Cover not available
Article published In:
APTIF 9 - Reality vs. Illusion: From Morse code to machine translation
Edited by Frans De Laet, In-kyoung Ahn and Joong-chol Kwak
[Babel 66:4/5] 2020
► pp. 655–673

Building disciplinary knowledge through multimodal presentation

A case study on China’s first interpreting Massive Online Open Course (MOOC)

| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Digital innovations are revolutionizing education, bringing opportunities that are seized across disciplines including conference interpreting training. This research draws a transdisciplinary framework of Legitimation Code Theory and multimodality research to explore how to build and transfer the disciplinary knowledge of interpreting via an on-line course, a staple of today’s education. The paper first conceptualizes the disciplinary knowledge of interpreting as elite code that entails both specialist knowledge of high semantic density and tacit experience of professionals of the trade. Then, drawing on empirical data from the first interpreting MOOC in China, the paper describes how knowledge of different semantic features is built through distinctive patterns of multimodal presentation. Effectiveness of the multimodal presentation of knowledge is then triangulated with learning outcome research. Findings of this paper highlight how multimodal presentation in on-line lectures support the process of learning and hence elicit reflective perspectives on knowledge building of interpreting in the on-line space.
Keywords: disciplinary knowledge of interpreting, MOOC, multimodal complementarity, Legitimation Code Theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research framework
  • 3.Defining disciplinary knowledge of conference interpreting
    • 3.1Specialization: Conference interpreting as elite code
    • 3.2Semantics of conference interpreting training
  • 4.Case study
    • 4.1Consecutive Interpreting, an overview
    • 4.2Semantics and multimodality
    • 4.3Basic concepts
    • 4.4Cases of multimodal interaction
  • 5.Analysis of learning outcomes
    • 5.1Learners’ overall performance
    • 5.2Learning outcomes for note-taking skills
      • 5.2.1Learning concepts and theories
      • 5.2.2Applying skills to practice
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00176.ouy
References (31)
References
Baigorri-Jalón, Jesús. 2015. “The history of the interpreting profession”. In The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, ed. by Mikkelson, Holly; and Renée Jourdenais, 11–28. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1997a/1961. “The Photographic Message”. In Image–Music–Text, ed. by Barthes, Roland, 15–31. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
. 1997b/1964. “Rhetoric of the Image”. In Image–Music–Text, ed. by Barthes, Roland, 32–51. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bearne, Eve; and Wolstencroft, Helen. 2007. Visual Approaches to Teaching Writing Multimodal Literacy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Camilo, Silvia. 2004. “Why trainers should be practicing conference interpreters”. [URL]
Carney, Russell N.; and Levin, Joel R. 2002. “Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students’ Learning from Text”. Educational Psychology Review 14 (1): 5–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chai, Mingjiong. 2019. “Challenges facing translator and interpreter training”. East Journal of Translation 58 (2): 4–7.Google Scholar
Clarence, Sherran. 2016. “Exploring the nature of disciplinary teaching and learning using Legitimation Code Theory Semantics”. Teaching in Higher Education 21 (2): 123–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Laet, Frans. 2014. “Ongoing T & I Training through One Button Conference Modules: Ideas for Multifunctional Database Design, Remote Students Assessment and Networking Development”. In Teaching English Language and Literature at Home and Abroad, ed. by Ho, W. C., 399–417. Taichung: Feng Chia University.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Suzanne; and Napier, Jemina. 2015. Interpreter Education in the Digital Age: Innovation, Access and Change. Washington: Gallaudet UP.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil; and Ian Mason. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Interpreting: A text linguistic approach”. In The Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. by Pöchhacker, Franz; and Miriam Shlesinger, 254–265. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalina, Sylvia. 2000. “Interpreting Competences as a Basis and a Goal for Teaching”. The Interpreters’ Newsletter 101: 3–32.Google Scholar
Lederer, Marianne. 2007. “Can theory help translator and interpreter trainer and trainees?” The interpreter and translator Trainer 1 (1): 15–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, Mary H. 2015. “Interaction and gamification: An evolving intersection with on-line interpreter education”. In Interpreter Education in the Digital Age: Innovation, Access and Change, ed. by Ehrlich, Suzanne; and Jamina Napier, 68–91. Washington (WA): Gallaudet UP.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2013. “Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning”. Linguistics and Education 24 (1): 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.; and Karl Maton. 2017. “Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory on Education: Rethinking field and knowledge structure”. ONOMÁZEIN Número especial LSF y TCL sobre educación y conocimiento: 12–45.Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan; and Salway, Andrew. 2005. “A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media”. Visual Communication 4 (3): 337–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maton, Karl. 2013. “Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge building”. Linguistics and Education 24 (1): 8–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maton, Karl; Hood, Susan; and Shay, Suellen (eds). 2013. Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Qianhua. 2018. “Assessing meaning dimension quality in consecutive interpreting”. Perspectives 26 (2): 196–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz. 2015. “Evolution of interpreting research”. In The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, ed. by Mikkelson, Holly; and Renée Jourdenais, 62–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2016. Introducing Interpreting Studies, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachtleben, Annette; and Ineke Crezee. 2015. “Digital innovation serving interpreter education in New Zealand”. In Interpreter Education in the Digital Age: Innovation, Access and Change, ed. by Ehrlich, Suzanne; and Jamina Napier, 18–38. Washington (WA): Gallaudet UP.Google Scholar
Sawyer, David B. 2004. Fundamental aspects of interpreter education: Curriculum and Assessment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schjoldager, Anne. 1995/2002. “An Exploratory Study of Translational Norms in Simultaneous Interpreting: Methodological Reflections”. In The Interpreting Studies Reader, ed. by Pöchhacker, Franz; and Miriam Shlesinger, 301–311. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, Danica; and Marianne, Lederer (Transl. by Yan, S. W.; and Shao, W.). 2011. Pédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation. Beijing: China Translation and Publishing House.Google Scholar
Setton, Robin. 2010. “From practice to theory and back in interpreting: the pivotal role of training”. The interpreters’ Newsletter 151: 1–18.Google Scholar
Setton, Robin; and Andrew Dawrant. 2016. Conference interpreting: A complete course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Weihe. 2019. “Translation education in four decades of reform and opening up: achievements, challenges and development”. Chinese Translators Journal 40 (1): 68–75.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wang, Weiwei
2021. Introducing China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE)—Interpreting Competence Scales. In Testing and Assessment of Interpreting [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.