Article published in:
APTIF 9 - Reality vs. Illusion: From Morse code to machine translation
Edited by Frans De Laet, In-kyoung Ahn and Joong-chol Kwak
[Babel 66:4/5] 2020
► pp. 750–764

New interpretation and techniques of transcreation

| Xi’an Beilin Haidai Translation Center
This article points out some “loopholes” in the traditional Chinese-English translation theories, and proposes several transcreation theories to countermeasure the “loopholes”, illustrating non-equivalences. In particular, the article proposes a novel translation/transcreation theory that incorporates the writing field, in both the source and target languages, into the traditional translation field. This is for the purpose of cultural transmission and integration. In addition, the article illustrates the relationship between translation and writing by dissecting the translation/transcreation process into two processes: understanding and writing. Moreover, it suggests that the transcreation field develop some criteria, such as: fidelity, flexibility and creativity, and that all the science, social science and humanities subareas in the transcreation field are categorized according to these criteria. In order to support the transcreation theories and multidisciplinary translation theories proposed in this article, some typical examples and transcreation techniques that push the envelope of existing transcreation theories are provided. This article may shed new light on the limitations of, and possible solutions to, machine translation. It may also answer questions like: “Is understanding unimportant to machine translation?”
Keywords: transcreation, trans-writing, multidisciplinary translation theories, research-based transcreation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A new interpretation of the translation/transcreation process
  • 3.Transcreation examples
    • 3.1Correction methods
      • 3.1.1Example of English-to-Chinese transcreation
      • 3.1.2Example of Chinese-to-English transcreation
    • 3.2Coinage methods
      • 3.2.1Example of English-to-Chinese transcreation
      • 3.2.2Example of Chinese-to-English transcreation
    • 3.3Supplementary methods
      • 3.3.1Example of English-to-Chinese transcreation
      • 3.3.2Example of Chinese-to-English transcreation
    • 3.4Derivative methods
      • 3.4.1Example of English-to-Chinese transcreation
      • 3.4.2Example of Chinese-to-English transcreation
    • 3.5Trans-writing
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 17 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00178.che
References
Baker, Mona
2018 In other words: A coursebook on translation, 3rd edition. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benetello, Claudia
2018 “When translation is not enough: Transcreation as a convention-defying practice. A practitioner’s perspective”. The Journal of Specialised Translation 291: 28–43.Google Scholar
Polak, Elliot; and Cuttita, Frank
2006 “Global marketing disasters and recoveries”. Admap 4701: 36–38.Google Scholar
Raymond, Jane E.; Fenske, Mark J.; and Tavassoli, Nader T.
2003 “Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli”. Psychological Science 141: 537–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spinzi, Cinzia; Rizzo, Alessandra; and Zummo, Marianna Lya
2018 Translation or transcreation? discourses, texts and visuals. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar