Article published in:Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Benjamins Current Topics 87] 2016
► pp. 7–34
Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation
Multi-dimensional analyses have been conducted for many different discourse domains and many different languages. Using bottom-up statistical analyses, these studies have investigated specific patterns of register variation in several different discourse domains of English, as well as the more general patterns of register variation in many different languages. Each study identifies linguistic dimensions that are peculiar to that particular language/domain. However, the more theoretically interesting finding is that linguistically similar dimensions emerge in nearly all of these studies. Two of these dimensions are especially robust, making them strong candidates for universal dimensions of register variation: (1) a fundamental opposition between clausal/‘oral’ discourse vs. phrasal/‘literate’ discourse, and (2) the opposition between narrative vs. non-narrative discourse. The present paper introduces the methodology of multi-dimensional analysis and surveys the research studies carried out to date, with an emphasis on these potentially universal patterns of register variation.
Keywords: cross-linguistic universals, literate discourse, multi-dimensional analysis, oral discourse, register variation
Published online: 20 July 2016
Asención Delaney, Y. and Collentine, J.
Berber-Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C. and Acunzo, Ch
Biber, D., Connor, U. and Upton, T.A.
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K. and Tracy-Ventura, N.
Biber, D. and Gray, B.
Biber, D., Gray, B. and Poonpon, K.
Biber, D. and Hared, M.
Biber, D. and Jones, J.K.
Biber, D. and Kurjian, J.
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E. and Nekrasova, T.
Kim, YongJin and Biber, D.
Cited by 4 other publications
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
Silliman, Elaine R., Ruth Huntley Bahr & Louise C. Wilkinson
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.