Deriving verb-cluster variation in Dutch and German
The difference in West-Germanic V(erb)-clusters, right-branching (Dutch) and left-branching (German), follows from a difference in the acquisition of V-second. The decisive factor is a rightward selection of the <+Aux> verbs in Dutch main clauses. That decisive factor had already been acquired before any V-cluster appeared in the child’s speech. Longitudinal Dutch child data show that modals and aspectuals develop a rightward selection that carries over into the V-cluster. The German child data do not show such a development. Automatic phrasal formation by the acquisition procedure allows a V-cluster without assuming V-to-V-movement from an underlying structure. The general perspective is that (i) the acquisition procedure is a discovery procedure, and that (ii) typological effects are the outcome of early local string-determined licensing/selection.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The acquisition perspective. Two types of selection
- 2.1The acquisition path for the root clause in Dutch and German
- 2.2Directionality of selection: A Dutch-German input difference
- 2.3Subordinate clauses and V-clusters
- 3.Triple V-clusters
- 4.The categorial status of the past participle
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
-
References
References
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham
2008 Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Volume 21. Amsterdam: AUP.
Barbiers, Sjef & Hans Bennis
2010 “
De plaats van het werkwoord in zuid en noord”.
Artikelen voor Magda Devos ed. by
Johan De Caluwe &
Jacques Van Keymeulen, 25–42. Gent: Academia.
Barbiers, Sjef, Hans Bennis & Lotte Hendriks
2016 Merging verb cluster variation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Linguistic Variation, 9 February, Utrecht University.
Behrens, H.
2006 “
The input-output relationship in first language acquisition”.
Language and Cognitive Processes 211.2–24.
Berg, B. van den
1949 “
De plaats van het hulpwerkwoord in de voltooide tijden in de Nederlandse bijzin”.
Taal en Tongval 11.155-165.
Besten, H. den & H. Broekhuis
1989 “
Woordvolgorde in de werkwoordelijke eindreeks”.
GLOT 121.79–137.
Blom, Elma
2003 From root infinitive to finite sentence. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Blom, E. & F. Wijnen
2013 “
Optionality of finiteness: Evidence for a no overlap stage in Dutch child language”.
First language 33:3.225–245.
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
2015 Syntax of Dutch. Volume 21. Amsterdam: AUP.
Coussé, E.
2006 “
De historische wortels van de volgordevariatie in het hebben-perfectum”.
Taal en Tongval 581.250–277.
Culicover, Peter
2014 “
Constructions, complexity and word order variation”.
Measuring Linguistic Complexity ed. by1
Frederick Newmeyer &
Laurel Preston, 148–178. OUP.
Evers, Arnold E.
1975 The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. PhD diss., Utrecht University.
Evers, A. E.
2008 “
Vraag aan de Westgermaanse dialectvergelijking”.
Nederlandse Taalkunde 131.188–193.
Evers, Arnold E. & Jacqueline van Kampen
Freudenthal, D., J. Pine, J. Aguado-Orea & F. Gobet
2007 “
Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC”.
Cognitive Science 311.311–341.
Haan, Ger de.
1987 “
A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch”.
Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar III ed. by
Ger de Haan &
Wim Zonneveld, 15–30. Utrecht: OTS.
Hoekstra, Eric
2016 “
Combining with to-infinitives”.
Taalportaal.
[URL].
Jordens, P.
2002 “
Finiteness in early child Dutch”.
Linguistics 401.687–765.
Kampen, Jacqueline van.
1997 First steps in wh-movement. PhD diss. Utrecht University.
Kampen, J. van
2009 “
The non-biological evolution of grammar: Wh-question formation in Germanic”.
Biolinguistics 31.154-185.
Meyer, C. & F. Weerman
in press) “
Cracking the cluster. The acquisition of verb raising in Dutch”.
Nederlandse Taalkunde.
Salustri, Manola & Nina Hyams
Wijnen, F.
1997 “
Functionele categorieën in Nederlandse kindertaal”.
Nederlandse Taalkunde 21.178–198.
Zuckerman, Shalom
2001 The acquisition of ‘optional’ movement. PhD diss., University of Groningen.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.