Article published in:
On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change
Edited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 79] 2015
► pp. 175204
References
Abondolo, Daniel
1998Finnish. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 149–183. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2006Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anepaio, Terje
1999The land next to Ingria: Ingrian-Finns in North-East Estonia after world war II. In Markku Teinonen & Timo J. Virtanen (eds.), Ingrians and neighbours: Focus on the eastern Baltic Sea region (Studia Fennica Ethnologica 5), 155–181. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1999From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism 3(4). 309–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, Raymond
2000Morphology in the mind: Word processing in Finnish and Dutch. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. B 235. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Phonology and language use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K. & Peter Trudgill
1998Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael
1987Constraints on code switching: How universal are they? Linguistics 25. 739–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Eric
1996Ingermanländarna i Estland [The Ingrians in Estonia]. Siirtolaisuus — Migration 1. 3–11.Google Scholar
Ehala, Martin
2009Linguistic strategies and markedness in Estonian morphology. Language Typology and Universals 62. 29–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku
2003The quest for the most ‘parsimonious’ explanations: Endogeny vs. contact revisited. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 161–173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, Uli H. & Robert Schroeder
1992Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 165–183. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grünthal, Riho
2000Typological characteristics of the Finnic languages: A reappraisal. In Johanna Laakso (ed.), Facing Finnic: Some challenges to historical and contact linguistics (Castrenianumin toimitteita 59), 31–63. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society & Department of Finno-Ugrian Studies of the University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Gürel, Ayşe
1999Decomposition: To what extent? The case of Turkish. Brain and Language 68. 218–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge
1989Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In William Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical representation and process, 392–408. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics 31. 279–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hassinen, Sirje
2002Simultaaninen kaksikielisyys: Läheiset sukukielet viro ja suomi rinnakkain [Simultaneous bilingualism: Closely related languages Estonian and Finnish side by side] (Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Humaniora B 43). Oulu: Oulu University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Contact and grammaticalization. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 86–105. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich
1986Principles of historical linguistics (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, Tapio
2001Slips of the tongue: Errors, repairs, and a model (Studia Fennica Linguistica 10). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Järvikivi, Juhani & Jussi Niemi
2002Allomorphs as paradigm indices: On-line experiments with Finnish free and bound stems. SKY Journal of Linguistics 15. 119–143.Google Scholar
Järvikivi, Juhani
2003Allomorphy and morphological salience in the mental lexicon (University of Joensuu Publications in the Humanities 32). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Scott & Aneta Pavlenko
2007Cross-linguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaivapalu, Annekatrin
2005Lähdekieli kohdekielen oppimisen apuna [Contribution of L1 to foreign language acquisition] (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 44). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
1983Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne [Finnish phonology and morphology]. Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar
1999Finnish: An essential grammar. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Dorit & Mark Aronoff
1989Morphological interaction between L1 and L2 in language attrition. In Susan Gass, Carolyn Madden, Dennis Preston & Larry Selinker (eds.), Variation in second language acquisition, vol. 2, Psycholinguistic issues (Multilingual Matters 50), 202–215. Clevedon, PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Kokko, Ossi
2007Inkerinsuomen pirstaleisuus: Eräiden sijojen kehitys murteen yksilöllistymisen kuvastajana [Scattered Ingrian Finnish: The development of selected cases as reflectors of the invidualisation of a dialect] (University of Joensuu Publications in the Humanities 48). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Kokko, Ossi, Ilkka Savijärvi & Muusa Savijärvi
(eds.) 2003Ennev vanhasii: Pohjois ja Keski-Inkerin kieltä ja kohtaloita [Ennev vanhasii: Language and destinies from North and Middle Ingria] (Studia Carelica Humanistica 18). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Kurs, Ott
1990Ingeri põliselanike saatus [The fate of indigenous Ingrian people]. Akadeemia 7. 1484–1499.Google Scholar
Laakso, Johanna
2010Contact and the Finno-Ugric languages. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 598–617. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2006Pleonasm and hypercharacterization. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2005, 119–154. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Lehtinen, Tapani
2007Kielen vuosituhannet: Suomen kielen kehitys kantauralista varhaissuo meen [The millennia of a language: The development of Finnish from Proto-Uralic to Early Finnish] (Tietolipas 215). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Lehto, Manja
1996Ingrian Finnish: Dialect preservation and change (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 23). Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Anna-Riitta
1993Miten muodot muuttuvat? Ruijan murteen verbintaivutus Raisin, Pyssyjoen ja Annijoen kveeniyhteisöissä [How do the forms change? Ruija dialect verb inflection in the Raisi, Pyssyjoki and Annijoki communities of Finnish origin]. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G
1976On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 15. 169–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Maisa
1989Amerikansuomen morfologiaa ja fonologiaa [The morphology and phonology of American Finnish]. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä licenciate thesis.Google Scholar
1990Suomi vieraana kielenä: esimerkkejä taivutusmuotojen tuottamises-ta [Finnish as a foreign language: Examples of the production of inflectional forms]. In Jorma Tommola (ed.), Vieraan kielen ymmärtäminen ja tuottaminen [Understanding and producing a foreign language] (AFinLA:n vuosikirja 1990), 89–102. Turku: The Finnish Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1993Muoto-opin seikkoja [Aspects of morphology]. In Pertti Virtaranta, Hannele Jönsson-Korhola, Maisa Martin & Maija Kainulainen. Amerikansuomi [American Finnish] (Tietolipas 125), 97–101. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2009Language contact (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Contact, convergence, and typology. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 320–339. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Lise
1989Some people who don’t talk right: Universal and particular in child language, aphasia, and language obsolescence. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, 335–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol
2002Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol & Janice L. Jake
2000Four types of morphemes: Evidence from aphasia, codeswitching and second language acquisition. Linguistics 38(6). 1053–1100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Jussi
2006Paradigm competition: An experimental note on Finnish verbs. In Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen & Kaius Sinnemäki (eds.), A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday. A special supplement to SKY Journal of Linguistics 19. Available at http://​www​.linguistics​.fi​/julkaisut​/sky2006special​.shtml.Google Scholar
Niemi, Jussi, Matti Laine & Juhani Tuominen
1994Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes 9. 423–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Michel
2004A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism (Studies in Bilingualism 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rätsep, Huno
1989Eesti keele tekkimise lugu [The genesis of Estonian]. Akadeemia 7. 1503– 1524. Tartu.Google Scholar
Remes, Hannu
2009Muodot kontrastissa: Suomen ja viron vertailevaa taivutustypologiaa [Forms in contrast: A contrastive study of inflectional morphology in Finnish and Estonian] (Acta Universitas Ouluensis B Humaniora 90). Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Riionheimo, Helka
1999Morphological attrition and interference in language contact: A processing approach. In Marja Nenonen & Juhani Järvikivi (eds.), Languages, minds, and brains: Papers from A NorFa Summer School, Mekrijärvi, Finland, June 22–29, 1998 (Studies in Languages 34), 178–194. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
2000When sisters meet: Ingrian Finnish in Estonia. In Johanna Laakso (ed.), Facing Finnic: Some challenges to historical and contact linguistics (Castrenianumin toimitteita 59), 168–184. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society & Department of Finno-Ugrian Studies of the University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2002How to borrow a bound morpheme? The status of structural cross-linguistic influence in a contact situation between closely-related languages. SKY Journal of Linguistics 15. 187–217.Google Scholar
2007Muutoksen monet juuret: Oman ja vieraan risteytyminen Viron inker insuomalaisten imperfektinmuodostuksessa [The multiple roots of change: Mixing native and borrowed influence in the past tense formation by Ingrian Finns in Estonia] (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 1107). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2009Interference and attrition in inflectional morphology: A theoretical perspective. In Esa Penttilä & Heli Paulasto (eds.), Language contacts meet English dialects: Studies in honour of Markku Filppula, 83–104. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2010aThe preservation of morphophonological complexity in first language attrition: The case of Ingrian Finnish dialect in Estonia. In Barry Heselwood &Clive Upton (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIII: Papers from the Thirteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 2008, 270–278. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010bYksilöllinen variaatio Viron inkerinsuomalaisten imperfektinmuo-dostuksessa [Individual variation in the past tense formation of Ingrian Finns in Estonia]. Publications of the Võro Institute 23. 51–67.Google Scholar
2010cMorfologinen limittyminen suomen ja viron kontaktissa [Morphological mixing in a contact between Finnish and Estonian]. Lähivõrdlusi/ Lähivertailuja 20. 218–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Complex morphologies in contact: The case of Ingrian Finns in Estonia. In Kelechukwu Ihemere (ed.), Language contact and language shift: Grammatical and sociolinguistic perspectives, 10–36. München: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Riionheimo, Helka & Krista Kivisalu
(eds.) 1994Inkeriläiskertomuksia [Stories from Ingria] (Studia Carelica Humanistica 4). Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1995Bilingualism (Language in Society 13), 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Sarhimaa, Anneli
1999Syntactic transfer, contact-induced change, and the evolution of bilingual mixed codes: Focus on Karelian-Russian language alternation (Studia Fennica Linguistica 9). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1992Theory of language death. In Matthias Brenzinger (ed.), Language death: Factual and theoretical explorations with special reference to East Africa, 7–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savijärvi, Ilkka
2003Inkerinsuomi ja suomalaiset Inkerinmaalla. [Ingrian Finnish and Finns in Ingria]. In Hannele Jönsson-Korhola & Anna-Riitta Lindgren (eds.), Monena suomi maailmalla: suomalaisperäisiä kielivähemmistöjä [The various forms of Finnish in the world: Linguistic minorities of Finnish origin] (Tietolipas 190), 272–299. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Savijärvi, Ilkka & Muusa Savijärvi
1999Language contacts in Ingrian-Finnish. In Markku Teinonen & Timo J. Virtanen (eds.), Ingrians and neighbours: Focus on the eastern Baltic Sea region (Studia Fennica Ethnologica 5), 23–47. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Savijärvi, Ilkka, Muusa Savijärvi & Janne Heikkinen
(eds.) 1996Vot, ihminen tahtoo kotimaalle: Länsi-Inkerin kieltä ja kohtaloita [Vot, ihminen tahtoo kotimaalle: Language and destinies from Western Ingria] (Studia Carelica Humanistica 8). Joensuu: Joensuun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Schmid, Monika S
2004A new blueprint for language attrition research. In Monika S. Schmid, Barbara Köpke, Merel Keijzer & Lina Weilemar (eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues, 349–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Monika S. & Barbara Köpke
2009L1 attrition and the mental lexicon. In Anita Pavlenko (ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches, 209–238. Briston: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2008Language contact: Constraints and common paths of contact-induced language change. In Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages, 3–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smits, Caroline
1996Disintegration of inflection: The case of Iowa Dutch. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul & Brian MacWhinney
1986Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory & Cognition 14. 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G
2001Language contact: An introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter Meijes
1982Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toivainen, Jorma
1997The acquisition of Finnish. In Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 4, 87–182. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004New dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1974 [1953]Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Grünthal, Riho
2020. The spread zones and contacts of medieval Finnic in the Northeastern Baltic Sea area: Implications for the rate of language change. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.