Article published In:
BabelVol. 61:3 (2015) ► pp.361–380
Translation theory
Myths, prejudices and realities
Translation Studies is an academic discipline that has managed to establish itself as such thanks to the research and theoretical reflection on its main object of study, i.e. translation. Yet, given the applied nature of this field, there is some disagreement as to whether translation theory is relevant in the practice of translation. The never-ending battle between these two dimensions of the discipline has given rise to a series of myths and prejudices concerning Translation Studies that extend into both the sphere of translation as a profession and the academic context. Although a number of authors have highlighted the contributions that translation theory has to offer in the training of translators (Gile 1995, 2010; Chesterman and Wagner 2002; Munday 2012), Translation theory usually plays a secondary role in the curricula of Spanish universities. At the same time, students’ attitude towards the more theoretical subjects seems to be one of rejection. Here we conduct an empirical study to analyse the preconceptions that Translation and Interpreting (T&I) undergraduate and post-graduate students have concerning the usefulness and benefits of translation theory in their training.
References
Agost, Rosa
2008 “Enseñar la teoría de la traducción: diseño de competencias y explotación de recursos pedagógicos.” Quaderns. Revista de Traducció 151: 137–152.
Baker, Mona
1992 In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge. 
1996 “Professing Translation.” ESSE 5 (1): 42–44.
Bartrina, Francesca
2005 “Theory and Translator Training”. In Training for the New Millenium, ed. by Martha Tennent, 177–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bernardini, Silvia
2004 “The Theory behind the Practice. Translator Training or Translator Education?” In Translation in Undergraduate Degree Programmes, ed. by Kirsten Malmkjær, 17–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boase-Beier, Jean
2010 “Who Needs Theory?” In Translation: Theory and Practice in Dialogue, ed. by Antoinette Fawcett, Karla L. Guadarrama Garcia, and Rebecca Hyde Parker, 25–37. London/New York: Continuum.
Calzada, María
2007 El espejo traductológico. Teorías y didácticas para la formación del traductor. Madrid: Octaedro.
Chesterman, Andrew, and Emma Wagner
2002 Can Theory Help Translators? A Dialogue between the Ivory Tower and the Wordface. Manchester (UK): St. Jerome Publishing.
Delisle, Jean
1981 L’Enseignement de l’interprétation et de la traduction. Ottawa: Éditions de l’université d’Ottawa.
Franco Aixelá
Javier 2012 “La teoría os hará libres.” Vasos comunicantes: revista de ACE traductores 431: 31–48.
Gile, Daniel
2010 “Why Translation Studies Matters: A Pragmatist’s Viewpoint”. In Why Translation Studies MattersWhy Translation Studies Matters, ed. by Daniel Gile, Gyde Hansen, and Nike K. Pokorn, 251–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gile, Daniel, Gyde Hansen, and Nike K. Pokorn
Ingo, Rune
1992 “Translation Theory: Four Fundamental Aspects”. In Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience, ed. by Cay Dollerup and Annette Loddegaard, 49–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kamenická, Renata
2011 “Teaching Translation Theory: The Challenges of Theory Framing”. In Theories and Practice: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on English and American Studies, ed. by Roman Trušník, Katarína Nemčoková, and Gregory Jason Bell, 127–136. Zlín: Tomas Bata University.
Leal, Alice
2011 Is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full? Reflections on Translation Theory and Practice in Brazil. Doctoral thesis, Wien.
Li, Defeng
2003 “Translator Training: What Translation Students Have to Say.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Translators’ Journal 47 (4): 513–531.
2007 “Translation Curriculum and Pedagogy. Views of Administrators of Translation Services.” Target 19 (1): 105–133.
Munday, Jeremy
2012 Introducing Translation Studies. Theories and Applications. New York: Routledge (2001, 3rd edition).
Neubert, Albert
1989 “Translation as Mediation”. In Babel. The Cultural and Linguistic Barriers between Nations, ed. by Rayner Komel and Jerry Payne, 5–12. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Ordóñez López
Pilar 2011 “De mayor quiero ser traductor II. Estudio de la visión del alumnado sobre el perfil socio-profesional del traductor actual.” Intralinea 131: 1–21.
Presas, Marisa, and Celia Martín de León
2011 “Teorías implícitas de traductores principiantes. Una investigación cualitativa en traductología cognitiva.” Sendebar 221: 87–111.
Pym, Anthony
2010 Exploring Translation Theories. London/New York: Routledge.
Shuttleworth, Mark
2001 “The Role of Theory in Translator Training: Some Observations about Syllabus Design.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Translators’ Journal 46 (3): 497–506.
Ulrych, Margherita
2005 “Training Translators. Programmes, Curricula, Practices”. In Training for the New Millenium, ed. by Martha Tennent, 3–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Valcárcel, Amelia
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Agost, Rosa & Pilar Ordóñez-López
2021. La traductologie comme espace d’interaction : vieux préjugés, nouveaux défis. Meta: Journal des traducteurs 66:3 ► pp. 512 ff. 
Ordóñez López, Pilar & Rosa Agost
2022. Future translatorsʼ views on translation theory: a qualitative approach. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 16:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
Yang, Yuan & Xiangdong Li
2022. Which theories are taught to students and how they are taught: A content analysis of interpreting textbooks . Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 92 ► pp. 167 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.