Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 70–88

Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Dutch

| University of Groningen
This paper presents a new analysis of Dutch comparatives and argues that they should be classified into phrasal and clausal comparatives (as e.g. Hankamer (1973) argues for English). Arguments for this classification come from differences in case marking and island effects. Merchant (2009) notes the same island effects in Greek comparatives, and by applying his analysis to Dutch we can explain the differences between the Dutch phrasal and clausal comparatives. Crucial in this analysis is the ellipsis of underlying structure, not only in the reduced clausal comparative, but also in the phrasal comparative, which reflects the similarity in their interpretation.
Keywords: Dutch comparative constructions, clausal comparatives, phrasal comparatives, syntactic islands, ellipsis, syntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Similarities between Dutch and Greek comparatives
  • 3.Classifying Dutch comparatives
  • 4. Merchant’s (2009) analysis of Greek comparatives
    • 4.1Greek reduced clausal comparatives
    • 4.2Greek phrasal comparatives
  • 5. Merchant’s (2009) analysis applied to Dutch
    • 5.1Dutch phrasal comparatives
    • 5.2Dutch (reduced) clausal comparatives
      • 5.2.1Optionality and ellipsis of dat
    • 5.3Dutch ambiguous transitive comparatives
  • 6.Related puzzles
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.06lin
References (21)
References
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent: The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. PhD diss., Catholic University of Brussels.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Diane Massam. 1999. Multiple case checking. Syntax 21. 65–79.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans. 2013. Syntax of Dutch: Adjectives and adjective phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial pps: the cartography of syntactic structures, 74–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genootschap Onze Taal. 2011. Groter dan jou / jij. [URL] (23 February, 2016).
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than's in English. In Papers from the ninth regional meeting ofthe chicago linguistic society, 179–188.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Petra. 1995. Comparatives and categorial grammar. PhD diss., University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1984. To be continued: The story of the comparative. Journal of Semantics 31. 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapetangianni, Konstantia. 2010. The minimalist syntax of control in Greek. PhD diss., The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In Hilda Koopman (ed.), The syntax of specifiers and heads, 204–260. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(1). 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstract-ness of syntax. Journal of Greek Linguistics 91. 134–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paardekooper, P. C. 1950. Als en dan bij vergelijkingen. De Nieuwe Taalgids 431. 160–167.Google Scholar
1970. Groter als. De Nieuwe Taalgids 631. 160–167.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina. 2008. The place of PLACE in Persian. In Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial p, 305–330. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroop, Jan. 2010. Hun hebben de taal verkwanseld: Over Poldernederlands, 'fout' Nederlands en ABN. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2008. Projections of P. In Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlacil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial p, 63–84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taalunie. 2015. Groter dan mij/ik. [URL] (23 February, 2016).
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2011. The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Joost van de Weijer
2021. Swedish predicative oblique case: default or not?. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 53:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Vaiksnoraite, Elena
2021. A direct analysis of Lithuanian phrasal comparatives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.