The visual representation of metaphor
A social semiotic approach
Complementing cognitive theories which attribute the understanding of visual metaphors to situational and cultural contexts, this study adopts a social semiotic perspective to investigate how visual images themselves are constructed to cue conceptual metaphors. The visual realization of metaphors in representational, interactive and compositional meaning structures is elucidated based on Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) visual grammar. It is found that most types of visual metaphor identified by cognitive linguists can be explained within the framework. Instances of visual metaphor in advertisements are analyzed in terms of their persuasive effects. It is concluded that the social semiotic framework is able to provide a comprehensive account of the visual realization of metaphor, and in addition, the study also offers a cognitive explanation of how resources like camera positioning and composition acquire meanings.
References (23)
Carroll, N. (1996). A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(6), 809–822.
Dick, B.F. (2005). Anatomy of film. Boston, Mass: Bedford/St. Martins.
Dyer, G. (1989). Advertising as communication. London: Routledge.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–95.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Feng, D. (2011a). Visual space and ideology: A critical cognitive analysis of spatial orientations in advertising. In K.L. O’Halloran & B. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 55–75). London: Routledge.
Feng, D. (2011b). The construction and categorization of multimodal metaphor: A systemic functional approach. Foreign Language Research, 1, 24–29.
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29.
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. UriosAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
Hall, E. (1969). The hidden dimension. London: Bodley Head.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Messaris, P. (1994). Visual literacy: Image, mind and reality. Boulder: Westview Press.
Morris, R. (1993). Visual rhetoric in political cartoons: A structuralist approach. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(3), 195–210.
O’Halloran, K.L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
O’Toole, M. (2010). The language of displayed art. (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
Teng, N.Y. (2009). Image alignment in multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 197–211). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: a unified account. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.