Part of
Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic UnitsEdited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Benjamins Current Topics 114] 2021
► pp. 39–58
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Benjamins Current Topics 114] 2021
► pp. 39–58
Linguistic units and their systems
Completeness, self-reference, and contingency
A theoretical discussion of units in linguistic theory would be, in a sense, incomplete without a discussion of the systems, whether overt or implied, that the units are associated with. This paper traces conceptualizations of units and their accompanying systems in several disciplines. We identify some important problems with rule-based accounts (Parsons 1937) of social action and discuss the transition to non-rule-based theory afforded by ethnomethodology (e.g. Garfinkel 1963, 1967; Heritage 1984, 2011). We draw direct parallels between these issues and analogous developments in mathematical logic (Gödel 1992) and philosophy of mind (Fodor 1968, 1983; Lucas 1961; Putnam 1960, 1967 etc.), and argue that these stem directly from fundamental properties of a class of all formal systems which permit self-reference. We argue that, since these issues are architectural in nature, linguistic theory which postulates that linguistic units are the outputs of a consistent, self-referential, rule-based formal systems (e.g. Hauser, Chomsky & Fitch 2002) will inevitably run into similar problems. This is further supported by examples from actual language use which, as a class, will elude any theoretical explanation grounded in such a system.
Keywords: units, actions, incompleteness, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, formal system, rules, norms, Gödel, online speech, contingency, isotropy
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Social action, unit acts, interaction
- 3.Systems and incompleteness
- 4.Some deviant utterances
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Notes -
References
References
Braithewaite, R. B.
1992 Introduction. In Kurt Gödel (ed.), On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. New York: Dover. 
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chafe, Wallace
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fodor, J. A.
1968 Psychological Explanation. New York: Random House.
1983 The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2001 The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra Thompson
2013 Units and/or Action Trajectories? The language of grammatical categories and the language of social action. In Beatrice Szczepek-Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of Talk – Units of Action, 13–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, Harold
1963 A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction, 187–238. New York: Ronald Press.
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Gawne, Lauren & Jill Vaughan
2011 I can haz language play: The construction of language and identity in LOLspeak. Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference.
Geertz, Clifford
1983 Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
Gödel, Kurt
1931 Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38. 173–98.
1992 On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. Trans. B. Meltzer, with Intro. by R. B. Braithwaite. New York: Dover.
Goodwin, Charles
1979 The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, 97–121. New York: Irvington.
Grosholz, Emily R.
2016 Leibnizian analysis, canonical objects, and generalization. In Karine Chemla, Renaud Chorlay & David Rabouin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Generality in Mathematics and the Sciences, 329–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579.
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2011 A Galilean Moment in Social Theory? Language, Culture and their Emergent Properties. Qualitative Sociology 34(1). 263–270.
Hopcroft, John & Jeffrey Ullman
1979 Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hopper, Paul
1987 Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13. 139–157.
2011 Emergent Grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 22–44. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015 A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26. 161–210.
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Contextual and Interactional Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
2013 The dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building: Processes and resources. In Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds.), Units of Talk – Units of Action, 57–90. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lucas, J. R.
1961 Minds, Machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36. 112–127.
Parsons, Talcott
1937 The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
Putnam, Hilary
1960 Minds and machines. In Sidney Hook (ed.), Dimensions of Mind, 20–33. New York: New York University Press.
1967 The Nature of Mental States. In W. H. Capitan & D. D. Merrill (eds.), Art, Mind, and Religion, 51–58. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
1988 Representation and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1999 The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body, and World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosch, E.
1973 Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.
1975 Universals and cultural specifics in human categorization. In R. Brislin, S. Bochner & W. Lonner (eds.), Cross-cultural Perspectives on Learning. New York: Halstead Press.
1983 Prototype Classification and Logical Classification: The Two Systems. In E. F. Scholnick (ed.), New Trends in Conceptual Representation: Challenges to Piaget’s Theory?, 73–86. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E. & C. B. Mervis
1975 Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573–605.
Sacks, H.
1992 Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II. Ed. G. Jefferson with Introduction by E. A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996a Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff & S. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar, 52–133. Cambridge University Press.
1996b Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action. American Journal of Sociology 102(1). 161–216.
Schütz, Alfred
1959 Type and Eidos in Husserl’s Late Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20(2). 147–165.
Serény, György
2003 Gödel, Tarski, Church, and the Liar. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9(1). 3–25.
Suppes, Patrick
1957 Introduction to Logic, New York: D. Van Nostrand.
Whitehead, Alfred North & Bertrand Russell
1910 Principia Mathematica, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1912 Principia Mathematica, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1913 Principia Mathematica, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L.
1953 Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.
Zimmer, Benjamin & Charles E. Carson
2011 Among the New Words. American Speech 86(4). 454–479.