The personal and/as the political
Small stories and impoliteness in online discussions of the Greek crisis
Drawing on our previous work on the role of small stories in social-mediatized engagements with the Greek socio-economic crisis
(Georgakopoulou 2014, 2015),
in this article, we set out to shed light on impoliteness on social media through the lens of small stories research. We
explore how Facebook and YouTube commenters “bash” political leaders and perceived political opponents and attribute blame to
them for the crisis, through comments that attest to specific links of doing impoliteness with storying the crisis. Bashing
has been previously related to the affective reactions of participants in online comments on current affairs. In this case, we
bring to the fore a salient combination in our data of (mainly on-record) impoliteness strategies for bashing politicians with
specific narrating positions in stories about the crisis: the narrator as sufferer, as witness of suffering, and as
spokesperson for collective suffering. We argue that in all these cases, on-record impoliteness is normally placed at the end
of a small story and presented as legitimated and justified by the preceding account. We conclude with the implications of the
association of impoliteness targeting public figures with social-mediatized processes of personalizing and constructing
expertise on the basis of experience on the one hand and, on the other hand, of jointly (re)asserting moral order in political
affairs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Impoliteness and political debates on Facebook and YouTube
- 2.Data and methods
- 2.1The political context of the data
- 2.2Analyzing impoliteness and small stories online
- 3.Impoliteness and small stories: Narrating positions and personal experience
- 3.1The narrator as sufferer
- 3.1.1The suffering subject as co-constructed between commenters
- 3.2The narrator as a witness of suffering
- 3.3The narrator as spokesperson for collective suffering
- 3.4Impoliteness and small stories: Sequential relations and actions
- 4.Personalizing impoliteness: Identities of expertise & (re)asserting moral order
- 5.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix