Article published in:
Current trends in analyzing syntactic variation
Edited by Ludovic De Cuypere, Clara Vanderschueren and Gert De Sutter
[Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31] 2017
► pp. 219242
References

References

Cappelle, Bert
2006 “Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’.” In: Constructions.Google Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930–1955.” Studies in Linguistic Analysis (Special Volume of the Philological Society), 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Patient Arguments of Causative Verbs can be Omitted: the Role of Information Structure in Argument Distribution.” Language Sciences 34 (4–5): 503–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Surface Generalizations: An Alternative to Alternations.” Cognitive Linguistics 13 (4): 327–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th., and A. Stefanowitsch
2004 “Extending Collostructional Analysis. A Corpus-Based Perspective on ‘Alternations’.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog, and Elif Bamyaci
2014 “Coding Causal-Noncausal Verb Alternations: A Form-Frequency Correspondence Explanation.” Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen
2015 “Causalness and the Encoding of the Causative-Anticausative Alternation in French and Spanish.” Journal of Linguistics 51 (3): 562–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin, and Florent Perek
2015 “Meaning Change in a Petri Dish: Constructions, Semantic Vector Spaces, and Motion Charts.” Linguistic Vanguard. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, Joseph B.
1964 “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis.” Psychometrika 29 (1): 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten
1998Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity. Causative Constructions in English. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Usage-Based Perspectives on Lexical and Constructional Semantics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Lenci, Alessandro
2008 “Distributional Semantics in Linguistic and Cognitive Research.” Rivista di Linguistica 20 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth, and Hovav Malka Rappaport
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perek, Florent
2016 “Using Distributional Semantics to Study Semantic Productivity in Diachrony: A Case Study.” Linguistics 54 (1): 149–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and Corpus-Based Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Purandare, Amruta, and Ted Pedersen
2004 “Word Sense Discrimination by Clustering Contexts in Vector and Similarity Spaces.” In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 41–48. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2013R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turney, Peter, and Patrick Pantel
2010 “From Frequency to Meaning: Vector space models of semantics.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37: 141–188.Google Scholar
Wild, Fridolin
2007 “An LSA Package for R.” In Mini-Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Latent Semantic Analysis in Technology-Enhanced Learning, ed. by Fridolin Wild, Marco Kalz, Jan van Bruggen, and Rob Koper, 11–12.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Heidinger, Steffen
2019. Reflexive and unmarked anticausatives in French and Spanish: Frequency of transitive use and undergoer overlap. Langages N°216:4  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.