Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 67:5 (2021) ► pp.533–552

The axis of professionalization

Translators’ and interpreters’ market behaviour and its factors in Slovakia

| Matej Bel University
| Comenius University

Using the results of two surveys conducted by the present authors, this paper examines translators’ and interpreters’ behaviour in the translation market and factors that influence it in (Slovak) society. In keeping with the familiar fact that not all translators are alike, we believe that empirically measurable factors enable us to observe behavioural patterns among translators and interpreters that are distinguishable along an axis of specialisation and an axis of professionalisation. The authors conducted two separate surveys involving 550 translators and interpreters – including literary translators, court translators and interpreters, translators of technical texts, audiovisual translators, institutional interpreters, and freelance translators – who worked across Slovakia’s market spectrum. In the analysis of the survey results, we found that, among other things, the level of professionalisation played a crucial role in translators’ decision-making processes within the broader social and professional context. In line with Toury’s (1995, 55) definitions of the norm, we hoped to “distinguish regularity of behaviour in recurrent situations of the same type” according to certain factors, including the degree of professionalisation and age, education, and type of translatorial activity.

Keywords: professionalisation, specialisation, behavioural patterns, translation sociology, decision-making process
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.The study: Methods
    • 3.1The questionnaire instrument
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Education and specialisation
    • 4.2The legal form of business
    • 4.3Technical competences
    • 4.4Responses to market signals
    • 4.5Rates
    • 4.6The overall share in the market
  • 5.A summary of findings
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00237.djo
References
Chesterman, Andrew
2009 “The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes 421: 13–22.Google Scholar
Djovčoš, Martin
2014 “Translators and Social Context: The Case Study of Slovakia.” Meta 59 (2): 330–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djovčoš, Martin, and Pavol Šveda
2017 Mýty a fakty o preklade a tlmočení na Slovensku [Myths and facts about translation and interpreting in Slovakia]. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Djovčoš, Martin, and Igor Tyšš
2018 “Levý a sociológia prekladu? Inšpirácie a paralely – náčrt problematiky” [Levý and translation sociology?: Inspirations and parallels – a sketch of the research field]. AUC Philologica 21: 43–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentile, Paola
2016 “The Interpreter’s Professional Status: A Sociological Investigation into the Interpreting Profession.” Ph.D. diss., Università degli Studi di Trieste.
Katan, David
2009 “Translation Theory and Professional Practice: A Global Survey of the Great Divide,” in “Translation Studies: Focus on the Translator,” thematic section, Hermes Translation Studies: Focus on the Translator 421: 111–153.Google Scholar
Levý, Jiří
1967 “Translation as a Decision Process.” In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, vol. 31, 1171–1182. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony, et al.
2012 The Status of the Translation Profession in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. [URL]
Ruokonen, Minna, Leena Salmi, and Elin Svahn
eds. 2018 “The Translation Profession, Translator Status and Identity,” thematic section, Hermes 581.Google Scholar
Simeoni, Daniel
1998 “The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus.” Target 10 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svoboda, Tomáš
2015 Průzkum překladatelského trhu ve střední Evropě – souhrnná zpráva [Survey on translation market in central Europe: A comprehensive report]. [URL]
Toury, Gideon
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Joseph
1992 “Interpreting as an Emerging Profession in Taiwan: A Sociological Model.” Masters diss., Fu Jen Catholic University, Taiwan.
Yılmaz Gümüş, Volga
2018 “Solidity and Professionalization of Translation: Turkey as a Case in Point.” Hermes 58: 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CBTI-BKVT – Translation and Interpreting in Belgium: Market Survey Report
2018 [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Melicherčíková, Miroslava & Soňa Hodáková
2023. Prieniky a odlišnosti v kognitívno-osobnostnom profile a tlmočníckom výkone profesionálov a študentov, DOI logo
Sulaiman, M. Zain, Haslina Haroon, Intan Safinaz Zainudin & Muhamad Jad Hamizan bin Mohamad Yusoff
2022. The professionalisation of translation practice: a systematic review of the literature. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Šveda, Pavol & Martin Djovčoš
2022. Translation and interpretation in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. STRIDON: Studies in Translation and Interpreting 2:2 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.