Cover not available
Part of
On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change
Edited by Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 79] 2015
► pp. 205–221

Multiple sources and multiple causes multiply explored

| The Ohio State University

Multiple sources abound in language, at all levels of linguistic analysis (phonology, syntax, semantics, etc.), and in a range of historical pursuits, including etymology and variationist investigations. From a methodological standpoint, moreover, recognizing multiple sources is often good historical linguistic practice (contrary to inclinations towards neat and elegant solutions that satisfy Occam’s Razor). That is, if we can identify multiple pressures on some part of a language system, it cannot always readily be excluded that some or even all might have played a role in shaping a particular development; if all of the factors represent reasonable pressures that speakers could have been aware of and influenced by, excluding any could simply be arbitrary. In this paper, accordingly, I survey the breadth of multiple sources in a variety of areas of language change, and advance one particular consequence that multiple sources can lead to, namely the hypothesis that recognizing multiple sources can be a basis for positing proto-language variation that is realized in variation within single languages and across related languages.

Keywords: borrowing, drift, enantioseme, etymology, multiple causation, proto-language variation, suppletion
Published online: 25 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.79.08jos
References
Anderson, John, Hope C. Dawson & Brian D. Joseph
2010 Historical linguistics. In Kirsten Malmkjaer (ed.), The Routledge linguistics encyclopedia, 3rd edn, 225–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978 On the go ~ went alternation: A contribution (?) to the generative phonology of English. In Tom Ernst & Evan Smith (eds.), Lingua Pranca. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Finkin, Jordan
2005 Enantiodrama: Enantiosemia in Arabic and beyond. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 68. 369–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A
2003 Evidentiality in the Balkans. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark
2007 Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hesseling, Dirk C
1920 Le coucher de soleil en Grèce. Neophilologus 5. 165–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1976 Review of Raimo Anttila, An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics . Language 52. 202–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. & Brian D. Joseph
2003. Reconsidering the canons of sound change: Towards a big bang theory. In Barry Blake & Kate Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001, 205–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jokl, Norbert
1914 Eine albanesisch-neugriechische Wortparallele. Mitteilungen des Rumänischen Instituts der Universität Wien I. 298–308.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D
1982a The source of Ancient Greek tolupē . Glotta 60. 230–234.Google Scholar
1982b Oscan slaagi . Glotta 60. 112–115.Google Scholar
1983/2009 The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A study in areal, general, and historical linguistics (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Supplementary Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (reissued in paperback, 2009, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
1999 Utterance-finality: Framing the issues. In Bohumil Palek, Osamu Fujimura & Brian Joseph (eds.), Proceedings of LP ‘98 (4th Linguistics and Phonetics Conference), vol. 2, 3–13. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
2006 On projecting variation back into a proto-language, with particular attention to Germanic evidence and some thoughts on ‘drift’. In Thomas Cravens (ed.), Variation and reconstruction, 103–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Historical linguistics in 2008: The state of the art. In Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), Unity and diversity of languages, 175–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 A variationist solution to apparent copying across related languages. In Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds.), Copies versus cognates in bound morphology, ch. 7, 151–164. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Demystifying ‘drift’ — a variationist account. In Lars Johanson, Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Shared grammaticalization with special focus on the Transeurasian languages. 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kriaras, Emmanuel
1937 Sur l’expression grecque moderne βασιλεύει ‘ο ‘ήλιος. Revue Internationale des Études Balkaniques 3. 462–468.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1963 The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–303.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1976 Multi-conditioned sound change and the impact of morphology on pho- nology. Language 52(4). 757–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrman, Ralf
1999 Creating the world in our image. In Max Nänny & Olga Fischer (eds.), Form miming meaning, 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papahagi, Tache
1923 O problema de romanitate sudilirica. Grai şi Suflet 1. 72ff.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004 New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2022. On Multiple Paths and Change in the Language Network. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.