Cover not available
Part of
(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Benjamins Current Topics 107] 2020
► pp. 1–10

(Im)politeness, morality and the internet

Much recent research has contributed to the emergence of a moral turn in (im)politeness scholarship, further confirming the evaluative nature of (im)politeness and the moral basis of (im)politeness evaluations, and further illuminating, among other things, what is really at work when (im)politeness evaluations take place, what the moral order consists of and how the moral order influences (im)politeness evaluations. Meanwhile, thanks to much emphasis on the instrumentality of words and utterances, a distinction can be discerned between ‘politeness without’ (or practical politeness) and ‘politeness within’ (or true politeness). Politeness within is true and truthful, but politeness without is not necessarily so. True politeness may be in when self is out. This volume aims to further foreground the link between (im)politeness and morality in people’s online interactions, revealing something about ourselves and about our life-worlds.
Keywords: (im)politeness, morality, practical politeness, true politeness, internet-mediated interactions
Article outline
  • 1.A moral turn in (im)politeness studies?
  • 2.(Im)politeness and morality
  • 3.The volume: When (im)politeness and morality meet on the internet
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.107.ip.00010.xie
References (50)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2018. “Face(t)s of self and identity in interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research 14(2): 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “(Im)politeness: Three issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1128–1133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Reciprocity and (im)politeness: Some reflections.” Invited lecture presented at College of Foreign Languages, Fujian Normal University, 31 October 2018. Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Bethan L. 2018. “Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order.” Journal of Politeness Research 14(1): 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems 11(3): 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon Book.Google Scholar
. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker. 2017. “(Im)politeness in digital communication.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Afterword: Theorizing (im)politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 14(1): 153–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Yasuhisa Watanabe. 2018. “(Im)politeness theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, ed. by Bernadette Vine, 65–76. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 239–260.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (trans. by Robert B. Louden). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German-English Edition (ed. and trans. by Mary Gregor, and Jens Timmermann). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Critique of Practical Reason (trans. and ed. by Mary Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel J. 2002. Kant’s Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. forthcoming. “‘An illusion of affability that inspires love’: Kant on the value and disvalue of politeness.” In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness, ed. by Chaoqun Xie. Cham: Springer.
Meier, A. J. 1995. “Passages of politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 24(4): 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2018. “How social is the internet? A pragmatic view.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “Mobile (im)politeness: The view from pragmatics.” In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness, ed. by Chaoqun Xie. Cham: Springer.
Mills, Sara. 2017. “Sociocultural approaches to (im)politeness.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 40–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh. 2015. “Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 207–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara, and Miriam A. Locher (eds.). 2015. Teaching and Learning (Im)Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. forthcoming. “(Im)politeness and the human subject.” In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness, ed. by Chaoqun Xie. Cham: Springer.
Schneider, Klaus P. 2012. “Appropriate behaviour across varieties of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1022–1037. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (ed.). 2016. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916 (2nd edn., trans. by G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1980. Culture and Value (trans. by Peter Winch). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun. 2008. “(Im)politeness: Towards an evaluative and embodied approach.” Pragmatics & Cognition 16(1): 151–175.Google Scholar
. 2011. 礼貌与模因：语用哲学思考 [Politeness and Memes: Philosophizing Pragmatics]. Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Internet pragmatics: Theory and practice.” Invited speech presented at the 1st China High-Level Forum on Pragmatics. Beijing Foreign Studies University, 29–30 October 2016.
. 2018. “(Im)politeness as a complex system.” Keynote speech presented at the International Symposium on Advances in (Im)politeness Studies 2018. Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 25–27 May.
Xie, Chaoqun, Ziran He, and Dajin Lin. 2005. “Politeness: Myth and truth.” Studies in Language 29(2): 431–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, and Francisco Yus. 2017. “An internet dialogue on internet pragmatics.” 外国语言文学 [Foreign Language and Literature Studies] 34(2): 75–92.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Introducing internet pragmatics.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Panpothong, Natthaporn & Siriporn Phakdeephasook
2022. “I Am Well-Loved by the Voters”: Self-Praise in Thai Political Discourse and Two Emic Concepts of Thai (Im)politeness. In Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.