Part of
Phonological and Phonetic Considerations of Lexical Processing
Edited by Gonia Jarema and Gary Libben
[Benjamins Current Topics 80] 2015
► pp. 119168
References
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L
(1995) The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Banno, E., Ohno, Y., Sakane, Y., & Shinagawa, C
(1999) Genki: An integrated course in elementary Japanese [volume 1,2]. Tokyo: Japan Times.Google Scholar
Best, C.T., & Tyler, M.D
(2007) Nonnative and second language speech perception. Commonalities and complementarities. InO.-S. Bohn & M.J. Munro(Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2000) First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A
(2008) Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36, 22–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M
(2002) Comprehension of non-native speech: Inaccurate phoneme processing and activation of lexical competitors. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on spoken language processing (pp. 261–264).
(2012) Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1205–1224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A
(2011) Competition dynamics of second-language listening. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 74–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T
(2006) Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A., Glover, J., Kaden, C., McGuire, M., & Scott, J.H.G
(2012) Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English-L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research, 28, 5–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, A. & Van Heuven, W.J.B
(1998) The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. InJ. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs(Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp.189–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S
(2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H
(2008) Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.M
(1973) Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C
(2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frauenfelder, U.H., Scholten, M., & Content, A
(2001) Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: Phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition. Language and cognitive processes, 16, 583–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, M.G., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(2001) Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 325–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, M
(1992) The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for non-native speakers. Phonetica, 49, 102–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardison, D.M., & Motohashi Saigo, M
(2010) Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., & Masuda, K
(2008) Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research, 24, 5–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Szucs, C
(2002) Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual omograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 225–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ju, M., & Luce, P.A
(2004) Falling on sensitive ears: Constraints on bilingual lexical activation. Psychological Science, 15, 314–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Representational specificity of within-category phonetic variation in the long-term mental lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 120–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.J
(2003) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W.D
(1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Aslin, R.N
(2002) Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33–B42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Haywood, S.L
(2009) The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111, 263–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(1997) A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2001) The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science,12, 445–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polka, L
(1995) Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N
(2005) Cross-Language Speech Perception. InD.B. Pisoni & R.E. Remez(Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp.546–566). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L
(2005) The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Rodríguez-Fornells, A., de Diego-Balaguer, R., & Díaz, B
(2006) First and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1277–1291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M.J., & Marian, V
(1999) Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 10, 281–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V
(2008) Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. InJ.G. Hansen Edwards & M.L. Zampini(Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K
(2007) Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1111–1129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A.G
(2009) The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K.G
(2008) Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 123, 397–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & John, P
(2011) When three equals tree. InP. Trofimovich & K. McDonough(Eds.), Applying priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and research: Insights from Psycholinguistics (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A
(2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Cook, Svetlana V., Nick B. Pandža, Alia K. Lancaster & Kira Gor
2016. Fuzzy Nonnative Phonolexical Representations Lead to Fuzzy Form-to-Meaning Mappings. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.