Article published In:
Babel: Online-First Articles

The retranslator as the propagandist of MOI

The discursive contexts of the (re-)translation of Rumi’s Divan-e-Shams in the United States

| Sheikhbahaee University
Translations are reflections of their historical, social, cultural, and political contexts. Given this, the current study aimed to explore the ways Nicholson (1898) and Arberry (1967) dealt with translating culture-bound terms and Quranic allusions in the translations of Rumi’s mystical poems in Divan-e-Shams-e- Tabrizi into English and then identify the textual relationships between the two. To do so, the comparative model of research and the notion of tertium comparationis was used. The strategies used by (re)translators for translating culture-bound terms and Quranic allusions were first identified and categorized in a selection of twenty poems from Divan-e-Shams-e- Tabrizi. The study’s findings showed strong filial relationships between the two versions, where both had used cultural adaptation and explicitation of cultural-bound terms by using the addition strategy used in their endnotes. However, the dissidence lay in the content of the endnotes, and the way discursive contexts of the (re)translators shaped their translation strategies was discussed.
Keywords: culture-specific terms, dissidence, filiation, intertextuality, Quranic allusions (re)translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Procedure
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Analysis of culture-bound terms
    • 4.2Analysis of (re) translation of Quranic allusions
    • 4.3Qualitative analysis of the content of Nicholson’s endnotes
    • 4.6Qualitative analysis of the content of Arberry’s endnotes
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00390.afz
References (37)
References
Abrams, Meyer Howard, and Geoffrey Harpham. 2015. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Ali, Rozina. 2017. “The Erasure of Islam from the Poetry of Rumi.” The New Yorker, 5 January.Google Scholar
Alvstad, Cecilia, and Rosa Alexandra Assis. 2015. “Voice in Retranslation.” Target 27 (1): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appiah, Kwane Anthony. 1993. “Thick Translation.” Callaloo 16 (4): 808–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arberry, Arthur John. 1953. The Holy Koran: An Introduction with Selections (Ethical and Religious Classics of East and West). London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Arberry, John Arthur. 1960. Oriental Essays: Portraits of Seven Scholars. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Arthur John, Arberry. 1967. Mystical Poems of Rumi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arberry, Arthur John. 2009. Mystical Poems of Rumi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Azadibougar, Omid, and Simon Patton. 2015. “Coleman Barks’ Versions of Rumi in the USA.” Translation and Literature 24 (2): 172–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogucki, Lukasz. 2013. Areas and Methods of Audiovisual Translation Research. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Siobhan. 2006. “Narrative Theory and Retranslation Theory.” Across Languages and Cultures 7 (2): 145–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadera, Susanne, and Andrew Samuel Walsh. 2017. Literary Translation in Context. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cummings, Bruce. 1997. “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies During and After the Cold War.” Critical Asian Studies 29 (1): 6–26.Google Scholar
Foroozanfar, Badi‘o’zaman. 1957. Collected Poems of Badi‘o’zaman Foroozanfar. Vizarati Farhang va Ershade Eslami. Tehran: Iran.Google Scholar
Davies, Hadland. 1907. The Persian Mystics. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Deane-Cox, Sharon. 2014. Retranslation: Translation, Literature and Reinterpretation. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gerard. 1982. Palimpsestes: La Littérature au Second Degré. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Gürçağlar, Şhehnaz Tahir. 2011. “Gulliver Travels in Turkey: Retranslation and Intertextuality.” In Crossing Textual Boundaries in International Children’s Literature, edited by Lance Weldy, 44–58. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Khalifa, Abdel-Wahab. 2020. “The Hidden Violence of Retranslation: Mahfouz’s Awlad Haratina in English.” The Translator 26 (2): 145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, Kaisa, and Outi Paloposki. 2015. “Anxieties of Influence.” Target 27 (1): 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Martin. 2001. Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America. Washington: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1990. Contrasting Languages: The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahouti, Hassan. 2011. “Mawlana Rumi Review.” Ketab-e Mah-e Adabiyat 59 (2): 56–61.Google Scholar
Leppihalme, Ritva. 1997. Culture Bumps: An Empirical Approach to the Translation of Allusions. Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Franklin. 2008. Rumi: Past and Present, East and West: The Life, Teaching and Poetry of Jalâl Al-Din Rumi. Oxford: One World Publication.Google Scholar
McQuillan, Martin. 2000. The Narrative Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nedergaard-Larsen, Birgit. 1993. “Culture-bound Problems in Subtitling.” Perspectives 1 (2): 207–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Reynolds, A. 1898. Selected Poems from the Divani Shamsi Tabriz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 1998. Method in Translation History. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Simidchieva, Marta. 2010. “Mawlana Jalal al-Din Rumi of R. A. Nicholson.” Mawlana Rumi Review 1 (1): 33–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina, and Myriam Suchet. 2013. “Voice in the Field of Translation Studies/De questionnement en questionnement.” In Intertextual Voices in Translation, vol. 11, edited by Kristiina Taivalkoski-Shilov and Myriam Suchet, 1–31. Les Éditions québécoises de l’oeuvre.Google Scholar
Valdeón, Roberto A. 2014. “The 1992 English Retranslation of Brevísima Relación de la Destrucción de las Indias.” Translation Studies 7 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkin, Richard Owen. 2021. “Arthur John Arberry: A Critical Evaluation of an Orientalist.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wales Trinity Saint David.
Williams, Jenny, and Andrew Chesterman. 2002. The Map: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Zhang, Huanyao, and Huijuan Ma. 2018. “Intertextuality in Retranslation.” Perspectives 26 (4): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar