Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners
For L2-learners, confusable phonemic categories lead to ambiguous lexical representations. Yet, learners can establish separate lexical representations for confusable categories, as shown by asymmetric patterns of lexical access, but the source of this asymmetry is not clear (Cutler et al., 2006). Two hypotheses compete, situating its source either at the lexical coding level or at the phonetic categorization level. The lexical coding hypothesis suggests that learners’ encoding of an unfamiliar category is not target-like but makes reference to a familiar L1 category (encoded as a poor exemplar of that L1 category). Four experiments examined how learners lexically encode confusable phonemic categories. American English learners of Japanese and of German were tested on phonetic categorization and lexical decision for geminate/singleton contrasts and front/back rounded vowel contrasts. Results showed the same asymmetrical patterns as Cutler et al.’s (2006), indicating that learners encode a lexical distinction between difficult categories. Results also clarify that the source of the asymmetry is located at the lexical coding level and does not emerge during input categorization: the distinction is not target-like, and makes reference to L1 categories. We further provide new evidence that asymmetries can be resolved over time: advanced learners are establishing more native-like lexical representations.
References (40)
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L
(
1995)
The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Banno, E., Ohno, Y., Sakane, Y., & Shinagawa, C
(
1999)
Genki: An integrated course in elementary Japanese [volume 1,2]. Tokyo: Japan Times.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(
2000)
First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals.
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189–221.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A
(
2008)
Phantom word activation in L2.
System, 36, 22–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M
(
2002)
Comprehension of non-native speech: Inaccurate phoneme processing and activation of lexical competitors. In
Proceedings of the 7th international conference on spoken language processing
(pp. 261–264).
Broersma, M
(
2012)
Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1205–1224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A
(
2011)
Competition dynamics of second-language listening.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 74–95.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T
(
2006)
Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening.
Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A., Glover, J., Kaden, C., McGuire, M., & Scott, J.H.G
(
2012)
Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English-L2 French acquisition.
Second Language Research, 28, 5–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dijkstra, A. & Van Heuven, W.J.B
(
1998)
The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In
J. Grainger &
A.M. Jacobs(Eds.),
Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp.189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S
(
2008)
Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish.
Cognition, 106, 682–706.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H
(
2008)
Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access.
Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.M
(
1973)
Lexical access and naming time.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C
(
2003)
DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy.
Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frauenfelder, U.H., Scholten, M., & Content, A
(
2001)
Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition.
Language and cognitive processes, 16, 583–607.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gaskell, M.G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(
2001)
Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap.
Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 325–349.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, M
(
1992)
The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for non-native speakers.
Phonetica, 49, 102–127.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hardison, D.M., & Motohashi Saigo, M
(
2010)
Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 81–99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes-Harb, R., & Masuda, K
(
2008)
Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts.
Second Language Research, 24, 5–33.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jared, D., & Szucs, C
(
2002)
Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual omograph naming.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 225–239.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ju, M., & Luce, P.A
(
2004)
Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation.
Psychological Science, 15, 314–318.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ju, M., & Luce, P.A
(
2006)
Representational specificity of within-category phonetic variation in the long-term mental lexicon.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 120–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.J
(
2003)
Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(
1987)
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.
Cognition, 25, 71–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Aslin, R.N
(
2002)
Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.
Cognition, 86, B33–B42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Haywood, S.L
(
2009)
The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition.
Cognition, 111, 263–269.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(
1997)
A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception.
Cognition, 64, B9–B17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(
2001)
The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries.
Psychological Science,12, 445–449.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polka, L
(
1995)
Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebastián-Gallés, N
(
2005)
Cross-Language Speech Perception. In
D.B. Pisoni &
R.E. Remez(Eds.),
The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp.546–566). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L
(
2005)
The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals.
Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Díaz, B
(
2006)
First and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1277–1291.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, M.J., & Marian, V
(
1999)
Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon.
Psychological Science, 10, 281–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K
(
2007)
Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1111–1129.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A.G
(
2009)
The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants.
Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K.G
(
2008)
Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123, 397–413.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trofimovich, P., & John, P
(
2011)
When three equals tree. In
P. Trofimovich &
K. McDonough(Eds.),
Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from Psycholinguistics (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, A., & Cutler, A
(
2004)
Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition.
Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Cook, Svetlana V., Nick B. Pandža, Alia K. Lancaster & Kira Gor
2016.
Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings.
Frontiers in Psychology 7
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.