Article published in:
Translation and Interpreting Pedagogy in Dialogue with Other Disciplines
Edited by Sonia Colina and Claudia V. Angelelli
[Benjamins Current Topics 90] 2017
► pp. 55–82

Applying Task-Based Learning to translator education

Assisting the development of novice translators’ problem-solving expertise

This paper reports and discusses the outcomes of an innovative pilot training program using Task-Based Learning (TBL) in the context of translator education. The objectives were twofold: to investigate the extent to which the use of TBL helped novice participants develop their problem-solving skills, and to examine learner perceptions of the usefulness of TBL. The training program incorporates key characteristics of TBL, including tasks consisting of pedagogically sequenced stages, guided by the overall objective of achieving learner autonomy. In this study, six postgraduate students majoring in translation and interpreting in Australian universities participated in the program. The process and product of five tasks were evaluated by two professional translators using a set of rubrics. A series of interviews was conducted to identify learner perceptions of the usefulness of TBL. Overall, learners showed progress in recognizing differences between novices and professionals and in solving key problems. In terms of the second research objective, the learners perceived TBL to be a useful learning methodology, facilitating awareness of novice-professional differences, appreciation of the critical consequences derived from risks and problems, and development of interpersonal skills, including the discovery of new approaches to resolving translation challenges through peer interaction.
Keywords: problem-solving, Task-Based Learning, translator competence, translator education
Published online: 30 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.90.04ino
References

References

Aula Int
2005 “Translator Training and Modern Market Demands.” Perspectives 13 (2): 132–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boshuizen, Henry P.A., and Henk Schmidt
1992 “On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates, and Novices.” Cognitive Science 16 (2): 153–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Lynne
2004 “What Does It Take to Working the Translation Profession in Canada in the 21st Century? Exploring a Database of Job Advertisements.” Meta 49 (1): 960–972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breen, Michael P.
1987 “Learner Contributions to Task Design.” In Language Learning Tasks, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Dermot Murphy, 23–46. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bruffee, Kenneth A.
1993 Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher
1984 “Syllabus Design as a Critical Process.” ELT Documents No. 118, 29–46. London: Pergamon and The British Council.Google Scholar
2009 “Task Based Language Learning.” In Task-Based Language Teaching: A Reader, ed. by Kris Van den Branden, Martin Bygate, and John M. Norris, 21–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Some Questions about Advising.” In Autonomy in Language Learning: Advising in Action, ed. by Christian Ludwig, and Jo Mynard. Canterbury: University of Kent, IATEFL.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher, and Christoph Edelhoff
1982 Challenges: Teachers’ Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
2000 Memes of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew, and Emma Wagner
2004 Can Theory Help Translators? A Dialogue between the Ivory Tower and the Wordface. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod
2003 Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Folaron, Deborah
2006 “A Discipline Coming of Age in the Digital Age.” In Perspectives on Localization, ed. by Keiran Dunne, 195–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Galán-Mañas, Anabel
2011 “Translating Authentic Technical Documents in Specialised Translation Classes.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 16: 109–125.Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel
2004 “Integrated Problem and Decision Reporting as a Translator Training Tool.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 2: 2–20.Google Scholar
González Davies, Maria
2003 “Translating Children’s Literature on the Web: An Authentic Project.” In Traducción y Literatura Infantil, ed. by Isabel Pascua, 23–26. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Anaga.Google Scholar
2004 Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gouadec, Daniel
2007 Translation as a Profession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Izumi
2012 Novice-professional Differences in Addressing Translating Challenges: The Development of an Effective Pedagogical Approach to Translator Education. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Kelly, Dorothy
2000 “Text Selection for Developing Translator Competence: Why Texts from the Tourist Sector Constitute Suitable Material.” In Developing Translation Competence, ed. by Christina Schäffner, and Beverly Adab, 157–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 A Handbook for Translator Trainers. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kiraly, Don
2000 A Social Constructivist Approach to Translator Education. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
2005 “Project-Based Learning: A Case for Situated Translation.” Meta 50 (4): 1098–1111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koby, Geoffrey, and Brian James Baer
2003 “Task-Based Instruction and the New Technology: Training Translators for the Modern Language Industry.” In Beyond the Ivory Tower, ATA Scholarly Monograph Series XII, ed. by Brian James Baer, and Geoffrey Koby, 211–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Rosemary
2004 “The Competencies Required by the Translator’s Roles as a Professional.” In Translation in Undergraduate Degree Programmes, ed. by Kirsten Malmkjær, 31–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
NAATI
2012 “Why is NAATI Accreditation Important in Australia.” http://​www​.naati​.com​.au​/accreditation​.html. Last accessed 5 January 2015.
Nunan, David
2004 Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
PACTE
2008 “First Results of a Translation Competence Experiment: ‘Knowledge of Translation’ and ‘Efficacy of the Translation Process.’” In Translator and Interpreter Training. Issues, Methods and Debates, ed. by John Kearns, 104–126. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011 “Results of the Validation of the PACTE Translation Competence Model: Translation Problems and Translation Competence.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, ed. by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild, and Elisabet Tiselius, 317–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2003 “Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age: In Defense of a Minimalist Approach.” Meta 48 (4): 481–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Translator Training.” http://​usuaris​.tinet​.cat​/apym​/on​-line​/training​/2009​_translator​_training​.pdf. Last accessed 5 January 2015.
Samuda, Virginia, and Martin Bygate
2008 Tasks in Second Language Learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, Kris, Martin Bygate, and John M. Norris
2009 “Task-Based Language Teaching: Introducing the Reader.” In Task-Based Language Teaching: A Reader, ed. by Kris Van den Branden, Martin Bygate, and John M. Norris, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Jane
1996 A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar