Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017
Edited by Sander Lestrade and Bert Le Bruyn
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 34] 2017
► pp. 115
References (19)
References
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology.” Defaults in Morphological Theory. ed. by N. Gisborne & A. Hippisley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Jenny Audring. forthcoming. “Partial motivation, multiple motivation: the role of output schemas in morphology.” The construction of words, Advances in Construction Morphology. ed. by G. Booij. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Jenny Audring. forthcoming. The texture of the lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logo
. 2016. “Morphological schemas: Theoretical and psycholinguistic issues.” The Mental Lexicon 11(3): 467–493. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Jager, Arie de. 1875. Woordenboek der frequentatieven in het Nederlandsch. Gouda: G.B. van Goor.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden, eds. 2011. Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere & Arend Quak. 2003. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther, eds. 2004. Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916/1977. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger. Lausanne and Paris: Payot; trans. by W. Baskin, Course in general linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Moritz & Adolphe Van Loey. 1964. Schönfelds historische grammatica van het Nederlands: Klankleer, vormleer, woordvorming. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2015. “Diminutive verbs in German: semantic analysis and theoretical implications.” Morphology 25(2). 183–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Cavirani-Pots, Cora & Engela De Villiers
2023. Univerbation in Afrikaans verbal diminutives. Linguistics in the Netherlands 40  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK & BILL THOMPSON
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Tarasova, Elizaveta & José A. Sánchez Fajardo
2020. Iconicity and word-formation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Weiyun Wei, Yumeng Wang, Guangyuan Ren & Yunyun Ran
2020. Words are constructions, too: A construction-based approach to English ablaut reduplication. Linguistics 58:6  pp. 1701 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.