Cover not available
Article published In:
Babel
Vol. 62:3 (2016) ► pp.495–515

Translatorial dual-processing–evidence from interlingual trainee subtitling

Drawing on cognitive linguistics and psychology, this paper attempts to model the subtitler’s decision-making as involving two types of operations. They are referred to as System 1 and System 2, the former being fast, automatic and requiring little effort, and the latter being slower, controlled and effortful. To test the dual-processing hypothesis, I analyse trainee subtitlers’ renditions with a focus on the construction “you + to like + me” which exemplifies a cross-language asymmetry and a potential (disguised) translation challenge. Remarkably, the English construction is employed equally-conventionally to represent the concept of being favourably disposed to somebody in a non-physical/sexual manner, on the one hand, and being attracted to somebody, on the other. In Polish, however, the “prototypes” will typically be represented as distinct expressions. The present findings suggest that because differentiating between the prototypes and coding them linguistically is not challenging to the participants, it is the automation of their judgment that leads them to settle for flawed target variants (Stage 1). Additional evidence is obtained (Stage 2) as participants are induced to go from System 1 to System 2 thinking–a cross-stage comparison indicates that the fast-to-slow switch reorients the trainees’ subtitling choices and ultimately improves translation quality.

Keywords: interlingual subtitling, decision-making, cognition, translator training, translation quality
Published online: 29 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.62.3.07dec
References
Bogucki, Łukasz
2013 Areas and Methods of Audiovisual Translation Research. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2001 “Does Language Shape Thought? English and Mandarin Speakers’ Conceptions of Time”. Cognitive Psychology 43 (1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brédart, Serge, and Karin Modolo
1988 “Moses Strikes Again: Focalization Effect on a Semantic Illusion”. Acta Psychologica 671: 135–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brédart, Serge, and Marcel Docquier
1989 “The Moses Illusion: A Follow-up on the Focalization Effect”. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 91: 357–362.Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2008 “Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought”. Language Learning 58 (1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cubelli, Roberto, Daniela Paolieri, Lorella Lotto, and Job Remo
2011 “The Effect of Grammatical Gender on Object Categorization”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37 (2): 449–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deckert, Mikołaj
2015 “The Automated Interlingual Mapping Effect in Trainee Subtitlers”. Journal of Specialised Translation (JoSTrans) 241: 28–43.Google Scholar
Díaz Cintas, Jorge
1998 “La labor subtituladora en tanto que instancia de traducción subordinada”. In Actes del III Congrés Internacional sobre Traducció, ed. by Pilar Orero, 83–89. Bellaterra: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autónoma.Google Scholar
Epstein, Seymour
1994 “Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious”. American Psychologist 491: 709–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Cognitive-experiential Self-theory of Personality”. In Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, Volume 5: Personality and Social Psychology, ed. by Theodore Millon and Melvin J. Lerner, 159–184. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Thomas D., and Mark E. Mattson
1981 “From Words to Meaning: A Semantic Illusion”. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 201: 540–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T
1984 “Heuristic and Analytic Processes in Reasoning”. British Journal of Psychology 751: 451–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Deciding Before you Think: Relevance and Reasoning in the Selection Task”. British Journal of Psychology 871: 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Thinking Twice: Two Minds in One Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T., and David E. Over
1996 Rationality and reasoning. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T., and Keith E. Stanovich
2013 “Dual-process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 81: 223–241 and 263–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Caleb
2013 Linguistic Relativity: Evidence across Languages and Cognitive Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, Caitlin M., Bria Long, Aya Inamori, and Lera Boroditsky
2010 “Constructing Agency: The Role of Language.” Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, Caitlin M., and Lera Boroditsky
2010 “Subtle Linguistic Cues Influence Perceived Blame and Financial Liability”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17 (5): 644–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Who Dunnit? Cross-linguistic Differences in Eye-witness Memory”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18 (1): 150–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fausey, Caitling M., and Teenie Matlock
2011 “Can Grammar Win Elections?” Political Psychology 32 (4): 563–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007 “Language as a Witness: Insights from Cognitive Linguistics”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14 (2): 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frankish, Keith, and Jonathan St. B.T. Evans
2009 “The Duality of Mind: An Historical Perspective”. In In two minds: Dual processes and beyond, ed. by Keith Frankish and Jonathan St. B.T. Evans, 1–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1975 “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning”. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 123–131.
Frederick, Shane
2005 “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 25–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gajek, Elżbieta
2008 “Edukacyjne znaczenie napisów w tekście audiowizualnym”. Przekładaniec: o przekładzie audiowizualnym 201: 106–114.Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm
[2005] 2006 Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hannon, Brenda, and Meredyth Daneman
2001 “Susceptibility to Semantic Illusions: An Individual-differences Perspective”. Memory & Cognition 29 (3): 449–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel
[2011] 2012 Thinking, Fast and Slow. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Dale T. Miller
1986 “Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to its Alternatives”. Psychological Review 93 (2): 136–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamas, Eleen N., and Lynne M. Reder
1995 “The Role of Familiarity in Cognitive Processing”. In Sources of Coherence in Reading, ed. by Robert Frederick Lorch and Edward J. O’Brien, 177–202. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kamas, Eleen N., Lynne M. Reder, and Michael S. Ayers
1996 “Partial Matching in the Moses Illusion: Response Bias not Sensitivity”. Memory & Cognition 241: 687–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Gary
1999 Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua
2005 “Theory of Mind and Moral Cognition: Exploring the Connections”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 91: 357–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krejtz, Izabela, Agnieszka Szarkowska, and Krzysztof Krejtz
2013 “Effects of Shot Changes on Eye Movements in Subtitling”. Journal of Eye Movement Research 6 (5): 3, 1–12.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1995 “Interactional Biases in Human Thinking”. In Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
1987 Conceptual Analysis, Linguistic Meaning, and Verbal Interaction. Łódź: Łódź University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenzo García, Lourdes, and Ana María Pereira Rodríguez
(eds) 2000 Traducción subordinada: El doblaje (inglés-espańol/galego). Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións Universidade de Vigo.Google Scholar
Mayoral, Roberto, Dorothy Kelly, and Natividad Gallardo
1988 “The Concept of Constrained Translation. Non-Linguistic Perspectives on Translation”. Meta 33 (3): 356–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayoral, Roberto
1993 “La traducción cinematográfica: el subtitulado”. Sendebar 41: 45–68.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, Herre von, and Ineke Kok
1990 “Failing to Notice Errors in Sentences”. Language & Cognitive Processes 51: 105–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orero, Pilar
2004 “Audiovisual Translation: A New Dynamic Umbrella”. In Topics in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Pilar Orero, VII–XIII. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Michael I., and Charles R.R. Snyder
1975 “Attention and Cognitive Control”. In Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium, ed. by Roberto L. Solso, 55–85. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rabadán Álvarez, Rosa
1991 Equivalencia y Traducción: Problemática de la Equivalencia Translémica Inglés-Espańol. León: Universidad de León, Secretariado de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry, and Paul Kay
2009 “Language, Thought, and Color: Whorf was Half Right”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 131: 439–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1975 “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3): 192–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor, and Carolyn B. Mervis
1975 “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories”. Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1977 “Human Categorization”. In Studies in Cross-cultural Psychology I, ed. by Neil Warren, 1–49. London: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 “Principles of Categorization”. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Richard, M., and Walter Schneider
1977 “Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: II. Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending, and a General Theory”. Psychological Review 84 (2): 127–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloman, Steven A
1996 “The Empirical Case for Two Systems of Reasoning”. Psychological Bulletin 1191: 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E
2011 Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E., and Richard F. West
2000 “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 231: 645–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, Edward
1996 Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky
2011 “Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning”. PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning”. PLoS ONE 8 (1): e52961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titford, Christopher
1992 “Sub-titling: Constrained Translation”. Lebende Sprachen 37 (3): 113–166.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet
[1958] 1995 Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation, transl. and ed. by Juan C. Sager and Marie-Josée Hamel. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical Investigations, transl. by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
“About Time”
2013, written and directed by Richard Curtis.Google Scholar
“The Wolf of Wall Street”
2013, written by Terence Winter (screenplay)/Jordan Belfort (book), directed by Martin Scorsese.Google Scholar
Szymborska, Wisława
1993 “Some People Like Poetry”, transl. by Walter Whipple.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Deckert, Mikołaj
2017. Translation and Cognition: Cases of Asymmetry. An Editorial. Research in Language 15:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Deckert, Mikołaj
2017. Asymmetry and automaticity in translation. Translation and Interpreting Studies 12:3 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Deckert, Mikołaj
2020. Decision-Making: Putting AVT and MA into Perspective. In The Palgrave Handbook of Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility [Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, ], ► pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Zhiwei & Zhuojia Chen
2021. A systematic review of experimental research in audiovisual translation 1992–2020. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 4:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.