Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 68:6 (2022) ► pp.839–859

Translating (or not) a South American Philosopher

The paratexts of the works of José Enrique Rodó in English

| The University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyBrownsville, Texas
This study will consider translation as a tool to transfer ideas from Latin America to North America (and the rest of the English-speaking world). It will do so by exploring some of the paratextual strategies that have been employed in transmitting the ideas of Latin American philosophers to the English-speaking world. Specifically, it will rely on a case study, namely, the translation into English of the works of José Enrique Rodó, an important South American philosopher from the early twentieth century. The paper will outline Rodó’s work as translated into English, focusing not on the quality of the translated texts themselves but rather on what the translations were expected to do. As a way to understand their expected functions, the present study will describe the paratextual apparatuses that surround the translations. Such an analysis will rely on Gérard Genette’s work on paratexts to draw conclusions regarding the role of translation in the flow of ideas from the Global South to the Global North.
Keywords: José Enrique Rodó, Latin American Philosophy, translation, paratexts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Paratexts defined
    • 3.2Translations of Ariel
    • 3.3Translation of Motivos de Proteo
    • 3.4Nontranslations of Rodó’s work
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00293.gon
References (34)
References
Bastin, Georges L. 2010. “Traduction et histoire. Les indispensables paratextes” [Translation and history: Indispensable paratexts]. In Enfoques de teoría, traducción y didáctica de la lengua francesa. Estudios dedicados a la profesora Brigitte Lépinette [Approaches to French-language theory, translation, and teaching. Studies in honor of Professor Brigitte Lépinette], edited by Juan Carlos de Miguel y Canuto, Carlos Hernández Sacristán, and Julia Pinilla, 47–59. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Batchelor, Kathryn. 2018. Translation and Paratexts. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frondizi, Risieri. 2004. “Is There an Ibero-American Philosophy?” In Latin American Philosophy: An Introduction with Readings, edited by Susana Nuccetelli and Gary Seay, 394–301. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Carlos. 1988. “Prologue” to Ariel, by José Enrique Rodó, 13–18. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, translated by Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Núñez, Gabriel. 2018. “Traducciones para y por los españoles americanos: el papel de los traductores en la independencia de Hispanoamericana” [Translations for and by Spanish Americans: The role of translators in Spanish America’s independence]. Humanidades [Humanities] 2018 (3): 69–100.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Translating to Change the Nation: The Case of José Pedro Varela, a Reformer in Late 19th Century Uruguay.” Translation and Interpreting 11 (2): 119–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gracia, Jorge. 2003. “Can Hispanic Philosophy Flourish in the USA?” In Latin American Philosophy: An Introduction with Readings, edited by Susana Nuccetelli, and Gary Seay, 302–307. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jones, Willis K., ed. 1963. Spanish-American Literature in Translation: A Selection of Poetry, Fiction, and Drama since 1888. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing.Google Scholar
Krauze, Enrique. 2011. Redentores: ideas y poder en América Latina [Redeemers: Ideas and power in Latin America]. Mexico City: Random House Mondadori.Google Scholar
Lange, Duncan. 2021. “The Translation of Philosophical Texts.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Philosophy, edited by J. Piers Rawling and Philip Wilson, 307–327. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
Large, Duncan. 2022. “Translation and Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Translation, edited by Kirsten Malmkjær, 258–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nin Frías, Alberto. 1928. “Introduction” to Ariel by José Enrique Rodó, v–xxii. Chicago, New York, and Boston: Benjamin H. Sanborn.Google Scholar
Nuccetelli, Susana, and Gary Seay. 2004. Latin American Philosophy: An Introduction with Readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nuccetelli, Susana. 2020. An Introduction to Latin American Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Carlos. 2018. Pensadores uruguayos [Uruguayan thinkers]. Montevideo: Ediciones B.Google Scholar
Peden, Margaret S. 1988. “Annotated Bibliography” in Ariel by José Enrique Rodó, 115–149. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Petit, Víctor. 1937. Rodó, su vida. su obra. Segunda edición ampliada. [Rodó, his life, his work. Second expanded edition.] Montevideo: Imprenta Latina.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2021. Homenaje a José Enrique Rodó [In Honor of José Enrique Rodó]. 4 October. Live stream, 1:17:45. [URL]
Rée, Jonathan. 2001. “The Translation of Philosophy.” New Literary History 32 (2): 223–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, William F. 1929. “Preface” in Ariel by José Enrique Rodó, vii–ix1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rodó, José Enrique. 1967. Ariel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Monegal, Emir. 1967. “Introduction” to Obras completas [Complete works], by José Enrique Rodó, 9–139. Madrid: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Ronen, Shahar, Bruno Gonçalves, Kevin Z. Hu, Alessandro Vespignani, Steven Pinker, and César A. Hidalgo. 2014. “Links that Speak: The Global Language Network and Its Association with Global Fame.” Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the US 111 (52): E5616–E5622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Román, Gustavo. 2001. “Introduction.” In This America We Dream of: Rodó and Ariel One Hundred Years On, edited by Gustavo San Román, Gustavo, 1–7. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
. 2018. A Companion to José Enrique Rodó. Suffolk: Tamesis.Google Scholar
Silvert, Kalman H. 1958. Welcome to the Fold, Mr. Nixon, or, Ariel and the Dilemma of the Intellectuals: A Letter from KH Silvert. New York City: American Universities Field Staff.Google Scholar
Stehn, Alex. 2014. “Latin American Philosophy.” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [URL]
Steiner, George. 1998. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation, 3rd. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, F. J. 1922. “Prefatory Essay” in Ariel by José Enrique Rodó, v–xxii1. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Symington, James W. 1988. Foreword in Ariel by José Enrique Rodó, 7–11. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tahir Gürçağlar, Şehnaz. 2002. “What Texts Don’t Tell: The Use of Paratexts in Translation Research.” In Crosscultural Transgressions. Research Models in Translation Studies II: Historical and Ideological Issues, edited by Theo Hermans, 44–60. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Young, Robert J. C. 2014. “Philosophy in Translation.” In A Companion to Translation Studies, edited by Sandra Bermann, and Catherine Porter, 41–53. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2000. “Translating Culture: Reading the Paratexts to Aimé Césaire’s Cahier d’un retour au pays natal .” TTR : Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction 13 (2): 29–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar