Cover not available
Part of
Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research
Edited by Robert Fuchs and Valentin Werner
[Benjamins Current Topics 108] 2020
► pp. 135–158

Can native-speaker corpora help explain L2 acquisition of tense and aspect?

A study of the “input”

 | West Virginia University
 | West Virginia University
This study investigates the distributional patterns of verb form frequencies in the Spanish past tense (the Preterit and the Imperfect) in the Corpus del Español (Davies, 2002). Following a usage-based approach, we examine the potential influence of input frequency as a driving factor in L2 learning. Results provide support for the existence of a distributional bias in L1 Spanish, with several telic predicates more often occurring in the Preterit and several atelic predicates in the Imperfect. Results also demonstrate that the distribution of verbs in the Preterit and the Imperfect is Zipfian, with the most frequent verbs overall accounting for the majority of all the tokens. Finally, an analysis of the different meanings of the Imperfect demonstrates clear differences in frequency of use with the continuous meaning as the most frequently expressed meaning, followed by habituality and progressivity. Implications for research and teaching are discussed.
Keywords: frequency effects, Spanish, Preterit, Imperfect, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Lexical and grammatical aspect
    • 2.2Describing and explaining L2 acquisition of past tense morphology
    • 2.3The present study
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1The corpus
    • 3.2Procedure
    • 3.3Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Frequency distributions of the Preterit and the Imperfect
    • 4.2Evidence of a Zipfian distribution
    • 4.3Most distinctively associated verbs of the Preterit and Imperfect
    • 4.4Distribution of the different meanings of the Imperfect
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.108.ijlcr.17001.tra
References (45)
References
Andersen, R. (1990). Verbal virtuosity and speakers’ purposes. In H. Burmeister & P. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition. Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language research forum (pp. 1–24). Eugene: University of Oregon, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Crosscurrents in SLA and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 309–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1994). The insider’s advantage. In A. Giacalone-Ramat & M. Vedovelli (Eds.), Italiano lingua seconda/lingua straniera Italian. Second language/foreign language: Acts of the 26th Congress of the Italian Linguistic Society (pp. 1–26). Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Arche, M. J. (2006). Individuals in time. Tense, aspect and the individual/stage distinction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition. Form, meaning, and use. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, C. L. (2013). Tense or aspect? A review of initial past tense marking and task conditions for beginning classroom learners of Spanish. Hispania, 96(4), 624–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Camps, J. (2002). Aspectual distinctions in Spanish as a foreign language: The early stages of oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 179–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The emergence of the imperfect in Spanish as a foreign language: The association between imperfective morphology and state verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 163–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 336–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & Salsbury, T. (2016). A usage-based investigation of L2 lexical acquisition: The role of input and output. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 702–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2002). Un corpus anotado de 100.000.000 palabras del español histórico y moderno. Sociedad Española para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 29, 21–27.Google Scholar
Dominguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M., Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 16(3), 558–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2013). Frequency-based grammar and the acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 learning. In M. R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 89–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzales, P. (1990). The imperfect-past progressive distinction in Spanish discourse. An aspectual analysis. Unpublished MA thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Gries, S. (2014). Coll.analysis 3.5. A script for R to compute perform collostructional analyses. Retrieved from: [URL]
Gries, S. & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2006). Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A. (2002). A corpus-based study of the L2-acquisition of the English verb system. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds.), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 77–116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafford, B. (1996, October). The development of tense/aspect relations in L2 Spanish narratives: Evidence to test competing theories. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum 1996, University of Arizona, United States.
Lee, E. & Kim, H. (2007). On crosslinguistic variations in imperfective aspect: The case of L2 Korean. Language Learning, 57, 651–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lope Blanche, J. M. (Ed.). (1977). Estudios sobre el Español Hablado en las Principales Ciudades de América. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar
Lopez-Ortega, N. R. (2000). Tense, aspect, and narrative structure in Spanish as a second language. Hispania, 83, 488–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. (2015). Second language acquisition theory and learner corpus research. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 309–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. & Mitchell, R. (2012). Learning French from ages 5, 7, and 11. An investigation into starting ages, rates, and routes of learning amongst early foreign language learners. ESRC End of Award Report RES-062-23-1545. Retrieved from [URL]
Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20, 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Tense aspect in verbal morphology. Hispania, 86, 559–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition. A theoretical model. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Salaberry, R. & Ayoun, D. (2005). The development of tense-aspect in romance languages. In D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages. Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition. Simplified input and prototype. PhD thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
(2010). Semantic bias and morphological regularity in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: What is the relation? Linguistics, 48, 171–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J. M. (2002). The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (2010). The influence of lexical aspect and input frequency in the L2 French of adult beginners. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 169–196. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N. & Myles, F. (2015). The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 58–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality. The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language. An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar