Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Internet Memes
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Benjamins Current Topics 120] 2022
► pp. 36–63

Stylistic humor across modalities

| University of Neuchâtel

This paper is concerned with ‘Classical Art Memes’, a category of internet memes that distinctively derives its visual input from classical and medieval art. I specifically show that humor in Classical Art Memes arises from incongruity among different stylistic varieties, namely a colloquial linguistic expression in the text and a classical-style artwork in the image. Given that stylistic incongruity cross-cuts modalities, I further argue that Classical Art Memes make a case for what I call ‘multimodal stylistic humor’. The analysis is based on a small corpus of when-memes, whereby the image complements a when-clause. The findings of the study suggest that humor in Classical Art Memes serves to convey affective meanings that emerge from the embodied affect in the image that is textually recontextualized in contemporary terms. Such meanings ultimately convey a critical commentary on knowable features of modern life.

Keywords: Classical Art Memes, multimodal stylistic humor, affect, image, recontextulization, stylistic incongruity, intertextuality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Classical Art Memes: Intertextuality and stylistic humor
  • 3.The General Theory of Verbal Humor
  • 4.The data
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Emotion-based Classical Art Memes
    • 5.2Situation-based Classical Art Memes
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 May 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.120.03pia
References
Archakis, Argiris, Sofia Lampropoulou, Villy Tsakona, and Vasia Tsami
2014 “Linguistic varieties in style: Humorous representations in Greek mass culture texts.” Discourse, Context & Media 3: 46–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001 Humorous Texts: Α Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “A commentary on Antonopoulou and Nikiforidou.” In Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, ed. by Geert Brône, and Jeroen Vandaele, 315–317. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (trans. by Vern W. McGee). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Burgress, Jean
2007 “Vernacular creativity and new media.” Unpublished PhD dissertaion, Queensland University of Technology. [URL] (accessed 8 August 2018).
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser
2014 Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Lieven Vandelanotte
2017 “Internet memes as multimodal constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 28(3): 565–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Corey B., Mark Glantz, and David R. Novak
2016 “ ‘You can’t run your SUV on cute. Let’s go!’: Internet memes as delegitimizing discourse.” Environmental Communication 10(1): 62–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul
1989 “The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion.” In Handbook of Social Psychophysiology, ed. by Hugh Wagner, and Antony Mansted, 143–164. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Noam, Limor Shifman, and Zohar Kampf
2013 “ ‘It Gets Better’: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity.” New Media and Society 17(1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gendron, Maria, Debi Roberson, Jacoba Marietta van der Vyver, and Lisa Fieldman Barrett
2014 “Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: Evidence from a remote culture.” Emotion 14(2): 251–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language@Internet 4, article 1. [URL] (accessed 8 May 2018).
Jack, Rachel, Oliver Garrod, Hui Yu, Roberto Caldara, and Philippe Schyns
2012 “Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(19): 7241–7244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knobel, Michele, and Colin Lankshear
2007 “Online memes, affinities, and cultural production.” In A New Literacies Sampler, ed. by Michele Knobel, and Colin Lankshear, 199–227. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2000 Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2015 “Surprise as a conceptual category.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13(2): 270–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia
1980 Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (trans. by Leon Roudiez). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lou, Adrian
2017 “Multimodal simile: The ‘when’ meme in social media discourse.” English Text Construction 10(1): 106–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, Ryan M.
2013 “Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement.” International Journal of Communication 7: 2357–2390.
Norrick, Neal
1989 “Intertextuality in humor.” Humor 2(2): 117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan Scott
2006 The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piata, Anna
2018 “On-line humorous representations of the 2015 Greek national elections: Acting and interacting about politics on social media.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 257–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raivio, Oskari
2016 “Classical Art Memes as an affinity space. A faceted classification on an online entertainment page.” MA thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL] (accessed 18 August 2017).
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2017 “Digital cultures of political participation: Internet memes and the discursive delegitimization of the 2016 U.S presidential candidates.” Discourse, Context & Media 16: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2007 “Humor in the age of digital reproduction: Continuity and change in internet-based comic texts.” International Journal of Communication 1: 187–209.Google Scholar
2011 “An anatomy of a YouTube meme.” New Media and Society 14(2): 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18(3): 362–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Soriano, Salinas, Fontaine Johnny Cristina, and Klaus Scherer
2015 “Surprise in the GRID.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13(2): 436–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Cole
2011 Epic Win for Anonymous: How 4chan’s Army Conquered the Web. New York: Overlook Duckworth.Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Language and image interaction in cartoons: Towards a multimodal theory of humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(6): 1171–1188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Intertextuality and/in political jokes.” Lingua 203: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Bradley E., and Bret G. Bowers
2014 “Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape.” New Media and Society 17(11): 1886–1906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Fransisco
2011 Cyperpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar