Cover not available
Part of
Storytelling in the Digital World
Edited by Anna De Fina and Sabina M. Perrino
[Benjamins Current Topics 104] 2019
► pp. 79–103

“We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”

French Luso-descendants’ diasporic Facebook conarrations of vacation return trips to Portugal

This article combines the study of online narratives as social practices and the linguistic anthropological study of imagined communities, to examine a set of non-canonical narrative practices in a Facebook group for the Portuguese diaspora in France. Instead of reports of individual members’ past experiences, these narratives function as invitations to other group members to co-tell typical, shared experiences. Specifically, we investigate how group members share vacation trips to Portugal with each other in ways that produce a sense of collective and simultaneous experience. They accomplish this through deictically-based narrative strategies that shift the social, spatial, and temporal perspectives of narrating and narrated frames in ways that link the following: individual I’s with collective we’s, one-time events with timeless event types, and co-presence online with co-presence on vacation. Through these strategies, participants connect Facebook narrations of vacations to the larger social project of diasporic longing for and return to Portugal.
Keywords: narrative, Facebook, heritage tourism, diaspora, Portuguese descent, France, roots tourism, imagined community, nationalism, deictics
Article outline
  • Interactional approaches to narrative as social practice
  • Narrating nationalism
    • Narrating the ethnonational we’s on Facebook
  • The Portuguese diaspora in France, offline and online
    • Diasporic Facebook group: Tu sais que tu viens du Portugal Quand/ You know you come from Portugal when
    • Posting about vacation trips to Portugal
  • Creating collectivities and simultaneities
    • Anticipating departure
    • Simultaneity
    • Narrating shared Return to France
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.104.05sim
References (85)
References
Agha, A. (2005). Voicing, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 38–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). The study of language and space in media discourse. In P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Volume I: Theory and methods (pp. 740–758). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Axel, B. (2004). The context of diaspora. Cultural Anthropology, 19(1), 26–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baquedano-López, P. (2000). Narrating community in doctrina classes. Narrative Inquiry, 10(2), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4), 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basch, L., Glick-Schiller, N., & Szanton-Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound. Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments and deterritorialised nation-states. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Basu, P. (2007). Highland homecomings: Genealogy and heritage tourism in the Scottish diaspora. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, A. (2014). Children’s use of English ‘we’ in a primary school in Wales. In S. Pavlidou (Ed.) Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. (pp. 227–246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (2003). Voices of modernity. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, C. (2014). Grammar, interaction, and context: Unmarked and marked uses of the first-person plural in Italian. In S. Pavlidou (Ed.) Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. (pp. 83–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1971). Problems in general linguistics. Miami: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Bernal, V. (2005). Eritrea on-line: Diaspora, cyberspace, and the public sphere. American Ethnologist, 32(4), 660–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Diaspora, cyberspace, and political imagination: the Eritrean diaspora online. Global Networks, 6(2), 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brettell, C. (2003). Anthropology and migration: Essays on transnationalism, ethnicity, and identity. Walnut Creek, California: Altamira.Google Scholar
Charbit, Y., Hily, M. A., & Poinard, M. (1997). Le va-et-vient identitaire. Migrants Portugais et villages d’origine. Paris: Persée.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2016). Storytelling and audience reactions in social media. Language in Society, 45, 473–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakapoulou, A. (2015). Handbook of narrative analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. (1986). Declarations of Independence. New Political Science, 15, 7–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Villanova, R. (1988). Le portugais: une langue qui se ressource en circulant. In G. Vermès (Ed.), Vingt-cinq communautés linguistiques de la France (pp. 283–300). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Dick, H. (2010). Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist, 37(2), 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, G. (2014). Establishing social groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in political radio phone-in programs. In S. Pavlidou (Ed.), Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. (pp. 187–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos, I. (2010). Les brumes de la mémoire. Expérience migratoire et quête identitaire de descendants de Portugais de France (Doctoral thesis). Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1986). The audience as co-author: An introduction. Text, 6(3), 239–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenlohr, P. (2004). Temporalities of community: Ancestral language, pilgrimage, and diasporic belonging in Mauritius. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(1), 81–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fono, D., & Raynes-Goldie, K. (2006). Hyperfriends and beyond: Friend and social norms on LiveJournal. In M. Consalvo & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), Internet research annual Volume 4: Selected papers from the Association of Internet Researchers Conference. (pp. 91–103). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gal, S., & Woolard, K. (2001). Languages and publics. Manchester: St. Jerome’s.Google Scholar
Georgakapoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction, and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Introduction: Communicating time and place on digital media-multi-layered temporalities and (re)localizations. Discourse, Context, and Media, 9, 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981) [1979]. Footing. In E. Goffman, Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A. (1996). Imagens e Clivagens: Os residentes face aos emigrantes. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Toward families of stories in context. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 107–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. (2005). Dreams of blood: Zincantecs in Oregon. In M. Baynham & A. De Fina (Eds.), Dislocations/relocations (pp. 91–127). Manchester, UK: Saint Jerome’s.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2002). Grammar and function of ‘we.’ In A. Dusckak (Ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages (pp. 31–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, T., & Honkanen, M. (2015). From Naija to Chitown: The new African diaspora and digital representations of place. Discourse, Context, and Media, 9, 14–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. (1995). The voices of don Gabriel: Responsibility and self in a modren Mexicano narrative. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 97–147). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1957). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Koven, M. (2002). An analysis of speaker role inhabitance in narratives of personal experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(2), 167–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Transnational perspectives on sociolinguistic capital among Luso-descendants in France and Portugal. American Ethnologist, 31(2), 270–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Selves in two languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Speaking French in Portugal: An analysis of contested models of emigrant personhood in narratives about return migration and language use. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(3), 324–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Essentialization strategies in the storytellings of young Luso-Descendant women in France: Narrative, calibration, voicing, and scale. Language and Communication, 46, 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koven, M., & Simões Marques, I. (2015). Performing and evaluating (non)modernities of Portuguese migrant figures on YouTube: The case of Antonio de Carglouch. Language in Society, 44, 213–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leal, J. (2000). Etnografias Portuguesas (1870–1970). Cultura popular e Identidade Nacional. Lisboa: Dom Quixote. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, B. (1995). Performing the people. Pragmatics, 5(2), 263–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M., & Perrino, S. (2007). Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language and Communication, 27(3), 205–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (2013). Storytelling in conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.) Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 492–508). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muhlhauser, P., & Harre, R. (1990). Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Myers, G. & Lampropoulou, S. (2012). Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 44/10: 1206–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1994). Stories that step into the future. In D. Biber & E. Finnegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 106–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2000). Living narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, P. (1994). “You could feel it through your skin”: Agency and positioning in Prisoners’ stabbing stories. Text, 14(1), 45–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R. (2012). Stories and social media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, T. S. (2014). Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereira, V. (2016). Portuguese migrants and Portugal: Elite discourses and transnational practices. In N. Green & R. Waldinger (Eds.), A century of transnationalism: Immigrants and their homeland connections. Urbana: University of Illinois. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrino, S. (2007). Cross-chronotope alignment in Senegalese oral narrative. Language and Communication, 27(3), 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1979). So what’s the point? Semiotica 25 (3–4).Google Scholar
Rosen, C. (2007). Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. The New Atlantis, 17, 15–31.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language, 57(1), 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In K. Basso, H. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp. 11–55). Albuquergul, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
(1993). Metapragmatic discourse and function. In J. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language (pp. 33–57). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Whorfianism and the linguistic imagination of nationality. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language (pp. 85–138). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
(2003). The whens and wheres – as well as hows – of ethnolinguistic recognition. Public Culture, 15(3), 531–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Axes of evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stirling, L., & Manderson, L. (2011). About you: Empathy, objectivity, and authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 43/6, 1581–1602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsuda, T. (2009). Diasporic homecomings: Ethnic return migration in comparative perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Urban, G. (2000). Metaculture: How culture moves through the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, D. (2014). On the use of ‘we’ in Flemish World War II interviews. In S. Pavlidou (Ed.) Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. (pp. 309–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Social identity theory and the discursive analysis of collective identities in narratives. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakapoulou (Eds.) Handbook of narrative Analysis (pp. 408–428). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wagner, L. B. (2011). Negotiating diasporic mobilities and becomings: Interactions and practices of Europeans of Moroccan descent on holiday in Morocco (Doctoral thesis). London: University College London.Google Scholar
Whitt, R. J. (2014). Singular perception, multiple perspectives through ‘we’: Constructing intersubjective meaning in English and German. In S. Pavlidou (Ed.) Constructing collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts. (pp. 45–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1979). The conversational historical present alternation. Language, 55(1), 168–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S. (1996). Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering speakers’ footing. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 331–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Narratives in action. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

De Fina, Anna
2021. Doing narrative analysis from a narratives-as-practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.