Cover not available
Part of
Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast
Edited by Marie-Aude Lefer and Svetlana Vogeleer
[Benjamins Current Topics 87] 2016
► pp. 7–34

Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation

 | Northern Arizona University, USA
Multi-dimensional analyses have been conducted for many different discourse domains and many different languages. Using bottom-up statistical analyses, these studies have investigated specific patterns of register variation in several different discourse domains of English, as well as the more general patterns of register variation in many different languages. Each study identifies linguistic dimensions that are peculiar to that particular language/domain. However, the more theoretically interesting finding is that linguistically similar dimensions emerge in nearly all of these studies. Two of these dimensions are especially robust, making them strong candidates for universal dimensions of register variation: (1) a fundamental opposition between clausal/‘oral’ discourse vs. phrasal/‘literate’ discourse, and (2) the opposition between narrative vs. non-narrative discourse. The present paper introduces the methodology of multi-dimensional analysis and surveys the research studies carried out to date, with an emphasis on these potentially universal patterns of register variation.
Keywords: cross-linguistic universals, literate discourse, multi-dimensional analysis, oral discourse, register variation
Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.87.02bib
References (38)
References
Asención Delaney, Y. and Collentine, J. 2011. “A Multidimensional Analysis of Written L2 Spanish”. Applied Linguistics 32(3):299–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, D. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Berber-Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C. and Acunzo, Ch. 2012. “Dimensions of Variation in Spoken and Written Brazilian Portuguese”. Ms. Google Scholar
Besnier, N. 1988. “The Linguistic Relationships of Spoken and Written Nukulaelae Registers”. Language 64:707–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. 1985. “Investigating Macroscopic Textual Variation through Multifeature/Multidimensional Analyses”. Linguistics 23:337–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English: Resolving the Contradictory Findings”. Language 62:384–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Dimensions of Variation among Eighteenth-century Speech-based and Written Registers”. In Multi-Dimensional Studies of Register Variation in English, S. Conrad and D. Biber (eds), 200–214. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Corpus-based Analyses of Discourse: Dimensions of Variation in Conversation”. In Advances in Discourse Studies, V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew and R. Jones (eds), 100–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Are There Linguistic Consequences of Literacy? Comparing the Potentials of Language Use in Speech and Writing”. In Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), 75–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Speech and Writing: Linguistic Styles Enabled by the Technology of Literacy”. In The Pragmatics of Society, G. Andersen and K. Aijmer (eds), 137–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U. and Upton, T.A. 2007. Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J.K. and Tracy-Ventura, N. 2006. “Spoken and Written Register Variation in Spanish: a Multi-dimensional Analysis”. Corpora 1:7–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Gray, B. 2011. “Grammar Emerging in the Noun Phrase: the Influence of Written Language Use”. English Language and Linguistics 15:223–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Discourse Characteristics of Writing and Speaking Responses on the TOEFL iBT. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B. and Poonpon, K. 2011. “Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development?”. TESOL Quarterly 45:5–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Hared, M. 1992. “Dimensions of Register Variation in Somali”. Language Variation and Change 4: 41–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Jones, J.K. 2005. “Merging Corpus Linguistic and Discourse-analytic Research Goals: Discourse Units in Biology Research Articles”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1:151–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. and Kurjian, J. 2007. “Towards a Taxonomy of Web Registers and Text Types: a Multi-dimensional Analysis”. In Corpus Linguistics and the Web, M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf and C. Biewer (eds), 109–132. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Egbert, J. 2012. “Style in Nineteenth Century Fiction: a Multi-dimensional Analysis”. Scientific Study of Literature 2:167–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, E. 2009. The Language of Outsourced Call Centers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Twenty-five Years of Biber’s Multi-dimensional Analysis: Introduction to the Special Issue and Interview with Douglas Biber”. Corpora 8(2):715–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. 2011. Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English: a Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B. 2013. “More than Discipline: Uncovering Multi-dimensional Patterns of Variation in Academic Research Articles”. Corpora 8(2): 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E. and Nekrasova, T. 2011. “Variation among Blogs: a Multi-dimensional Analysis”. In Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, A. Mehler, S. Sharoff and M. Santini (eds), 303–322. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Jang, Shyue-Chian. 1998. Dimensions of Spoken and Written Taiwanese: a Corpus-based Register Study. PhD dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B. 2007. “Rhetorical Moves in Biochemistry Research Articles”. In Biber, Connor and Upton 2007. 73–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, YongJin and Biber, D. 1994. “A Corpus-based Analysis of Register Variation in Korean”. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds), 157–181. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kodytek, V. 2007. “On the Replicability of the Biber Model: the Case of Czech”. Ms.Google Scholar
Parodi, G. 2007. “Variation across Registers in Spanish”. In Working with Spanish Corpora, G. Parodi (ed), 11–53. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Purvis, T.M. 2008. A Linguistic and Discursive Analysis of Register Variation in Dagbani. PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Reppen, R. 2001. “Register Variation in Student and Adult Speech and Writing”. In Multi-Dimensional Studies of Register Variation in English, S. Conrad and D. Biber (eds), 187–199. London: Longman.Google Scholar
White, M. 1994. Language in Job Interviews: Differences Relating to Success and Socioeconomic Variables. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Xiao, R. 2009. “Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes”. World English 28(4):421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Gorina, O. G. & N. S. Tsarakova
2021. Corpus Routes and Experiments in Language Teaching. NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 19:2 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Silliman, Elaine R., Ruth Huntley Bahr & Louise C. Wilkinson
2020. Writing across the academic languages: introduction. Reading and Writing 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
2019. Using the BNC and the Spoken BNC2014 to Study the Syntactic Development ofI ThinkandI’m Sure. English Studies 100:6 ► pp. 710 ff. DOI logo
Monaco, Leida Maria
2019. Chapter 5. Exploring the narrative dimension in late Modern English History texts. In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Monaco, Leida Maria
2021. Chapter 15. Spotting register-internal variation in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century life sciences. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
Ustyantseva, A.E.
2019. HEDGING IN ACADEMIC WRITING. Issues of Applied Linguistics ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.