Cover not available
Part of
Skyping the Family: Interpersonal video communication and domestic life
Edited by Richard Harper, Rod Watson and Christian Licoppe
[Benjamins Current Topics 103] 2019
► pp. 51–86

Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’

The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings

| Telecom ParisTech, Paris
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Analysis
    • 2.1Pre-beginnings and the collaborative assemblage of a social scene for video-mediated encounters
    • 2.2Multiple greetings
    • 2.3Analyzing various actual instances of multiple greetings in the opening of Skype conversations
    • 2.4Multiple greetings and the embedding of video-mediated communication in larger communicative ecologies
    • 2.5Not only appearing, but appearing in a certain way
    • 2.6A subtly orchestrated choreography of multimodal appearances and greetings
    • 2.7‘This is not to be seen as the beginning’: Designing visual appearances and greetings so as to neutralize some of their sequential implications
    • 2.8A sequentially frustrating succession of finely coordinated appearances and withdrawals
    • 2.9Actually beginning the video conversation: A third greeting sequence
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.103.03lic
References (25)
References
Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gersheim. 2014. Distant Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, J., G. Venolia, and J. Tang. 2012. “Focusing on Shared Experiences: Moving Beyond the Camera in Video Communication.” Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (June 11–15, Newcastle, UK), 96–105. New York: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Button, G., and W. Sharrock. 1998. “The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work.”. Social Studies of Science 28: 73–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fornel, M. 1994. “Le cadre interactionnel de l’échange visiophonique.” Réseaux 64: 07–132.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1997. “Universal and Culture-Specific Properties of Greetings.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7 (1): 63–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2011. “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by L. Mondada, J. Steenswig, and T. Stivers, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focussed Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, D. S., A. Sellen, and X. Cao. 2010. “Home Video Communication: Mediating ‘Closeness’.” Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, C., and J. Morel. 2012. “Video-in-Interaction: “Talking Heads” and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research in Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 399–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madianou, M., and D. Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. 2010. “Eröffnung und Vor-Eröffnung in technisch vermittelter interaktion: Videokonferenzen.” In Situationeröffnungen: Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by L. Mondada, and R. Schmitt, 277–334. Narr: Tubingen.Google Scholar
Mortensen, K., and S. Hazel. 2014. “Moving into Interaction. Social Practices for Initiating Encounters at a Help Desk.” Journal of Pragmatics 62: 46–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neustaedter, C., and S. Greenberg. 2011. “Intimacy in Long Distance Relationships over Video Chat.” Proceedings of CHI 2012. ACM Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred / Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 57–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Relieu, M. 2007. “La téléprésence, ou l’autre visiophonie.” Réseaux 144: 183–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. 1972. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by D. Hymes, and J. Gumperz, 346–380. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1998. “Body Torque.” Conversation 65(3):535–596.Google Scholar
1986. “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies 9: 111–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunakawa, C. 2012. “Japanese Family via Webcam: An Ethnographic Study of Cross-Spatial Interactions”. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 7258, ed. by M. Okumura, D. Bekki, and K. Satoh, 264–276. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar