Dutch impersonal passives
Beyond volition and atelicity
Dutch impersonal passives are often considered to be only compatible with atelic volitional verbs, such as werken ‘work’, lachen ‘laugh’, and zwemmen ‘swim’. Two recent corpus studies, however, argue that a wider range of verbs is compatible with the construction, presenting examples of attested impersonal passives with telic and non-volitional verbs. This paper lends further support to this view, by providing an exploratory study of the frequencies of different intransitive verbs appearing in the construction, as well as a discussion of the telicity of attested impersonal passives with vallen ‘fall’ and sterven ‘die’. The paper concludes that also with these telic non-volitional verbs, the impersonal passive merely conveys the occurrence of the type of act described by the verb, without specifying whether this occurrence is constituted by a single or multiple events, or whether it involves one or more participants.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Types of verbs claimed to be compatible with the Dutch impersonal passive
- 3.Frequencies of individual intransitive verbs occurring in the impersonal passive
- 4.
Analyzing the telicity of impersonal passives with vallen ‘fall’ and sterven ‘die’
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (19)
References
Achard, M. 2009. “The distribution of French intransitive predicates”. Linguistics 47:3.513–558.
Beliën, M. 2012. “Dutch manner of motion verbs: Disentangling auxiliary choice, telicity, and syntactic function”. Cognitive Linguistics 23:1.1–26.
Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver & Riet Vos. 2015. Verbs and verb phrases (Volume 11). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Carnie, A. & H. Harley. 2005. “Existential impersonals”. Studia Linguistica 59:1.46–65.
Cornelis, Louise & Arie Verhagen. 1995. “Does Dutch really have a passive?” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1995, ed. by M. den Dikken and K. Hengeveld, 49–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
de Haan, Sies. 2000. “Heeft het Nederlands echt geen passief?” Samengevoegde woorden ed. by Hans den Besten, Els Elffers and Jan Luif, 111–124. Amsterdam: Leerstoelgroep Nederlandse Taalkunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.3:547–619.
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Nijhoff.
Kirsner, Robert S. 1976. “On the subjectless ‘pseudo-passive’ in Standard Dutch and the semantics of background agents”. Subject and topic ed. by C. N. Li, 385–415. New York: Academic Press.
Kraak, Albert & Willem G. Klooster. 1968. Syntaxis. Culemborg: Stam-Kemperman.
Langacker, R.W. 1999. “Virtual reality”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29:2.77–103.
Perlmutter, D. 1978. “Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis”. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by J.J. Jaeger, A.C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O.D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E.E. Sweetser, H. Thompson and K.W. Whistler, 157–190.
Pollmann, T. 1970. “Passieve zinnen en het geïmpliceerd logisch subject”. Studia Neerlandica 21.34–50.
Primus, B. 2011. “Animacy and telicity: Semantic constraints on impersonal passives”. Lingua 1211.80–99.
van Es, G.A. 1970. “Plaats en functie van de passieve constructie in het syntactisch systeem van het Nederlands”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 861.127–156, 213–233.
van Hout, Angeliek. 1996.
Event semantics of verb frame alternations: A case study of Dutch and its acquisition
. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.
van Schaik-Rădulescu, M. 2011. “(Non-)homogeneity in Dutch impersonal passives of unaccusatives”. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics XIII:1.63–83.
Verhagen, A. 1992. “Praxis of linguistics: Passives in Dutch”. Cognitive Linguistics 3:3.301–342.
Zaenen, Annie. 1988. Unaccusative verbs in Dutch and the syntax-semantics interface. (= CSLI-88-123) Stanford: CSLI.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Johansson, Annika & Gudrun Rawoens
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.