Part of
On Multiple Source Constructions in Language ChangeEdited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 79] 2015
► pp. 1–17
Edited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 79] 2015
► pp. 1–17
On multiple source constructions in language change
References (32)
Allan, Kathryn. 2010. A dull paper: An example of proportional analogy in semantic change? Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics(ICEHL) at the University of Pécs, 23–27 August 2010.
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg. 2011. Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in “a”-adjective production. Language 87(1). 1–29. 
Burridge, Kate. 1992. Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In: Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds.), Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 17), 199–241. Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In: Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.
. 2007. Diachronic linguistics. In: Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The handbook of cognitive linguistics, 945–987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bynon, Theodora. 1983. Historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, Gerald L. 1987. Syntactic blends in English parole. Frankfurt: Lang.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2010. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction, 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27(3). 529–572.
. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus.P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: opposite or orthogonal? In: Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann, Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Israël, Michael. 1996. The way constructions grow. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–230. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Joseph, Brian D. 2004. Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization“theory”. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline –the nature of grammaticalization, 44–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26. 79–102.
Menard, Philippe. 1978. Manuel du français du moyen âge, vol. 1, Syntaxe de l’ancien français.Bordeaux: SOBODI.
Menge, Hermann. 2000. Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Mondorf, Britta. 2011. Variation and change in English resultatives. Language Variation and Change 22. 397–421.
OED: Murray, James A.H., Henry Brodly, W.A. Craigie & C.T. Onions. 1993. The Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at [URL]
Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere, Arend Quak, Tanneke Schoonheim & Nicoline van der Sijs. 2003–2009. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth.C. 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics 18. 523–557.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Bree, Cor. 1996. Historische taalkunde, 2nd edn. Leuven: Acco.
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1982. The development of the Germanic reduplicating class: Reanalysis and competition in morphological change. In Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds.), Language change, 39–88. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Van der Horst, Johannes M. & Freek Van de Velde. 2003. Zo vreemd een groep. Taal & Tongval Thematic issue 15/16. 237–250.
Van de Velde, Freek & Johannes M. van der Horst. 2013. Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences 36. 66–77.
. Manuscript. The diachrony of so odd a noun phrase.
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, 29–40. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Hilpert, Martin
2024. Corpus linguistics meets historical linguistics and construction grammar: how far have we come, and where do we go from here?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2022. On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
Masini, Francesca & Simone Mattiola
2022. Syntactic discontinuous reduplication with antonymic pairs: a case study from Italian. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 315 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.