Cover not available
Part of
Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 79–99

Hittite pai- ‘go’ and uwa- ‘come’ as Restructuring Verbs

| University of California, Los Angeles
The present article provides a new syntactic analysis of the Hittite phraseological construction involving the verbs pai- ‘go’ or uwa- ‘come’ and a second finite verb. Most approaches have treated the construction as monoclausal in terms of verb serialization (Garrett 1990). This study will take a different approach, arguing that pai- and uwa- select a phrasal complement. The features that apparently set the construction apart from other cases of embedding in Hittite will be explained as effects of Restructuring (Rizzi 1982), a phenomenon Hittite also exhibits outside of the construction in question. It will further be argued that uwa- functions as a raising verb while pai- functions as a control verb, accounting for the differences in syntactic behavior between the two.
Published online: 16 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.75.05kol
References (21)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial Verb Constructions in Typological Perspective. Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1989. Object Sharing in Serial Verb Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20.513–553.Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline. 1993. The Hittite Particle -z/-za. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Disterheft, Dorothy. 1984. Non-Final Verbs in Hittite. Historische Sprachforschung 97.221–227.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George E. 1985. IE Hortatory *éy, *éyte: Ved. éta … stávāma, Hitt. ehu=wa it, Hom. εἰ δ’ ἄγε. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 46.47–79.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1997. Grammatical Structures in Verb Serialization. Complex Predicates ed. by Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells, 289–354. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew James. 1990. Hittite Enclitic Subjects and Transitive Verbs. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 42.227–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Wackernagel’s Law and Unaccusativity in Hittite. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena ed. by Aaron L. Halpern & Arnold M. Zwicky, 85–133. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. & H. Craig Melchert. 2008. A Grammar of the Hittite Language. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. & Nina M. Hyams. 1993. On the Independence and Interdependence of Syntactic and Morphological Properties: English Aspectual Come and Go. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 11.313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2004. The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22.811–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 1993. Verb Serialization and Word Order: Evidence from Hittite. Historical Linguistics 1989: Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, New Brunswick, 14–18 August 1989 ed. by Henk Aertsen & Robert J. Jeffers, 267–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neu, Erich. 1995. Futur im Hethitischen? Verba et Structurae: Festschrift für Klaus Strunk zum 65. Geburtstag ed. by Heinrich Hettrich, Wolfgang Hock, Peter-Arnold Mumm & Norbert Oettinger, 195–202. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Rieken, Elisabeth. 2010. Die periphrastischen Konstruktionen mit pai- “gehen” und uwa- “kommen” im Hethitischen. Investigationes Anatolicae: Gedenkschrift für Erich Neu (=Studien zu den Boǧazköy-Texten, 52) ed. by Jörg Klinger, Elisabeth Rieken & Christel Rüster, 217–239. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rizza, Alfredo. 2007. I Pronomi enclitici nei testi etei di traduzione dal hattico. (= Studia Mediterranea, 20.) Pavia: Iuculano.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto. 1996. Clitic Climbing from Finite Clauses and Tense Raising. Probus 8.273–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tjerkstra, Françoise A. 1999. Principles of the Relation between Local Adverb, Verb and Sentence Particle in Hittite. Groningen: STYX Publications.Google Scholar
van den Hout, Theo. 2003. Studies in the Hittite Phraseological Construction I: Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties. Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner, Jr. on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday ed. by Gary Beckman, Richard Beal & Gregory McMahon, 177–204. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
. 2010. Studies in the Hittite Phraseological Construction II: Its Origin. Studia Anatolica in memoriam Erich Neu dicata (=Hethitica, XVI) ed. by René Lebrun & Julien De Vos, 191–204. Louvain-La-Nouve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Luraghi, Silvia
2020. From verb to New Event Marker. Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 788 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.