Article published in:

Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 125–156

Toward a syntactic phylogeny of modern Indo-European languages

Giuseppe Longobardi | University of Trieste

Cristina Guardiano | University of York

Giuseppina Silvestri | University of Modena e Reggio Emilia

Alessio Boattini | University of Pisa

Andrea Ceolin | University of Bologna

The Parametric Comparison Method (PCM, Guardiano & Longobardi 2005, Longobardi & Guardiano 2009) is grounded on the assumption that syntactic parameters are more appropriate than other traits for use as comparanda for historical reconstruction, because they are able to provide unambiguous correspondences and objective measurements, thus guaranteeing wide-range applicability and quantitative exactness. This article discusses a set of experiments explicitly designed to evaluate the impact of parametric syntax in representing historical relatedness, and performed on a selection of 26 contemporary Indo-European varieties. The results show that PCM is in fact able to correctly identify genealogical relations even from modern languages only, performing as accurately as lexical methods, and that its effectiveness is not limited by interference effects such as ‘horizontal’ transmission. PCM is thus validated as a powerful tool for the analysis of historical relationships not only on a long-range perspective (as suggested by Longobardi & Guardiano 2009), but even on more focused, though independently well-known domains.

Published online: 16 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.75.07lon

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Dinu, Anca, Liviu P. Dinu, Laura Franzoi & Andrea Sgarro

2018. In Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 853], ► pp. 171 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman & Melita Stavrou

2007 Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Baker, Mark C.

1996 The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2001 The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.

Barbançon, François G., Steven N. Evans, Luay Nakhleh, Donald Ringe & Tandy Warnow

2013 An Experimental Study Comparing Linguistic Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods. Diachronica 30:2, 143–170. 10.1075/dia.30.2.01bar.

Biberauer, Theresa

ed. 2008 The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bortolussi, Luca, Giuseppe Longobardi, Cristina Guardiano & Andrea Sgarro

2011 How Many Possible Languages Are There? Biology, Computation and Liguistics ed. by Gemma Bel-Enguix, Verónica Dahl & Maria Dolores Jiménez-López, 168–179. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Bošković, Željko

2008a What Will You Have, DP or NP? Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37 ed. by Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow, 101–114. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

2008b The NP/DP Analysis and Slovenian. Proceedings of the Novi Sad Generative Syntax Workshop ed. by Ljiljana Subotić, 53–73. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu.

2010 On NP and Clauses. Ms. University of Connecticut.

Bromham, Lindel & David Penny

2003 The Modern Molecular Clock. Nature Reviews Genetics 4.216–224.

Chomsky, Noam

1975 Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.

1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Colonna, Vincenza, Teresa Nutile & Ronald R. Ferrucci

2009 Comparing Population Structure as Inferred from Genealogical Versus Genetic Information. European Journal of Human Genetics 17.1635–1641.

van Cort, Tracy

2001 Computational Evolutionary Linguistics: Tree-based Models of Language Change. Pomona, CA: Harvey Mudd College PhD Dissertation.

Dunn, Michael, Angela Terrill, Ger Reesink, Robert A. Foley & Stephen C. Levinson

2005 Structural Phylogenetics and the Reconstruction of Ancient Language History. Science 309:5743.2072–2075.

Dyen, Isidore, Joseph B. Kruskal & Paul Black

1992 An Indoeuropean Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82:5.1–132.

Edwards, Anthony W.F., & Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza

1963 The Reconstruction of Evolution. Annals of Human Genetics 27.105–106.

Embleton, Sheila M.

1986 Statistics in Historical Linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.

Felsenstein, Joseph

1993 PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genetics, University of Washington.

2004 Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Ghomeshi, Jila, Ileana Paul & Martina Wiltschko

eds. 2009 Determiners: Universals and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gimbutas, Marija

1973 The Beginning of the Bronze Age in Europe and the Indo-Europeans 3500/2500 B.C. Journal of Indo-European Studies 1.163–214.

Gray, Russel D. & Quentin D. Atkinson

2003 Language Tree Divergences Support the Anatolian Theory of Indo-European Origin. Nature 426.435–439.

Guardiano, Cristina & Giuseppe Longobardi

2005 Parametric Comparison and Language Taxonomy. Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation ed. by Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, 149–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guardiano, Cristina & Melita Stavrou

2014 Greek and Romance in Southern Italy: History and Contact in Nominal Structures. L’Italia Dialettale LXXV, 121–147.

Harris, Martin & Nigel Vincent

eds. 1988 The Romance Languages. London: Routledge.

Heggarty, Paul

2006 Interdisciplinary Indiscipline? Can Phylogenetic Methods Meaningfully be Applied to Language Data — And to Dating Language? Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages ed. by James Clackson, Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew, 183–194. Cambridge: McDonalds Institute for Archaeological Research.

Hickey, Raymond

ed. 2010 The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

① ② ③

Hock, Hans H. & Brian D. Joseph

1996 Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Holtus, Günter, Michael Metzeltin & Christian Schmitt

eds. 1988–2005 Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik (LRL). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant

2006 Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:2.254–267.

Joseph, Brian D.

1999 Romanian and the Balkans: Some Comparative Perspectives. The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences: Studies on the Transition from Historical-Comparative to Structural Linguistics in Honour of E.F.K. Koerner, Vol. 2 ed. by Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe, 218–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kayne, Richard

2000 Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.

Keenan, Edward L. & Denis Paperno

eds. 2012 Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language. (= Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 90.) Dordrecht: Springer.

Lazzeroni, Romano

1968 Per una definizione dell’unita indo-iranica. Studi e Saggi Linguistici. Supplement to L’Italia Dialettale 8.131–159.

1998 Sanskrit. The Indo-European Languages ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paolo Ramat. London: Routledge.

Lightfoot, David

1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

1991 How to Set Parameters. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lindenbauer, Petrea, Michael Metzeltin & Margit Thir

1995 Die romanischen Sprachen: Eine einführende Übersicht. Wilhelmsfeld: Egert.

Lohr, Marisa

1998 Methods for the Genetic Classification of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University PhD dissertation.

Longobardi, Giuseppe

1994 Reference and Proper Names. Linguistic Inquiry 25:4.609–665.

2001 How Comparative is Semantics? A Unified Parametric Theory of Bare Nouns and Proper Names. Natural Language Semantics 9.335–369.

2003 Methods in Parametric Linguistics and Cognitive History. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3.101–138.

2005 A Minimalist Program for Parametric Linguistics? Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies for Henk van Riemsdijk ed. by Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster, 407–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

2008 Reference to Individuals, Person, and the Variety of Mapping Parameters. Essays on Nominal Determination ed. by Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg Müller, 189–211. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

2012 Convergence in Parametric Phylogenies: Homoplasy or Principled Explanation? Parameter Theory and Language Change ed. by Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar, 304–319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Longobardi, Giuseppe & Cristina Guardiano

2009 Evidence for Syntax as a Signal of Historical Relatedness. Lingua 119:11.1679–1706.

McMahon, April

2010 Computational Models and Language Contact. In Raymond Hickey, ed., The Handbook of Language Contact, 31–47. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

McMahon, April, Paul Heggarty, Robert McMahon & Natalia Slaska

2005 Swadesh Sublists and the Benefits of Borrowing: An Andean Case Study. Quantitative Methods in Language Comparison (= Transactions of the Philological Society, 103:2) ed. by April McMahon, 147–169. Oxford: Blackwell.

McMahon, April & Robert McMahon

2003 Finding Families: Quantitative Methods in Language Classifying. Transaction of the Philological Society 101:1.7–55.

2005 Language Classification by Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meillet, Antoine

1905 Avertissement. Abrégé de grammaire comparée des langues indo-européennes d’après le Précis de grammaire comparée de K. Brugmann et B. Delbrück ed. by Antoine Meillet & Robert Gauthiot, i–v. Paris: Klincksieck.

1922 Les dialectes indo-européens. Paris: Champion.

1924 Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.

Nakhleh, Luay, Tandy Warnow, Don Ringe & Steven N. Evans

2005 A Comparison of Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods on an IE Dataset. Transactions of the Philological Society 3:2.171–192.

Nelson-Sathi, Shijula, Johann Mattis List, Hans Geisler, Heiner Frangerau, Russel D. Gray, William Martin & Tal Dagan

2010 Networks Uncover Hidden Lexical Borrowing in Indo-European Language Evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological sciences 1713.1794–1803.

Nichols, Johanna

1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Noonan, Michael

2010 Genetic Classification and Language Contact. In Raymond Hickey, ed., The Handbook of Language Contact, 48–65.

Pellegrini, Giovan Battista

1977 Carta dei dialetti d’Italia. Pisa: Pacini.

Plank, Frans

ed. 2003 Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Pritchard, Jonathan K., Matthew Stephens & Peter Donnelly

2000 Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data. Genetics 155.945–959.

Reesink, Ger, Ruth Singer & Michael Dunn

2009 Explaining the Linguistic Diversity of Sahul Using Population Models. PLoS Biology 7:11. e1000241.

Renfrew, Colin

1987 Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. London: Jonathan Cape.

Renzi, Lorenzo & Gianpaolo Salvi

1994 Nuova Introduzione alla filologia romanza. Bologna: Il Mulino.

Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor

2002 Indo-European and Computational Cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100:1.59–129.

Rigon, Gabriele

2009 A Quantitative Approach to the Study of Syntactic Evolution. Pisa: Università di Pisa PhD dissertation.

2012 An Evolutionary Perspective on Diachronic Syntax. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 50:2.31–95.

Roberts, Ian

1998 Review of Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 74) by Alice Harris & Lyle Campbell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995). Romance Philology 51.363–370.

2012 The Mystery of the Overlooked Discipline: Modern Syntactic Theory and Cognitive Science. Available at http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001611.

Schleicher, August

1861–1862 Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indo-germanischen Sprachen: Kurzer Abriß einer Laut- und Formenlehre der indo-germanischen Ursprache. Weimar: Böhlau.

Schmidt, Johannes

1872 Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.

Sokal, Robert R. & Charles D. Michener

1958 A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38.1409–1438.

Swadesh, Morris

1950 Salish Internal Relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics 16.157–167.

Swofford, David L.

2003 PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Szemerényi, Oswald

1957 The Problem of Balto-Slav Unity. Kratylos 2.97–123.

Tagliavini, Carlo

1972 Le origini delle lingue neolatine. Introduzione alla filologia romanza. Bologna: Pàtron.

Thomason, Sarah G.

2000 Linguistic Areas and Language History. Languages in Contact ed. by Dicky Gilbers, John Nerbonne & Jos Schaeken, 311–327. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

2004 Rule Borrowing. Ms., University of Michigan.

2010 Contact Explanations in Linguistics. In Raymond Hickey, ed., The Handbook of Language Contact, 31–47.

Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman

1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Tomić, Olga M.

2003 The Balkan Sprachbund Properties. Topics in Balkan Syntax and Semantics ed. by Olga M. Tomić, 1–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Turakulov, Rust & Simon Easteal

2003 Number of SNPs Loci Needed to Detect Population Structure. Human Heredity 55.37–45.

Willis, David

2008 Celtic and English Language Contact and Shift. 2nd Historical Sociolinguistics Network Summer School. University of Bristol, 7–13 August 2008.