Article published in:Creole Languages and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Parth Bhatt and Tonjes Veenstra
[Benjamins Current Topics 57] 2013
► pp. 95–140
Pidgin-creoles as a scattered sprachbund
Comparing Kriyol and Nubi
That creole languages resemble each other beyond the diversity of their lexifiers and formative environments is a fact. Similarity should not be overstated, however, as creole languages also differ from each other in important ways. Hence the fundamental issues of creole studies: why are Creoles similar and what makes them different? What kind of a language group do they constitute? A genetic family they certainly are not, nor are they a typological group: creole languages do not constitute a type of their own. Assuming universal grammar viewed as a language bioprogram (LB) to be the principle of creole similarity strongly overstates this similarity. Moreover there are reasons to doubt the reality of the LB. Actually the kind of partial similarities exhibited by creole languages looks rather like what languages in a sprachbund or linguistic area have in common. How can languages scattered all over the world constitute an area, though? An answer is proposed in this study, which rests on the assumption that creole languages constitute a virtual (non-spatial) area by virtue of their very similar origins, namely strong punctuations involving Basic Variety (pidgin) episodes.
Published online: 18 December 2013