Article published in:
Current Issues in PhraseologyEdited by Sebastian Hoffmann, Bettina Fischer-Starcke and Andrea Sand
[Benjamins Current Topics 74] 2015
► pp. 83–108
The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing
Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm
Matthew Brook O'Donnell | University of Michigan
Ute Römer | Georgia State University
Nick C. Ellis | University of Michigan
Formulaic sequences are recognised as having important roles in language acquisition, processing, fluency, idiomaticity, and instruction. But there is little agreement over their definition and measurement, or on methods of corpus comparison. We argue that replicable research must be grounded upon operational definitions in statistical terms. We adopt an experimental design and apply four different corpus-analytic measures, variously based upon n-gram frequency (Frequency-grams), association (MI-grams), phrase-frames (P-frames), and native norm (items in the Academic Formulas List – AFL-grams), to samples of first and second language writing in order to examine and compare knowledge of formulas in first and second language acquisition as a function of proficiency and language background. We find that these different operationalizations produce different patterns of effect of expertise and L1/L2 status. We consider the implications for corpus design and methods of analysis.
Published online: 10 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.74.05odo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.74.05odo
References
Ädel, A. & Römer, U
Arnon, I. & Snider, N
Bannard, C. & Matthews, D
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Cortes, V
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
Bod, R
2001 “Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences”. Paper presented at the
CUNY-2001
,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
.
Bybee, J
2005 “From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition”. Paper presented at the
Linguistic Society of America
,
Oakland
.
Cheng, W., Greaves, C. & Warren, M
Conklin, K. & Schmitt, N
Cowie, A.P
Daudaravičius, V. & Marcinkevičienė, R
Durrant, P. & Doherty, A
Ellis, N.C
Ellis, N.C. & Cadierno, T
Ellis, N.C., Frey, E. & Jalkanen, I
Ellis, N.C. & Simpson-Vlach, R
Ellis, N.C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C
Evert, S
Fletcher, W.H
2002–2007. KfNgram. Annapolis, MD: USNA.
Flowerdew, J. & Peacock, M
Granger, S. & Meunier
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M
Gries, St. Th
Gries, St. Th. & Divjak, D.S
Gries, St. Th. & Stefanowitsch, A
Gries, St. Th. & Wulff, S
Gurevich, O., Johnson, M.A. & Goldberg, A.E
Guthrie, D., Allison, B., Lin, W., Guthrie, L. & Wilks, Y
2006 “A closer look at skip-gram modelling”. In
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC-2006
.
Genoa, Italy
, 2006, 1222–1225.
Hoey, M
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. & Raymond, W.D
Karmarker, N. & Karp, R.M
Leech, G.N
Manning, C.D. & Schütze, H
Nattinger, J.R. & DeCarrico, J
O’Donnell, M.B. & Römer, U
In preparation. “Investigating the interaction between phraseological items and textual position”.
Paquot, M. & Bestgen, Y
Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H
Robinson, P. & Ellis, N.C
Römer, U
Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M.B
Scott, M. & Tribble, C
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N.C
Sinclair, J. McH
Sinclair, J.McH
2005 “The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase”. Paper presented at
Phraseology 2005
,
Louvain
.
Stubbs, M
Stubbs, M. & Barth, I
Swales, J.M
Swinney, D.A. & Cutler, A
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G. & Westbury, C
Wray, A