Cover not available
Part of
Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Benjamins Current Topics 116] 2021
► pp. 93–115

Verbal working memory as a predictor of explicit and implicit knowledge of English passive voice

| Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz | State University of Applied Sciences, Konin
| Pomeranian University, Słupsk
While there is copious evidence concerning the effectiveness of different instructional options in teaching grammar (e.g., Nassaji, 2017; Pawlak, 2017), less is known about the extent to which the contribution of pedagogical intervention is mediated by individual factors. The same can be said about the product of instructed but also uninstructed second language acquisition, that is the knowledge of target language grammar. The chapter attempts to shed light on one such variable, that is working memory, which has recently been an object of intensive empirical inquiry (e.g., Li, 2017; Wen, Biedroń, & Skehan, 2016). It reports the results of a study that investigated the role of verbal working memory in the development of explicit and implicit knowledge of the English passive voice. Participants were 156 Polish university students enrolled in a three-year BA program in English. The data on verbal working memory were collected by means of the Polish Listening Span Test (PLSPAN), developed by Zychowicz, Biedroń and Pawlak (2017). Explicit knowledge was tapped by means of an untimed grammatically judgment test, which focused on reception, and a traditional grammar test, which targeted production. Implicit knowledge was tapped through a timed grammaticality judgment test for reception and a focused communication task (Ellis, 2003) for production. Correlational analysis demonstrated that verbal working memory was a weak predictor of explicit productive and receptive knowledge but not implicit knowledge.
Keywords: working memory, central executive, automatized knowledge, passive voice, production vs. comprehension
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Working memory
    • 2.2Explicit and implicit L2 knowledge
    • 2.3The role of the central executive in learning L2 grammar
    • 2.4The CE and the development of implicit and explicit grammar knowledge
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Aims and research questions
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Targeted structure
    • 3.4Data collection and analysis
    • 3.5Findings
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.116.05paw
References (74)
References
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Working memory: Theories, models and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language acquisition device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). The interface between research on individual difference variables and teaching practice: The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 395–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A., & Szczepaniak, A. (2012). Working-memory and short-term memory abilities in accomplished multilinguals. Modern Language Journal, 96, 290–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2013). Applying Cognitive Grammar in the foreign language classroom: Teaching English tense and aspect. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (2008). Variation in working memory. An introduction. In A. R. A. Conway, Ch. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York, NY: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Skill-acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 94–122). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017). Knowledge and skill in SLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437–454). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 395–407). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J. (2013). Optimizing post-critical-period language learning. In G. Granena & M. H. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 153–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. J., Campbell, S. G., Mislevy, M. A., Bunting, M. F., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S-K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 10–31). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Retrieved from <[URL]>, document #2382.
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal Teddy Bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). 2009. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Engel de Abreu, P., & Gathercole, S. E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 974–986.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortkamp, M. B. M. (1999). Working memory capacity and aspects of L2 speech production. Communication and Cognition, 32, 259–296.Google Scholar
(2003). Working memory capacity and fluency, accuracy, complexity and lexical density in L2 speech production. Fragmentos, 24, 69–104.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, X. (2013). The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 423–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Learning grammar: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Henle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Leeser, M. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The differential roles of language analytic ability and working memory in mediating the effects of two types of feedback on the acquisition of an opaque linguistic structure. In C. Sanz & B. Lado (Eds.), Individual differences, L2 development & language program administration: From theory to application (pp. 32–52). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
(2017). Cognitive differences in SLA. In S. Loewen, & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 396–417). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y. (2019). The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological STM and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 379–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H. (2017). Grammar acquisition. In S. Loewen, & Sato, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 205–223). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 377–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 98–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Individual difference variables as mediating influences on success or failure in form-focused instruction. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel, E. Szymańska-Czaplak, & M. Szyszka (Eds.), At the crossroads: Challenges of foreign language learning (pp. 75–92). Heidelberg: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Tapping the distinction between explicit and implicit knowledge: Methodological issues. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Contacts & contrasts in educational contexts and translation (pp. 45–60). Heidelberg: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A. (2015). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–679). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381–395). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017a). Exploratory research on second language practice distribution: An aptitude × treatment interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2017b). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in asecond language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67, 747–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagarelli, K. M., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Working memory, learning conditions, and the acquisition of L2 syntax. In Z. Wen, M. Borges Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: theory, research and commentary (pp. 224–247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2015). The declarative/procedural model. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 135–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachinske, I. (2017). Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, E. Z. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The Phonological/Executive model. In E. Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41–62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Working memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated approach. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, E. Z., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude.” Ilha Do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60, 15–44.Google Scholar
Wen, E. Z., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2016). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50(1), 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wen, E. Z., Mota, M. B., & McNeill, A. (Eds.). (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427–441). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2015). Working memory and L2 development across the lifespan: A commentary. In E. Z. Wen, M. B. Mota, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 224–247). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R. (2015). Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zychowicz, K., Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2017). Polish Listening Span: A new tool for measuring verbal working memory. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 601–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar