleis. Nijmegen: Radboud University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Tahitu, Bert. 1989. Melaju Sini. Het Maleis van Molukse jongeren in Nederland. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Theakston, Anna L. 2004. The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development 19(1). 15–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tjia, Johnny. 1997. Verb serialization in Ambonese Malay. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon MA thesis.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1). 61–82.Google Scholar
Veenman, Justus. 1994. The social integration of Moluccans. Rotterdam: Koninklijke Vermande/ISEO.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Keydeniers, Darlene, Suzanne P. Aalberse, Sible Andringa & Folkert Kuiken
2023. Acquiring the Dutch Plural in a Bilingual Setting: Investigating the Effects of Language Dominance, Overlap, and Variability. Languages 8:3 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Mengmeng, Norbert Vanek & Leah Roberts
2021. Crosslinguistic influence on English and Chinese L2 speakers’ conceptualization of event series. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:1 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Moro, Francesca R
2017. Aspectual distinctions in Dutch-Ambon Malay bilingual heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:2 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Moro, Francesca R
2018. Divergence in heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands: The role of social-psychological factors. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:4 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.