Part of
Skyping the Family: Interpersonal video communication and domestic life
Edited by Richard Harper, Rod Watson and Christian Licoppe
[Benjamins Current Topics 103] 2019
► pp. 1949
Adato, A.
1980 “Occasionality as a Constituent Feature of the Known-in-common Character of Topics.” Human Studies 3: 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, K., and A. Cekaite
2011 “Activity Contracts and Directives in Everyday Family Politics.” Discourse and Society 22 (2): 137–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.
1963 “Action, Reasons, and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700, repr. in Action & Events, 1980: 3–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A., and C. Goodwin
1992 “Editors’ Introduction.” Rethinking Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elias, N.
1969 (or 1939)The Civilizing Process. Vol. I. The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R., and W. Housley
2015Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., M. Lynch, and E. Livingston
1981 “The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically-Delivered Pulsar.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 11: 131–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., and H. Sacks
1970 “On Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” In Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, ed. by J. C. McKinney, and E. A. Tiryakian, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Goldman, A.
2006Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mind Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
1981Conversational Organization, Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R.
1972Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Harper, R.
2010Texture: Human Expression in the Age of Communications Overload. Cambridge, MA: MIT. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harper, R., D. Randall, and W. Sharrock
2016Choice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Harper, R., D. R. Watson, and J. Woelfer
This issue. “The Skype Paradox: Homelessness and Selective Intimacy in the Use of Communications Technology.” In Special Issue of Pragmatics, Interpersonal video communication as a site of human sociality ed. by Harper et al. Pragmatics 27 3 Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Ingold, T.
2011Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hume, D.
[1739–40] 1974A Treatise on Human Nature, 2nd Edition, ed. P. Niddich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laugier, S.
2000Why We Need Ordinary Language Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leist, A.
(ed.) 2007Action in Context. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.
1993Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madianou, M., and D. Miller
2012Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W.
1988 “Language, Interaction, and Social Problems.” Social Problems 35: 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., and J. Sininan
2014Webcam. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z.
(ed.) 2011A Networked Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rintel, S., R. Harper, and K. O’Hara
2016 “The Tyranny of the Everyday in Mobile Video Messaging.” Proceedings of CH’16. San Jose: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
1972 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by D. Sudnow, 31–74. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1974 “On the Analysability of Stories by Children.” In Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by R. Turner, 216–232. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1992Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I & II. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., and E. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
Sandis, C.
2012The Things We Do and Why We Do Them. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.
1963 “Proper Names.” In Philosophy and Ordinary Language, ed. by C. E. Caton, 154–161. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, W. W., and D. R. Watson
1984 “What’s the Point of “Rescuing Motives”?British Journal of Sociology, 35 (3): 435–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. D.
2013Foundations for Moral Relativism. Cambridge: Open Book. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. R.
1981 “Conversational and Organisational Uses of Proper Names: An Aspect of Counsellor-Client Interaction.” In Medical Work: Realities and Routines, ed. by P. Atkinson, and C. Heath, 91–108. Farnborough: Gower.Google Scholar
2005 “The Visibility Arrangements of Public Space: Conceptual Resources and Methodological Issues in Analysing Pedestrian Movements.” In Communication and Cognition, Special Issue, ed. by M. Ball, 38 (3/4): 201–229.Google Scholar
2014 “Trust in Interpersonal Interaction and Cloud Computing.” In Trust, Computing and Society, ed. by R. H. R. Harper, 172–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953Philosophical Investigations, 4th Ed. trans G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and J. Schulte, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1964The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar