Part of
Argumentation in Political Deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
[Benjamins Current Topics 76] 2015
► pp. 19
References
Aikin, Scott F., and John Casey
2011 “Straw men, weak men, and hollow men.” Argumentation 25 (1): 87–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle
2007On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (George A. Kennedy, trans.), 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asen, Robert
(Ed.) 2010 “Rhetoric and public policy.” Special issue of Rhetoric and Public Affairs 13 (1): 1–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, Simon Niemeyer, Michael Neblo, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Jürg Steiner
2010 “Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 32–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Simone
2009 “Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?Political Theory 37 (3): 323–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S.
2000Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., and Carolyn M. Hendriks
2012 “Fostering deliberation in the forum and beyond.” In The argumentative turn revisited, ed. by Frank Fischer, and Herbert Gottweis, 31–57. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, Constanza Ihnen, and Marcin Lewiński
2010 “Contextual considerations in the evaluation of argumentation.” In Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation, ed. by Chris Reed, and Christopher W. Tindale, 115–132. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013 “Argument, deliberation, dialectic and the nature of the political: A CDA perspective”. In “Symposium on Isabela Fairclough and Norman Fairclough, Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students”, special issue of Political Studies Review 11 (3): 336–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Frank, and Herbert Gottweis
(Eds.) (2012) The argumentative turn revisited. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garver, Eugene
1994Aristotle’s rhetoric: An art of character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1984The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Thomas McCarthy, trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
1989The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (Thomas Burger, trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1996Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (William Rehg, trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane
1999 “Everyday talk in the deliberative system.” In Deliberative politics: Essays on “Democracy and disagreement,” ed. by Stephen Macedo, 211–242. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McBurney, Peter, David Hitchcock, and Simon Parsons
2007 “The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22 (1): 95–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehg, William
2005 “Assessing the cogency of arguments: Three kinds of merits.” Informal Logic 25 (2): 95–115.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2010Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N.
1998The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Joseph W.
1979 “Jürgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 16: 83–94.Google Scholar