Article published in:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 113

Full-text

Dutch impersonal passives
References

References

Achard, M.
2009 “The distribution of French intransitive predicates”. Linguistics 47:3.513–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beliën, M.
2012 “Dutch manner of motion verbs: Disentangling auxiliary choice, telicity, and syntactic function”. Cognitive Linguistics 23:1.1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver & Riet Vos.
2015Verbs and verb phrases (Volume 1). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carnie, A. & H. Harley
2005 “Existential impersonals”. Studia Linguistica 59:1.46–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornelis, Louise & Arie Verhagen
1995 “Does Dutch really have a passive?Linguistics in the Netherlands 1995, ed. by M. den Dikken and K. Hengeveld, 49–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
de Haan, Sies
2000 “Heeft het Nederlands echt geen passief?Samengevoegde woorden ed. by Hans den Besten, Els Elffers and Jan Luif, 111–124. Amsterdam: Leerstoelgroep Nederlandse Taalkunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dowty, D.
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.3:547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn
1997Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
[ p. 13 ]
Kirsner, Robert S.
1976 “On the subjectless ‘pseudo-passive’ in Standard Dutch and the semantics of background agents”. Subject and topic ed. by C. N. Li, 385–415. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kraak, Albert & Willem G. Klooster
1968Syntaxis. Culemborg: Stam-Kemperman.Google Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
1999 “Virtual reality”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29:2.77–103.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
1978 “Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis”. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by J.J. Jaeger, A.C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O.D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E.E. Sweetser, H. Thompson and K.W. Whistler, 157–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollmann, T.
1970 “Passieve zinnen en het geïmpliceerd logisch subject”. Studia Neerlandica 2.34–50.Google Scholar
Primus, B.
2011 “Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives”. Lingua 121.80–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Es, G.A.
1970 “Plaats en functie van de passieve constructie in het syntactisch systeem van het Nederlands”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 86.127–156, 213–233.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
1996 Event semantics of verb frame alternations: A case study of Dutch and its acquisition . Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
van Schaik-Rădulescu, M.
2011 “(Non-)homogeneity in Dutch impersonal passives of unaccusatives”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XIII:1.63–83.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A.
1992 “Praxis of linguistics: Passives in Dutch”. Cognitive Linguistics 3:3.301–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1988Unaccusative verbs in Dutch and the syntax-semantics interface. (= CSLI-88-123) Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Johansson, Annika & Gudrun Rawoens
2019. A corpus-based contrastive study of impersonal passives in Swedish and Dutch. Languages in Contrast 19:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.