Cover not available
Part of
Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 115–130

Visual metonymy in children’s picture books

This article aims to explore how the use of visual metonymies in picture books contributes to children’s understanding of stories and, in turn, attracts their attention towards relevant aspects of the plot. The two picture books selected for analysis are Gorilla, by Browne and The Tale of Peter Rabbit, by Potter, intended for children under 9 years of age. A multimodal and cognitive perspective is adopted here to apply the non-verbal trope of visual metonymy to the two picture books that form the sample texts (Forceville, 2009, 2010; Forceville & Urios-Aparisi, 2009). The results of the analysis show that visual metonymies are essentially used in children’s tales to create narrative tension in certain stages of the plot and, in turn, to establish a bond between the represented participants and the child-viewer.
Keywords: multimodality, picture books, systemic functional linguistics, visual metonymy
Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.08moy
References (46)
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. (2002). Generating polysemy: Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 49–74). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Bal, M. (2006). Reading ‘Rembrandt’: Beyond the word-image opposition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Browne, A. (2002[1983]). Gorilla. London: Walker Books.Google Scholar
Carpenter, H. (1989). Excessively impertinent bunnies: The subversive element in Beatrix Potter. In G. Avery & J. Briggs (Eds.), Children and their books: A celebration of the work of Iona and Peter Opie (pp. 271–298). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S. (2007). Qué leer y en qué momento [What to read and when]. In P. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición [Training specialists in the promotion of reading. Second edition] (pp. 285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de CastillaLaMancha.Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.). (2002). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphors in advertising. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework. Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A.J. Moya (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic Issues (pp. 57–74). Basingstoke/ New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. (2010). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse? In R. Caballero & M.J. Pinar (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 57–76). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de CastillaLa Mancha.Google Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, T. (2002). Visual and verbal playmates: An exploration of visual and verbal modalities in children’s picture books. Unpublished B.A. (Honours), University of Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, P. (Ed.). (2004). International companion encyclopedia of children’s literature. Second Edition. Volume I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading images. The grammar of visual design.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moya, A.J. (2010). A multimodal analysis of Tale of Peter Rabbit within the interpersonal metafunction. ATLANTIS, 32(1), 123–140.Google Scholar
. (2011a). Engaging readers through language and pictures. A case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2982–2991. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011b). A bimodal and systemicfunctional study of Dear Zoo within the textual metafunction. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 62, 123–138.Google Scholar
Moya, A.J., & Ávila, J.A. (2009). Thematic progression of children’s stories as related to different stages of cognitive development. Text and Talk, 29(6), 755–774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.U., & Radden, G. (Eds.), (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.U., & Thornburg, L.L. (Eds.), (2003). Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, P. (2011). Don’t be so green. Analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in greenwashing advertisements. Available at: [URL]. Logroño: University of La Rioja.
Perez-Sobrino, P. (2013a). Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor in Focus. Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor Use (pp. 67–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2013b). Humanimals. What do multimodal metaphor and metonymy reveal about meaning creation in environmental advertising? Proceedings of XXX International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 402–408). Lerida: University of Lerida UP.Google Scholar
Potter, B. (2002[1902]). The Tale of Peter Rabbit . In F. Warne (Ed.), Beatrix Potter. The complete tales. The original and authorized edition (pp. 9–20). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Purver, M., Howes, C., Healey, P.G., & Gergoromichelaki, E. (2009). Split utterances in dialogue: a corpus study. Available at: [URL].
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2000). The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2002). From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 107–143.Google Scholar
. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Díez, O.I. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532).Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scott, C. (2001). An unusual hero: Perspective and point of view in The Tale of Peter Rabbit. In M. Mackey (Ed.), Beatrix Potter’s Peter Rabbit: A children’s classic at 100 (pp. 19–30). Lanham, MC: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.R. (2002). Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 323–334). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UriosAparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–117). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, B. (2002). An alternative account on the interpretation of referential metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 113–130). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal manifestations of metaphor and metonymies: A case study. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 119–143). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Martínez-Carratalá, Francisco Antonio & Cristina Cañamares Torrijos
2024. Las relaciones interpersonales y parasociales en las Frog Stories de Mercer Mayer: un análisis semiótico multimodal. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cañamares Torrijos, Cristina
2019. Lectura literaria y multimodal del álbum ilustrado. In Current Perspectives on Literary Reading [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 22], ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.