Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017
Edited by Sander Lestrade and Bert Le Bruyn
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 34] 2017
► pp. 47–62

The rise of clause-final negation in Flores-Lembata, Eastern Indonesia

| Universiteit Leiden
The Austronesian languages of Flores-Lembata in eastern Indonesia show all three stages of a Jespersen Cycle: some have a negator in pre-predicate position, others in clause-final position, and yet others have embracing double negation. In this article the various negation patterns in the Flores-Lembata languages are described using a sample of nine closely related languages of the region. It examines not only the negative constructions but also the etymology of the negators used, showing historical connections between some of the languages, as well as independent developments in others. On the basis of cross-linguistic evidence, and taking into account the non-Austronesian (Papuan) structures found in these Flores-Lembata languages, it is argued that the clause-final negation in several of these languages was caused by contact with speakers of Papuan languages during an earlier stage.
Keywords: Austronesian languages, contact induced grammaticalization, Jespersen Cycle, clause-final negation, Papuan languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background: Jespersen Cycle
  • 3.Negation patterns in Flores-Lembata languages
    • 3.1Overview of negation patterns
    • 3.2Pre-predicate single negation
    • 3.3Embracing negation
    • 3.4Clause-final single negation
  • 4.Etymology of Flores-Lembata negators
    • 4.1Overview of negators
    • 4.2Pre-predicate negators
    • 4.3Clause-final negators
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.04fri
References (38)
References
Antonius, P., and A. G. Ruskhan. 1997. Struktur bahasa Ngadha dialek Rongga. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.Google Scholar
Arndt, Paul. 1931. Grammatik der Sika-Sprache. Ende: Arnoldus.Google Scholar
. 1937. Grammatik der Solor-Sprache. Ende: Arnoldus.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert, and Stephen Trussel. 2010a. *salaq ‘wrong; miss (a target); mistake’. [URL] (accessed on 10-03-2017).
. 2010b. *ta ‘negative marker: no, not’. [URL] (accessed on 15-11-2016).
Croft, William. 1991. The Evolution of Negation. Journal of Linguistics 271:1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewing, Michael C., and Margaretha Anna Flora Klamer, ed. 2010. East Nusantara: Typological and areal analyses. Number 618 in Pacific linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Australian National University.Google Scholar
Fricke, Hanna. 2014. Topics in the grammar of Hewa: A variety of Sika in Eastern Flores, Indonesia. Munich: Lincom Europe.Google Scholar
. 2016. Corpus of Central Lembata Lamaholot. Leiden University.Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Nouns and pronouns in Central Lembata. Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2008. Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 121:195–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grangé, Philippe. 2015. The Lamaholot dialect chain (East Flores, Indonesia). In Language Change in Austronesian Languages: Papers from 12-ICAL, ed. Malcolm Ross and I Wayan Arka, 35–50. College of Asia and Pacific. The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 271:529–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gary. 2014. Western Pantar. In The Papuan Languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar, ed. Antoinette Schapper, volume 11, 23–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jonker, J. C. G. 1908. Rottineesch-Hollandsch woordenboek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Keraf, Gregorius. 1978. Morfologi Dialek Lamalera. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 2004. East Nusantara: Genetic, Areal, and Typological Approaches. Oceanic Linguistics 431:240–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 2011. A short grammar of Alorese (Austronesian). Munich: Lincom Europe.Google Scholar
. 2012. Papuan-Austronesian language contact: Alorese from an areal perspective. In Melanesian languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the 21th Century, ed. Marian Klamer and Nicholas Evans. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2014. The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Marian, and Gereon Kaiping. 2017. LexiRumah: Lexicon of languages of the Lesser Sunda Islands. [URL] (accessed on 23-3-2017).
Klamer, Marian, Ger Reesink, and Miriam van Staden. 2008. East Nusantara as a linguistic area. In From linguistic areas to areal linguistics, ed. Pieter Muysken, Werner Abraham, and Michael Noonan, number 90 in Studies in language companion series (SLCS), 95–149. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroon, Yosep. 2016. A grammar of Solor Lamaholot: A language of Flores, Eastern Indonesia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Nagaya, Naonori. 2011. The Lamaholot language of Eastern Indonesia. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio, and Herman Kelen. 2007. A grammar of Lamaholot, Eastern Indonesia: The morphology and syntax of the Lewoingu dialect. Munich: Lincom Europe.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger. 2002. Clause-final negation: Structure and interpretation. Functions of Language 91:239–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Laura C., and John Haan. 2014. Adang. In The Papuan Languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar, ed. Antoinette Schapper, volume 11, 221–283. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samely, Ursula. 1991. Kedang, (Eastern Indonesia), some aspects of its grammar. Number Bd. 46 in Forum phoneticum. Hamburg: H. Buske.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette, ed. 2014. The Papuan Languages of Timor, Alor and Pantar, volume 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah, and Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. The Jespersen Cycles. In Cyclical change, ed. Elly van Gelderen, Linguistik aktuell; vol. 1461. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Denies Du Mon. 2015. Negation, Linguistics of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), ed. James D. Wright, 409–414. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Frens Vossen. 2015. Negatives between Chamic and Bahnaric. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 81:24–38.Google Scholar
. 2016. Jespersen cycles in the Mayan, Quechuan and Maipurean languages. In Cyclical change continued, ed. Elly van Gelderen, Linguistics today, volume 2271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, Catherina. 1999. A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun. An Austronesian language of West Timor. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Australian National University.Google Scholar
Vossen, Frens. 2016. On the typology of the Jespersen Cycles. Doctoral, Universiteit van Antwerpen, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Vossen, Frens, and Johan van der Auwera. 2014. The Jespersen Cycles Seen from Austronesian. In The diachrony of negation, ed. Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Jacqueline Visconti, 47–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Klamer, Marian A.F.
2020. Chapter 7. From Lamaholot to Alorese. In Austronesian Undressed [Typological Studies in Language, 129], ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Klamer, Marian
2019. The dispersal of Austronesian languages in Island South East Asia: Current findings and debates. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.