Cover not available
Part of
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 99–114

The visual representation of metaphor

A social semiotic approach

Complementing cognitive theories which attribute the understanding of visual metaphors to situational and cultural contexts, this study adopts a social semiotic perspective to investigate how visual images themselves are constructed to cue conceptual metaphors. The visual realization of metaphors in representational, interactive and compositional meaning structures is elucidated based on Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) visual grammar. It is found that most types of visual metaphor identified by cognitive linguists can be explained within the framework. Instances of visual metaphor in advertisements are analyzed in terms of their persuasive effects. It is concluded that the social semiotic framework is able to provide a comprehensive account of the visual realization of metaphor, and in addition, the study also offers a cognitive explanation of how resources like camera positioning and composition acquire meanings.

Keywords: conceptual metaphor theory, metafunctions, social semiotics, visual grammar, visual metaphor
Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.07fen
References
Carroll, N
(1996) A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(6), 809–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dick, B.F
(2005) Anatomy of film. Boston, Mass: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Dyer, G
(1989) Advertising as communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
El Refaie, E
(2003) Understanding visual metaphor. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Feng, D
(2011a) Visual space and ideology: A critical cognitive analysis of spatial orientations in advertising. In K.L. O’Halloran & B. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 55–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011b) The construction and categorization of multimodal metaphor: A systemic functional approach. Foreign Language Research, 1, 24–29.Google Scholar
Forceville, C
(1994) Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Nonverbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. UriosAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Washing th brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E
(1969) The hidden dimension. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T
(2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Messaris, P
(1994) Visual literacy: Image, mind and reality. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Morris, R
(1993) Visual rhetoric in political cartoons: A structuralist approach. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(3), 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Halloran, K.L
(2005) Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Toole, M
(2010) The language of displayed art. (2nd ed). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Teng, N.Y
(2009) Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 197–211). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yus, F
(2009) Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2022. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. In Visual Metaphors [Benjamins Current Topics, 124], ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.